Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?
Headline of the Day ^

Posted on 06/11/2017 11:02:52 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler

Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?

Yes, the public wants to know if he obstructed justice. No, they are setting a perjury trap.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: poll; presidenttrump; senate; testify
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Jeff Chandler; 2ndDivisionVet; 45semi; afraidfortherepublic; A knight without armor; ...
Pres. Trump should not have said what he did. It will be a trap.

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!) And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

21 posted on 06/12/2017 3:09:26 AM PDT by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Hard to see doing so helping him.Bottom line is that for the next four years the MSM will run with this to sell papers and attract viewers.
22 posted on 06/12/2017 3:10:38 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

In normal times, as long as the Republicans control Congress, Trump wouldn’t be called upon to testify. But it just so happens that McCain, isn’t normal.


23 posted on 06/12/2017 3:21:27 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I would like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to testify first.


24 posted on 06/12/2017 3:48:19 AM PDT by jimfree (My16 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

And if Hitlery testifies on her pay for play scheme.


25 posted on 06/12/2017 4:07:48 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hillary Clinton IS a felon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
WHY? Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?
26 posted on 06/12/2017 4:18:35 AM PDT by gogeo (When your life is based on a false premise...you are indeed insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?

No, they are setting a perjury trap. (56%)

Yes, the public wants to know if he obstructed justice. (44%)


27 posted on 06/12/2017 4:23:00 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
if Obama testifies on Benghazi...

Hillary, too.

28 posted on 06/12/2017 4:23:55 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

As an alternative, let’s put the Committee members, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Rice, and McCain under oath and have them water-boarded live on CSPAN. Questioning them would be good, too.


29 posted on 06/12/2017 4:29:26 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Hell no, those political whores are out to take him down. He took a big step forward by dumping Comey, now he has a lot more to do to clean the swamp.


30 posted on 06/12/2017 4:53:01 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Absolutely not.


31 posted on 06/12/2017 5:04:42 AM PDT by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No. he is not the subject of the Russian investigation and testifying he would make him the subject of a Dem fishing expedition. Instead he should bore them to death with having his lawyer provide written answers to written interrogatories


32 posted on 06/12/2017 5:08:28 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Hell NO.


33 posted on 06/12/2017 5:13:35 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?

No, they are setting a perjury trap. (58%)

Yes, the public wants to know if he obstructed justice. (42%)


34 posted on 06/12/2017 5:41:30 AM PDT by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet (If it is to be, it's up to me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Should President Trump testify under oath to the Senate?

No, they are setting a perjury trap. (58%)
Yes, the public wants to know if he obstructed justice. (42%)


35 posted on 06/12/2017 5:46:05 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are Millwall and on Flight 93 for our country! Lets Roll! For Americans and President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

He could just pardon himself. That would save a lot of $. But since he has committed no crime why should he bother?


36 posted on 06/12/2017 5:50:07 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Hell no! “Dear Senate, F**K you! Nasty letter to follow...”


37 posted on 06/12/2017 6:07:47 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No, he should not testify, but not for that reason.

President Trump represents the executive branch, a separate branch from the legislative branch. The only time he should appear before congress is for the SOTU address, or to ask congress for a declaration of war.

If congress decides they must act against the POTUS, they have the singular means of impeachment and conviction along with removal from office. That is it.


38 posted on 06/12/2017 6:27:33 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Baizuo" A derogatory term the Chinese are using to describe America's naive "White Left")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
Option 3: No, he should dissolve the senate instead.

You forgot your < /sarc > tag (I hope).

39 posted on 06/12/2017 4:13:32 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

Red Headed Caesar???


40 posted on 06/12/2017 5:24:42 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson