Obviously that area was not covered by ice back then, so what caused that warming since there was no industrialization and SUVs?
So—do they get to put the “global warming” signs back up in Glacier National Park?
https://nypost.com/2020/01/10/the-telling-tale-of-glacier-national-parks-gone-by-2020-signs/
I’m waiting for them to find a frozen Neanderthal. That will be interesting.
Artifacts melting from under ice shows that ice coverage was less at the time the artifacts were left. What do the global warmists have to say.......
PinGGG!...................
“although a disturbing factor of a much larger global warming effect”
So, in 300AD this area must have been free of ice. Just like Greenland was when Lief Erickson went there and established a settlement. Then it got colder and covered with ice. What caused the Earth to get colder? Then it got warmer. Maybe it has absolutely nothing to do with “greenhouse gases” such as CO2.
Did you write that Paul?
I guess the Vikings had to ban industrialization, use of coal, oil, stop using internal combustion engines because of all the global warming they were causing. Did they find one of their polluting SUVs buried in the now melting ice?
Wow! It is so amazing that even Trump supporting Neanderthals can all arrive at the same conclusion about the probable lack of ice at the time the artifacts were deposited in 300 AD. The same can be asked about Greenland back when the Vikings chose to inhabit the island.
This sort of thing provides good evidence that a COOLING TREND occurred in the fairly recent past.
It does NOT provide evidence that we are in a warming trend which should be a cause for concern.
It also does NOT provide any evidence that WE cause climate chance. If anything, it is evidence for the opposite.
More glacial melt, although a disturbing factor of a much larger global warming effect...
I stopped reading right after “although a disturbing factor of a much larger global warming effect”.
I’ve been flamed before for comments like this by the FR Nazi’s, go ahead, make my day!
So it took 1700 years to start melting?
Guess that “climate change” thing is real.
IOW, Global Freeze caused the artifacts to be covered with ice and snow.
In other words, in 300 AD not only was it warmer than today, there was a culture that thrived in that warm and benefitted from it.
The author finds this ‘disturbing?’
More glacial melt, although a disturbing factor of a much larger global warming effect...
What’s a 2,000 year old boat doing inside a glacier except 2,000 years ago it was warmer.
You mean, the glacier had receded prior to 300AD when there were no cars, no coal fired power plants, no chemical plants and chemicals that destroyed the ozone.... Then the un woke Vikings moved in...
Just how can that happen?
Love the repeated reference to global warming, and as has been noted on some previous comments - this shows that things were much warmer when these objects were left. Hmmmmmm, now somehow civilization, plants, animals and (ptui ptui) even left leaning idiots existed back then also, not?
Obviously not because such well eddikated pepes such as the media and politicians have told me so. And, of course, I’ll believe them because.
“is the discoveries of artifacts from the Viking era on the hills that were once used for transportation purposes dated back to 300 A.D. as per the study”
So where were the gas guzzling SUVs spewing CO2 before 300 AD. Those gas guzzling SUVs spewing CO2 must have been around, or how else could that land have not been covered by glaciers around 300 AD??? /sarc
Kinda like roads melting faster after a snow fall than the lawns and fields.....