Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Obama Birth Certificates Surface In Alabama Eligibility Case
freedom outpost ^ | May 1, 2013 | Tim Brown

Posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE

The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.

Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.

Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:

“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”

But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: afterbirtherbs; alabama; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; cairmsm; certifigate; destroyeconomy; dirtystatedept; eligibilitycase; fogbow; fraud; fundbrotherhood; jail; muslimbrotherhood; nationalsecurity; naturalborncitizen; obama; obotbs; obotsaretrolls; obotspaidtodisrupt; plannedattack; roymoore; saudipuppet; ushijacked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-218 next last
All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a “birther issue.” It’s not. It’s a criminal issue. It’s a national security issue.
1 posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001

Uh........

2 posted on 05/01/2013 8:13:16 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

If there are two 0bama birth certificates and the information varies on any material data,

at least one is a forgery, and there is a forger.


3 posted on 05/01/2013 8:14:23 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

misprint


4 posted on 05/01/2013 8:15:33 AM PDT by svcw (If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren't you alive when it starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

HO-LEE-CRAB!

This stinks so bad it makes me ill


5 posted on 05/01/2013 8:16:04 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
~ What Difference Does It Make ???!!! ~

 photo untitled_zpsbde99279.png

6 posted on 05/01/2013 8:17:38 AM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

It’s funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.

Since his signature law is Obamacare, that’ll be a big burden off America’s back, but considering his abysmal failures in most other legal endeavors, we probably won’t have much else to overturn.

Win-win!


7 posted on 05/01/2013 8:18:48 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Just one more reason for him to be walked from the office in an orange jump suit and then see some jail time but highly unlikely in both.

8 posted on 05/01/2013 8:19:04 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

The ‘non-lethal’ version of Arkanacide by the Klintoonistas?


9 posted on 05/01/2013 8:19:06 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was lost but now I'm found; blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
"All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a “birther issue.” It’s not. It’s a criminal issue. It’s a national security issue. "

That's right this is about greatest case of Criminal FRAUD in the history of America!

10 posted on 05/01/2013 8:20:16 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

a good investigative reporter would get a complete life story on this guy in a matter of weeks , toooo bad investigative reporters are all dead or retired


11 posted on 05/01/2013 8:21:15 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
Just one more reason for him to be walked from the office in an orange jump suit and then see some jail time but highly unlikely in both.

This is a fundamental point. If he was never qualified for office and attained it by fraud, then impeachment is not necessary. Numerous criminal complaints can be filed and enforced without the Executive and Constitutional shields.
12 posted on 05/01/2013 8:23:13 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
It’s funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.

Since his signature law is Obamacare, that’ll be a big burden off America’s back, but considering his abysmal failures in most other legal endeavors, we probably won’t have much else to overturn.

Win-win!

While I don't hold out much hope of it happening, if Obama were removed as ineligible, the biggest benefit would be the invalidation of his appointments on the Supreme Court. To paraphrase Howard Cosell - "Down goes Kagan! Down goes Sotomayor"

13 posted on 05/01/2013 8:24:40 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

All of his imperial edicts, “executive orders” would also be null and void. He would be liable for ALL expenses incurred on his lavish vacations.


14 posted on 05/01/2013 8:26:08 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (It's not "GUN CONTROL"! It's "PEOPLE CONTROL"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

General comment to all: This comes down to one thing ...

1: Apario is right
2: Obama is right.

The people screaming that birthers are a distraction and this is a non issue come in firmly on the Obama side. There is no other possibility.

Arpaio is a liar or he isn’t. And I know what side I’m on. Fellow ‘birthers’ should consider the above when encountering naysayers on conservative websites.


15 posted on 05/01/2013 8:26:21 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.

I don't see that happening. Not in this gimme, gimme, gimme, culture.

16 posted on 05/01/2013 8:26:46 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
I still cannot understand why the birther movement didn't just skip all of this and cut to the chase: the laws of the United States, at the time of his birth, made Obama a citizen of the United Kingdom. Therefore, he is ineligible to be President. Period. Every court filing his side has made provides primi facie evidence of this. It is not in dispute. I just don't get it.
17 posted on 05/01/2013 8:26:51 AM PDT by alancarp (Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

$10-$15 along with an official request from B.H.O. to Hawaii’s Dept of Health could clear this whole matter up very quickly. Well, Barry, how ‘bout it? Let’s see your cards.


18 posted on 05/01/2013 8:27:15 AM PDT by JPG (Stay strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

19 posted on 05/01/2013 8:28:25 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I hope this is one of those red line, game changing, gitmo closing, Benghazi stand downing, Reggie Love groping, ice cream slurping, eat your peas happenings.

What a legacy this guy will have? A ruin of the world's best healthcare system, Arab Springs stocking up Jihadis with sarin and anthrax, Fast-n-furious on a global scale, RU-486 over the counter to little girls, state paid terrorists running willy-nilly with one branch of government battling the other to make a living off our taxes to keep them here, and 397 days of vacation................

The media has pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes on the public of all time. They legitimized and elected us a president who they groomed and coddled for six years in order to turn their programming into a Jerry Springer meets Mike Wallace telethon for the last four years of his term. Obama's only safe harbor from their relentless to come papercuts -n-salt party is to blow shit up, his preference being in the the lands of bible clingers and gun toters.

20 posted on 05/01/2013 8:28:35 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
"there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed."

So do we repeal them in order to find out what's in them too!

21 posted on 05/01/2013 8:30:48 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

What is the graphic which only appears as a grayish square?
I am unable to enlarge it, to view it.
Simply put two birth certificates that are different, one is fake.
I thinks its funny that some people buy the race of the father as “African”, it should have been “Negro”.


22 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:00 AM PDT by svcw (If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren't you alive when it starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Allen West “The Obama administration is indeed aiding, enabling, and abetting our enemy thread
23 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:16 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

Bread and circuses. A bunch of distraction created to cloud the real issue.

Fact: All the people in Congress KNOW the truth. The CIA has files on everyone who runs for office.

Thus every person in Congress is complicit. Legally.

That is a problem.

So they do the show you see, drag it out with side issues that can be fought and claim it’s ‘settled science and old news” when anyone brings up the real issue...because most people don’t KNOW the real issue. Thus anyone with a clue is mocked and made to look like a ‘Truther”.


24 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:40 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“It’s funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.”

I hear you but given the current environment who would force such a constitutional crisis besides maybe a handful of House members? Unfortunately the bread and circuses would continue. Nothing would happen.

Having said that we should never give up and we should document the truth - whatever it is - and get it in the public record. Maybe someone someday may give a rip and be able to use it.


25 posted on 05/01/2013 8:32:24 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh, he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....


26 posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:13 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The longer we wait, the more it’ll hurt. With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed. Americans are tough, we’ll get through.

I do agree with you, however. No one has the spine to push this issue.


27 posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:31 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Yes good point. If a crime was committed than criminal prosecution of specific crimes may be more effective. Same approach used to bring down the mob.


28 posted on 05/01/2013 8:38:36 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Stripes and pink underwear. It would be my pleasure!


29 posted on 05/01/2013 8:39:19 AM PDT by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Patriots should never give up on this fight. Regardless if the fraud serves his whole four years, it’s the most stark example of how our ruling class is corrupt beyond redemption. They must be brought down.


30 posted on 05/01/2013 8:42:53 AM PDT by kreitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool; EXCH54FE

isthisnickcool wrote:

This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh,he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....”

This concerned me also, but this time we have judge Moore.

So there may be a chance that klayman gets this one.

(FRmail incoming)


31 posted on 05/01/2013 8:43:34 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
He would be liable for ALL expenses incurred on his lavish vacations.

This one alone would be worth it.

32 posted on 05/01/2013 8:44:01 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (As long as America's tolerence of failure is not overwhelmed by a desire to succeed, we will fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”


Yeah, Judicial Watch and Klayman are like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.

We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.


33 posted on 05/01/2013 8:46:16 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

“So do we repeal them in order to find out what’s in them too!”

That there is funny.

I’ll see you and raise you one.

At this point what does it matter?


34 posted on 05/01/2013 8:48:30 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

There would be all the EOs


35 posted on 05/01/2013 8:50:27 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

didn’t Pelosi certify this birth ce4rtificate? What about arresting her too?


36 posted on 05/01/2013 8:55:57 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed.”

Judges appointed by a usurper must be objected to in pre-trial phase. After the verdict or ruling, the De Facto Officer Doctrine kicks in to protect the Federal government from chaos and disruption.

Legislation signed into law by a usurper can be objected to individually if specific adverse action is applied to the individual. For example, the IRS assesses an individual taxpayer a tax for not obtaining and maintaining a healthcare insurance policy. The individual can object to the tax assessment on the basis the law was signed by a usurper and does not apply to them because they object to laws signed by the usurper. The law remains ineffect for everyone else, but the IRS cannot tax the individual who formally objects after an assessment.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 8:56:48 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Oh, I think he was groomed FAR longer than 6 years...


38 posted on 05/01/2013 9:02:59 AM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Go to guidestar.org and sign up. Read the Judicial Watch IRS filings for a few years and you will figure out what the deal is with them.

The amazing thing is that they have always been a “NONPROFIT” which to me is a joke. I expect that Klayman’s latest outfit, Freedom Watch, is no different than JW. Lots of noise, lots of fundraising, lots of nothing...


39 posted on 05/01/2013 9:06:42 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

“””“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”
Yeah, Judicial Watch and Klayman are like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.

We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.””””

Yup, times a million.


40 posted on 05/01/2013 9:07:02 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
-- there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed. --

The courts have a widget for that, called the "de facto officer doctrine." Nothing would be undone.

The people ought to boot the entirety of Congress out on its ear, for failing to discuss the ramifications of dual citizenship at birth, and noting that dual citizenship at birth can be synonymous with "natural born citizen" of the US. The reason the conversation didn't happen is that Congress is uncomfortable with that conversation, Congress knows that some fraction of the public would not agree with a finding that a dual citizen by birth and natural born citizen are the same thing, so it just flat out ignored the point.

Damned elite pricks have wrecked the country in so many ways.

41 posted on 05/01/2013 9:12:30 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

stfu de facto officer doctrine does not apply


42 posted on 05/01/2013 9:15:04 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Excellent picture! Interesting that the taller guard looks like Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, a centre-right mayor, in a lefty city, constantly under attack by Canadian media and communist city coucellors.


43 posted on 05/01/2013 9:18:12 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was lost but now I'm found; blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Question! How would Obama’s appointment of SC justices play against the USA Senate approval i.e. advice and consent?


44 posted on 05/01/2013 9:19:54 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

“stfu de facto officer doctrine does not apply”

The De Facto Officer Doctrine does apply to judicial rulings and verdicts from a judge appointed by a usurper unless there is an objection lodged pre-trial.

The Congress and the Court will not interfere with the people’s right to elect a usurper as their leader and Commander-in-Chief. But, an individual can object to adverse action taken against them for following or adhereing to a law signed by a usurper if they make their objection known before trial.

Obama supporters may not object to the Affordable Care and Protection Act signed by Obama. But those who do object, can opt out by objecting when adverse action is taken against them.

Elections have consquences. But, you can opt out if the leader is a usurper.


45 posted on 05/01/2013 9:26:26 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Is there a simple explanation for these differences? To me it looks like the different versions were taken on different security paper. If they were scanned from an original, then there should be minor difference between them. If they were scanned from a copy, they could be the same. One looks like it's a copy of copy which could easily explain the edge difference.

Multiple images that look the same but with different attributes, actually give weight to verity of the COLB and the fact that there is a real "mother" document. If so, where is it?

As for the layers, what's missing is the voice of the expert. Or maybe the voice is there, but it's lost in the noise. This would take deep technical knowledge and experience. For example, I have deep knowledge of one of the Office applications, and know things about it that are difficult to explain to casual users. With this background, to me the layers in themselves aren't evidence of anything. In fact, if 2 of the images have massively different layers, it would seem to be that they were scanned by different devices or used different applications. If only one layer is different, that would seem to be an electronic modification. A lot of the excitement may be from people who don't understand how scanning works. Since I don't know, and have the voice of someone who really does, I have to without judgment.

Of course, with so much related to BO being a lie and hot air, there's a real tendency to expect everything is that way. There's so much in his background that disqualifies him, but the liberals and blacks want him. People have stopped praying enough and BO is the consequence of a largely backslidden nation.

46 posted on 05/01/2013 9:28:07 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Apparently you are a rabid, psychotic, delusional birther! </sarc>

Seriously great article! Thanks for posting, bro!

To borrow a quote from Obama's long time friend, Bill Ayers: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird."

Justice will be done. Hopefully soon.

Just a personal thought on the subject. Obama would sell us out and see America destroyed before he would give up the Presidency. (Oh wait, he's almost there now.)

From the article:

"All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a “birther issue.” It’s not. It’s a criminal issue. It’s a national security issue. My fellow Americans, the Democrats are telling on themselves left and right. They are openly lying to you about the man in the Oval Office and everyone thinks there is something more important? I don’t think so. Yes Benghazi is important. Yes, Fast and Furious is important. However, it appears that for the first time we have a man in the White House that we cannot really say is even from this country and apparently there is some serious felonies taking place in attempts to cover up what should be the biggest story covered in America and that is to expose a usurper to the office of President of the United States.

In case you are still thinking this doesn’t matter, might I suggest you consider how this would impact things, versus impeachment for Benghazi or Fast and Furious? Understand that this would potentially nullify every law he has signed, every executive order he has given, and every Supreme Court appointment he has made. While many are saying that Benghazi is bigger than Watergate, and it most definitely is, the Obama eligibility issue is bigger than all Obama’s scandals, in my opinion, because of the tentacles around things that it affects."

47 posted on 05/01/2013 9:29:03 AM PDT by Perseverando (The truth is hate to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

3 different Obama birf certificates submitted to the court.

One from the AL Dem party. Number 2 from an Obot FogBlower and 3 the White House birf cert.


48 posted on 05/01/2013 9:30:33 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Differences indicate forgeries - that’s all there is to it.


49 posted on 05/01/2013 9:31:19 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Anyone in the GOP Media and Talk shows....who continue to ignore and attack Obama Eligibility issues....are nothing more than Obama Supporters. That is the real issue here.

We have another Phony Obama Birth Cert.....and yet we will get hours of “Michelle has a big butt” from Obama Supporter PhonyCon media


50 posted on 05/01/2013 9:33:16 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson