Women in places like Afghanistan in the 1960's were not treated like second class citizens. IMO The rise of the 'Feminist Movement' in the West ruined it for them.
Posted on 04/23/2017 3:45:20 PM PDT by grundle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlvMAS_20K4
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I presume that by “quarterback”, you mean pastor or priest?
I bet most of them would turn out to be religious couples, too.
> Women don’t like to feel like they are being treated as property instead of equals.
I’ve never met a women happy with equality. It makes women miserable.
>Honestly, a man who lovingly leads is not going to have the rebellion issues. And if he does, it behooves him to find out why she’s feeling that way and *gasp* maybe even CHANGE something he’s doing.
BS. Rebellion is rebellion and the person responsible for that rebellion is the person rebelling. In one moment you go from women are equal to it’s all men’s fault when they’re women rebel. Classic feminists.
>If a husband is domineering she’s going to ‘naturally’ rebel against this....her desire is to be an ‘equal partner’ in a marriage....has nothing to do with her “behavior” as if she’s a child and needs discipline.
Women don’t desire equality. They desire domination and when they get it makes them unhappy because women are happiest when their man is superior to them.
>And btw...God never told the woman to “love’ her husband....he told the man that.....a woman was called to “respect” her husband and that sir..is earned.
No God told women to obey her husband. Feminist like you really hate that concept so you lie about it.
I personally did not see any defense of H-1B, globalism or the corporate scum in her statements.
/// That is because women are hypocritical about sexual strategies, inherently assuming theirs is totally moral and acceptable and guys strategies are just awful and base and primal. Theirs is the same but they don’t have a problem with theirs also being awful and base and primal. ///
The sexual strategy thing is a problem, because women often ignore younger guys or beta provider types when they are younger. Women have higher sexual-market-value (SMV) when they are younger and it declines with age.
Its a timing problem.
Men’s SMV tends to increase with age (which often correlates to wealth). So most women get to “party” at an earlier age than men, pissing off a lot of younger men who are passed over. Then when those younger men are older, it becomes THEIR turn to party with younger women.
Why should older men be expected to take in the age group of women who ignored them when they were younger? Or for that matter help raise some other guy’s kid conceived with some alpha dude back when she was riding the **** carousel?
Not my job.
Not within the household, no. The church is more like the assistant coaches, trainers, physical therapists, and ... cheerleaders! Which is why it is so important for men to be active in the church. Accountability and support using their spiritual gifts for the growth of the team.
I’ll have to get that analogy transferred to the military since we are at war spiritually, big time.
I don’t understand why people can’t figure out the man has yet to be born that will buy the cow when he can get the milk for free.
Agreed. Unlike women becoming more masculine, men becoming more feminine is a bigger problem, IMO, because masculine and feminine women alike will not desire them, leading to more incel. Meanwhile, some masculine men will still find a woman who works out hard attractive.
Some women could physically abuse their spouse but more often than not it’s psychological abuse. Both are horrible.
No tattoos!
Unless I'm mistaken, the Muslim mistreatment of women has been going on for over a thousand years. Feminism, not so much.
After seeing the rules of nature, the slanted and biased law, the overwhelming distorted abnormal guidelines being shoved down our throats in school and the culture, a complete RATIONAL response to it all would be to not get married.
Women in places like Afghanistan in the 1960's were not treated like second class citizens. IMO The rise of the 'Feminist Movement' in the West ruined it for them.
Absolutely correct.
Ah yes, this whole “no difference between the two” insanity. And it is insanity.
I don’t want to speak for him, but I believe some of what he’s saying here is intended to get a reaction.
I didn’t say it was all men’s fault.
You’re assuming there.
What about men who don’t behave properly?
What are the consequences for them?
And God also told men to love their wives as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it.
And that men are to treat their wives as they treat their own bodies, which they don't abuse but nurture and care for.
Women are not blind or stupid and they can see when that isn't happening.
There's a back and forth dynamic there and men are responsible to lead and have abdicated that role.
Or they turn into little petty tyrants in the home, demanding submission and the wife walks around on eggshells hoping to not tick him off so he doesn't blow a gasket at her.
EVERY complaint a man has about women's behavior can be said about men.
Not thin and attractive and when they were younger? Check.
Controlling and domineering? Check.
Think the world revolves around them and it's all the other's fault? Check.
Two very imperfect people get married and BOTH come into the marriage with baggage and BOTH need to work together to deal with it.
It's a rare couple I've met who are so compatible that they say they don't have any problems.
The rest who stay together are just mature enough to have figured out how to work through it TOGETHER.
Not he commands and she submits.
After getting an earful of “all men are rapists/predators/oppressors”, including the outrageous idea that even incidental contact constitutes sexual assault, I decided that it wasn’t worth the risk. It was as bad as a divorce.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.