Skip to comments.
IBM Scientists "Quiet" Unruly Electrons in Atomic Layers of Graphite
Marketwatch ^
| March 6, 2008
| Michael Loughran IBM
Posted on 03/06/2008 9:02:41 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Atomic-Sized Graphene Double Layer Holds Nanoelectronics Promise
YORKTOWN HEIGHTS, NY, Mar 06, 2008 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- IBM
Researchers today announced a discovery that combats one of the industry's most perplexing problems in using graphite -- the same material found inside pencils -- as a material for building nanoelectonic circuits vastly smaller than those found in today's silicon based computer chips.
For the first time anywhere, IBM scientists have found a way to suppress unwanted interference of electrical signals created when shrinking graphene, a two-dimensional, single-atomic layer thick form of graphite, to dimensions just a few atoms long.
Scientists around the world are exploring the use of graphene as a much smaller replacement for today's silicon transistors. Graphene is a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice of carbon atoms, similar to atomic-scale chicken-wire, which has attracted strong scientific and technological interest because it exhibits promising electrical properties and could be used in transistors and circuits at scales vastly smaller than components inside of today's tiniest computer chips.
One problem in using these nano-devices is the inverse relationship between the size of the device and the amount of uncontrolled electrical noise that is generated: as they are made smaller and smaller, the noise -- electrical charges that bounce around the material causing all sorts of interference that impede their usefulness -- grows larger and larger. This trend is known as Hooge's rule, and occurs in traditional silicon based devices as well as in graphene nano-ribbons and carbon nanotube based devices.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: graphene; hitech; nanotech; stringtheory
To: ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
3
posted on
03/06/2008 9:03:54 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
HEY YOU DAMN UNRULY ELECTRONS! STAY OFF MY LAWN!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“In their experiments, the IBM Researchers first used a single layer, or sheet, of graphene to build a transistor and noted that the device does in fact follow Hooge’s Rule: as they are made smaller and smaller, there is an increase in the noise that is created.
Two Layers Are Better Than One
However, when the IBM Researchers built the same device with two sheets of graphene instead of one — one stacked on top of the other — they noted that the noise is suppressed, and is weak enough that these so-called bilayer graphene ribbons could prove useful for building future semiconductor devices for use in sensors, communications devices, computing systems and more. The noise is inhibited because of the strong electronic coupling between the two graphene layers that counteracts the influence of the noise sources: the system acts as a noise insulator.”
Thereby making the “smallest” twice as big.
5
posted on
03/06/2008 9:34:11 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; ...
No wonder I can't sleep nights. ;') Thanks Ernest.
Not string-theory (or at least, not much), but probably of interest.
6
posted on
03/06/2008 9:39:41 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The noise is inhibited because of the strong electronic coupling between the two graphene layers that counteracts the influence of the noise sources: the system acts as a noise insulator. Sounds something like atomic-level twisted-pair wire. :-)
7
posted on
03/06/2008 10:50:21 AM PST
by
TChris
("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
To: SunkenCiv
8
posted on
03/06/2008 1:34:39 PM PST
by
brivette
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
9
posted on
03/06/2008 1:44:40 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. It’s a SOCON Site.)
To: snarks_when_bored; RightWhale
Like, *PING*, dudes.
Cheers!
10
posted on
03/06/2008 4:42:13 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
I imagine the engineering formulas for these devices are going to be awesome. They’ll hit that about the junior year in EE. Won’t be pretty.
11
posted on
03/06/2008 4:47:27 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
To: SunkenCiv
Physics are funadamental this side of God.
12
posted on
03/06/2008 4:59:42 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
Physics are funadamental this side of God. Kronecker (of Kronecker delta fame) is reported to have said, "God created the integers. All else is the work of man."
Cheers!
13
posted on
03/06/2008 5:55:42 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson