Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mathematicians Solve 140-year-old Boltzmann Equation
Scientific Computing ^ | 2010 | unattributed

Posted on 05/24/2010 5:23:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

Mathematicians have found solutions to a 140-year-old, seven-dimensional equation that were not known to exist for more than a century, despite its widespread use in modeling the behavior of gases. During the late 1860s and 1870s, physicists James Clerk Maxwell and Ludwig Boltzmann developed this equation to predict how gaseous material distributes itself in space and how it responds to changes in things like temperature, pressure or velocity. Solutions of the equation, beyond current computational capabilities, describe the location of gas molecules probabilistically and predict the likelihood that a molecule will reside at any particular location and have a particular momentum at any given time in the future...

Gressman and Strain were intrigued by this mysterious equation that illustrated the behavior of the physical world, yet for which its discoverers could only find solutions for gasses in perfect equilibrium. Using modern mathematical techniques from the fields of partial differential equations and harmonic analysis -- many of which were developed during the last five to 50 years and, thus, are relatively new to mathematics -- the Penn mathematicians proved the global existence of classical solutions and rapid time decay to equilibrium for the Boltzmann equation with long-range interactions. Global existence and rapid decay imply that the equation correctly predicts that the solutions will continue to fit the system's behavior and not undergo any mathematical catastrophes, such as a breakdown of the equation's integrity caused by a minor change within the equation. Rapid decay to equilibrium means that the effect of an initial small disturbance in the gas is short-lived and quickly becomes unnoticeable.

(Excerpt) Read more at scientificcomputing.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; jamesclerkmaxwell; ludwigboltzmann
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: SunkenCiv
What is the mean temperature.
21 posted on 05/24/2010 6:36:24 PM PDT by 23 Everest (Take Back Your Country This November! If That Don't Work We'll Do It The 2nd AMD Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Mark for mathematical reference


22 posted on 05/24/2010 6:42:03 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

you lost me after ‘seven dimensional equation’.


23 posted on 05/24/2010 6:45:55 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Hate it when that happens. And it’s not covered by my homeowner’s policy, either.


24 posted on 05/24/2010 6:46:48 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (70 mph shouldn't be a speed limit; it shoud be a mandate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
So, is it gonna rain tomorrow?

Hey if they can figure this out, they can figure that out!

25 posted on 05/24/2010 6:50:39 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you, O you most proud, said the Lord God of hosts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I can see that sometimes, Moe Howard had the right idea! ;’)

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...


26 posted on 05/24/2010 7:00:52 PM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Filly-bust-her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: djf

My understanding is the “4-color map” question was answered in a brute force way, and not so much as proof.


27 posted on 05/24/2010 7:05:13 PM PDT by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

I think it was done via computer.


28 posted on 05/24/2010 7:21:16 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Thanks,Sunken.

(Sound of grey_whiskers purring *and* kneading biscuits with his velvet paws.)

Cheers!

29 posted on 05/24/2010 7:37:32 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David; Myrddin; Robert A. Cook, PE; AFPhys; Wonder Warthog; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
Like, *PING*, dudes and dude-ettes.

Cheers!

30 posted on 05/24/2010 7:39:13 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

>> When they solve Fermat’s last theorem, call me.

Are theorems solved, or proven not to be false?


31 posted on 05/24/2010 7:42:34 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Interesting. Thanx !
32 posted on 05/24/2010 7:52:28 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (America should take a mulligan on the 2008 presidential election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Their job was to prove that the set of test cases they created was complete, and that the computer algorithm exhaustively examined those cases.

There were several small corrections and refinements of the proof in subsequent years.


33 posted on 05/24/2010 8:58:19 PM PDT by Erasmus (Looks like we're between a lithic outcropping and a region of low compressibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
I think that increasing numbers of proofs over the past couple of centuries have relied on reductio ad absurdum.
34 posted on 05/24/2010 9:02:32 PM PDT by Erasmus (Looks like we're between a lithic outcropping and a region of low compressibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Have you ever met anyone who didn’t hate Transport? I enjoyed wisdom teeth pulling more.


35 posted on 05/24/2010 9:04:15 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Thanks for the ping!


36 posted on 05/24/2010 10:01:05 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey; Hoodat

Transport. Been there, done that. I’m not sure which I liked less, Transport or Thermodynamics.

Tough call.

(BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State)


37 posted on 05/25/2010 6:22:45 AM PDT by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
I actually enjoyed both semesters of Thermo and the first semester of transport, but Transport II sucked. The class I hated the most because of the workload was Separations. And the class which totally baffled me was Process Control, which is ironic since that is now what I do for a living.

NC State has good engineering as does my school - Georgia Tech.

38 posted on 05/25/2010 6:41:42 AM PDT by Hoodat (.For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

When I was in school, the Process Control (equivalent) class in the Mechanical Engineering school was an acceptable substitute for ChE majors.

Most, like me, took it because it was easier (or the professor made it seem that way).

The labs in ChE were a PITA, because of the time it took. Looking back I don’t know why I was in such a hurry. I should have gone slower and appreciated the experience more.


39 posted on 05/25/2010 7:35:57 AM PDT by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Transport. Been there, done that. I’m not sure which I liked less, Transport or Thermodynamics.

Tough call.

(BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State)

Transport hands down. All theory, no pratical application. That came with Thermo, Mass Transfer and the labs. (BS ChE - UF; MS ChE - Lamar University)


40 posted on 05/25/2010 10:18:06 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson