Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andes Mountains Are Older Than Previously Believed
ScienceDaily ^ | Sunday, May 17, 2009 | Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, via EurekAlert!

Posted on 05/25/2009 4:20:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

The geologic faults responsible for the rise of the eastern Andes mountains in Colombia became active 25 million years ago -- 18 million years before the previously accepted start date for the Andes' rise, according to researchers at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama, the University of Potsdam in Germany and Ecopetrol in Colombia...

The team integrated new geologic maps that illustrate tectonic thrusting and faulting, information about the origins and movements of sediments and the location and age of plant pollen in the sediments, as well as zircon-fission track analysis to provide an unusually thorough description of basin and range formation.

As mountain ranges rise, rainfall and erosion wash minerals like zircon from rocks of volcanic origin into adjacent basins, where they accumulate to form sedimentary rocks. Zircon contains traces of uranium. As the uranium decays, trails of radiation damage accumulate in the zircon crystals. At high temperatures, fission tracks disappear like the mark of a knife disappears from a soft block of butter. By counting the microscopic fission tracks in zircon minerals, researchers can tell how long ago sediments formed and how deeply they were buried.

Classification of nearly 17,000 pollen grains made it possible to clearly delimit the age of sedimentary layers.

The use of these complementary techniques led the team to postulate that the rapid advance of a sinking wedge of material as part of tectonic events 31 million years ago may have set the stage for the subsequent rise of the range.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: andes; catastrophism; ecuador; peru; tiahuanaco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2009 4:20:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

2 posted on 05/25/2009 4:21:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
The geologic faults responsible for the rise of the eastern Andes mountains in Colombia became active 25 million years ago -- 18 million years before the previously accepted start date for the Andes' rise, according to researchers at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama,

Just to be clear here. These "researchers" are scientists, right?

As in, scientists say the earth is warming. Scientists say evolution is real, etc.

3 posted on 05/25/2009 4:22:59 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Well they’re older than me.


4 posted on 05/25/2009 4:30:57 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Well at least these “researchers”, as in scientiests, know where the 6000 year time line is located in a 25 million year old deposit of sediment.


5 posted on 05/25/2009 4:32:24 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
...the rapid advance of a sinking wedge of material as part of tectonic events 31 million years ago may have set the stage for the subsequent rise of the range.

Hmmm...I have that sinking feeling they are trying to say subduction without really saying it. And I want to know what CAUSED the rapid advance of a sinking wedge of material because it sounds like a lot of energy would be required. But I'm not a 'scientist' so I guess I'll just have to take their word for it. Like H*ell I will.

6 posted on 05/25/2009 4:35:49 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

No sheeet, Eh???
7 posted on 05/25/2009 4:36:18 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It’s easy to find fault with geologists.


8 posted on 05/25/2009 4:37:26 PM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Andies Mountains, Chile


9 posted on 05/25/2009 4:51:29 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

isn’t there an ancient seaport that was found high up in the Andes?


10 posted on 05/25/2009 4:55:59 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Do you want a President or a King?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Stop being such a sedimentalist.


11 posted on 05/25/2009 5:01:33 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory; Fred Nerks

Tiahuanaco, but it wasn’t a seaport, it was a port on the lake, but there’s probably more to come from Fred Nerks on that topic.


12 posted on 05/25/2009 5:01:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: relictele
that calls for...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

13 posted on 05/25/2009 5:08:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

The candies are much younger than this.


14 posted on 05/25/2009 5:09:08 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

you mean the Lemurians have been lying to me? :o


15 posted on 05/25/2009 5:22:33 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Do you want a President or a King?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Is everyone in Texas an idiot or just you?


16 posted on 05/25/2009 5:27:04 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Tiahuanacu (also called Tiwanaku) is a mystery because of its age (estimated to be 17,000 years) and the peculiar stone technology. LINK

Puma Punku, truly startles the imagination. It seems to be the remains of a great wharf (for Lake Titicaca long ago lapped upon the shores of Tiahuanaco) and a massive, four-part, now collapsed building. One of the construction blocks from which the pier was fashioned weighs an estimated 440 tons (equal to nearly 600 full-size cars) and several other blocks laying about are between 100 and 150 tons. The quarry for these giant blocks was on the western shore of Titicaca, some ten miles away. There is no known technology in all the ancient world that could have transported stones of such massive weight and size. The Andean people of 500 AD, with their simple reed boats, could certainly not have moved them. Even today, with all the modern advances in engineering and mathematics, we could not fashion such a structure.

Puma Punku ruins, Tiahuanaco, Bolivia

Source: Jean-Pierre Protzen & Stella E.Nair, “On Reconstructing Tiwanaku Architecture”, Jpurnal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 59, Nr.3, 2000, pp. 358-371

pssst...'they' didn't have to carry it anywhere...IT'S CONCRETE!

17 posted on 05/25/2009 5:48:55 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

By my calculations, they are about 4300 years old.


18 posted on 05/25/2009 6:09:35 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I think that’s a big /bingo.


19 posted on 05/25/2009 6:19:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

The Primates of Lemuria are probably trustworthy.


20 posted on 05/25/2009 6:21:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson