Posted on 09/21/2019 9:28:36 AM PDT by grundle
Bethany Vierra was born in Washington state.
She got a master’s degree in Middle Eastern studies from the American University in Paris.
Then she got a PhD in human rights at the National University of Ireland.
With such an education, I would think that Vierra would be aware that women in Saudi Arabia didn’t have the same rights as men, and that this lack of equal rights was due to the country following Islamic law.
But I would be wrong.
Vierra moved to Saudi Arabia, married a Saudi Arabian man, and later gave birth – while in Saudi Arabia – to their daughter.
Since doing those things, Vierra and her husband have gotten a divorce, and are now involved in a custody dispute over their daughter.
During this custody dispute, Vierra was genuinely shocked to find out that under Islamic law (also known as Sharia law) in Saudi Arabia, women do not have the same rights as men. Here’s the obligatory “shocked” scene from the movie Casablanca:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME
Vierra was also surprised to find out that she was not allowed to leave Saudi Arabia or to access her own bank account, without her ex-husband’s permission.
During the custody dispute, some of the evidence that was used against Vierra were photographs which showed that she had worn a bikini in public, had worn yoga pants in public, and had had her hair uncovered in public.
And Vierra said of this:
“The problem here is not Islamic law.”
Relative to their level of education, I don’t think I’ve ever heard of anyone as dumb as Bethany Vierra.
Instead of getting all of those useless college degrees, she should have watched the movie Not Without My Daughter. The movie is based on a true story. Here’s the trailer for it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TSmbayUJCo
And here’s a scene from it about how the country enforces its dress code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm3xv5sosng
Meanwhile, back in the U.S., a woman named Linda Sarsour, who was born in Brooklyn, New York, made four tweets in favor of the U.S. adopting Sharia law.
Sarsour made this tweet, which says the following:
“10 weeks of PAID maternity leave in Saudi Arabia. Yes PAID. And ur worrying about women driving. Puts us to shame.”
She also made this tweet, which says:
“shariah law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics”
and this tweet, which says:
“You’ll know when you’re living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn’t it?”
and this tweet, which says:
“If you are still paying interest than Sharia Law hasn’t taken over America.”
These statements prove that Sarsour wants the U.S. to adopt Sharia law.
Sharia law bans women from driving cars, prohibits women from appearing alone in public, calls for girls to have their genitals mutilated, and gives a woman’s testimony in court only half the value of a man’s.
After Sarsour made those four tweets in favor of the U.S. adopting Sharia law, left wing American feminists chose her to be one of the organizers of the 2017 Women’s March.
But any movement which truly cared about women’s rights would not support someone who wants the U.S. to treat women in such a horrible and repulsive manner.
I will say one positive thing about Sarsour: even though Sarsour claims to believe in Sharia law, and says that women in Saudi Arabia are better off than women in the U.S., at least she is not dumb enough to actually move to Saudi Arabia.
Sounds like “Not Without My Daughter 2”
years and years to get a PhD.
Minutes of travelling in a foreign country to realize everything you learned and everything you insisted was true is a delusional lie
If you say:
Islam Is RIGHT About Women!
Then you are guilty of hate speech. On the other hand, if you say
Islam Is WRONG About Women!
Then you are guilty of hate speech.
Go figure!
Thanks to eyeamok for posting this “Drive the Liberal Women even crazier!
How about: “Islam is right about dogs”?
Talking about confusion, that would bring a hellish wrath of indignation upon Islam.
13 posted on 9/21/2019, 6:26:38 AM by nathanbedford
If Islamic law isn’t the problem, then what is?
Stupid is SUPPOSED to hurt.
Idiot. Too bad they had a kid to pollute the gene pool.
Now this woman is a dumb ass.
I wish the author would have included if the woman is registered to vote and, if so, what party she aligns herself with? And who she voted for in whatever elections she was allowed to vote in. And who she supports in the upcoming election.
Hopefully, she’ll get loony and cause the Saudi’s to put her in jail. Let her get a taste for that side of life.........ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
“If Islamic law isn’t the problem, then what is?”
Trump, duh!
She's proof that you don't have to be smart to get a PhD...
A stupid woman with brain dead parents.
She’s got a degree in ignorance.
She was probably an excellent student, and believed everything her dingbat professors told her...
I am sure she could quote parts of the Koran that supported her position—of course that would probably just get her locked up by Saudi authorities!
Darn near impossible to get a decent martini in Saudi either.
Book learning is fine and dandy for theory. Actual hands on work in the field or the street is something entirely different. Sounds like she’s stuck on stupid or just hard headed, Careful lady, you might get stoned to death over there.
Not without my daughter like number 300,002,432. It continues on. In Islime the children belong to the father and women are tilth in which to be plowed (paraphrasing from the qurap)
She’s no different than the “progressive wymyn” on numerous university campuses, who rushed off to Syria and Iraq to join the ISIS Jihad, when that was still a thing, and found themselves promptly turned into harem concubines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.