Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here’s How “President Hillary” Will Destroy Your Gun Rights Without Repealing The Second Amendment
bearingarms.com ^ | Aug. 17, 2016 | Bob Owens

Posted on 08/17/2016 4:39:12 PM PDT by PROCON


Hillary Clinton is running the first presidential campaign in the history of the United States based explicitly on the gutting of a core Constitutional and human right.

Clinton has made attacking the human right of self-defense a key part of her 2016 campaign, and if she’s elected—and down-ballot Democrats manage to take control of the Senate and/or House—she’s poised to be able to destroy the gun rights of American citizens in three distinct ways.

-Place progressive, anti-gun justices on the Supreme Court

-Pass bans on a wide range of common firearms

-repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)

~SNIP~

I will tell you that if she is elected, Hillary Clinton will seek to destroy not just your right, but your ability to own, trade, and shoot the most common firearms in the United States.

All of them, without exception.

This includes your bolt-action deer rifle, your pump shotgun, your grandfather’s heirloom revolver, the pistol you purchased for self defense, and the little .22 rifle you learned to shoot as a kid.

Consider yourself warned, and vote strategically to protect the Constitution and the right to bear arms against the most dangerous and corrupt candidate to ever be nominated for President.

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016election; banglist; guncontrol; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: plain talk

Which is why, if it comes to it, the rest of America may have to chose between knuckling under or finally killing them. Spooky scenario.


21 posted on 08/17/2016 6:53:20 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
This isn’t the Soviet Union.

Yet. But they're working on it tirelessly.

22 posted on 08/17/2016 6:55:01 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“Again, where do they think they can find people who they can pay enough to finally give millions of pissed of Americans someone to shoot?”

You’ll never get a logical answer from FR’s comicbook readers. My favorites are these two:

1) 20 ChiComm divisions are hiding in shipping containers at the Oakland port.

2) The fat, potato chip eating affirmative action jellyfish in the federal bureaucracy will metamorphise into cold-steel Rambo killers and wipe out everyone who resists.


23 posted on 08/17/2016 7:03:35 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73
*NOTHING* can be read, in the 2nd, let alone the whole of the Constitution, to grant govt authority to trample upon this, or any, Right(s).

Says who? You? You don't count. :-) In this era we live in now ... liberals can screw around with the meaning of words and appear to get away with it. The 2nd amendment wording will not be a problem for them with the right screwballs in the SC. We are 1-2 SC justice away from that happening.

24 posted on 08/17/2016 7:06:55 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Go sleep it off, PROCON. You’re making no sense.


25 posted on 08/17/2016 7:08:30 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

That second one is a knee slapper.


26 posted on 08/17/2016 8:19:47 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

>
Says who? You? You don’t count. :-) In this era we live in now ... liberals can screw around with the meaning of words and appear to get away with it. The 2nd amendment wording will not be a problem for them with the right screwballs in the SC. We are 1-2 SC justice away from that happening.
>

Liberals? Has anyone heard anything from the “(C)”\GOP\RNC mouths these days? Can’t say I’ve heard much about our REPUBLIC in *years*. How bout Freedom or Liberty? Sure, ‘radical Islamic jihad’ (nice political jab)...while our border is WIDE OPEN [and they lament the ‘dreamers’ (aka illegal [criminal] alien invaders)]. “We gotta strengthen our govt promises of SS\MediXYZ...” WTF?! *MIGHT* want to consult the Constitution *first*, no? But, I digress.

When the time comes, I suspect we’ll need 1-2M+ civil, armed and ready, Citizens showing up on the steps of SCOTUS\Congress to assist to...re-think their opinion.

At least, I HOPE. I see nothing less than blood shed otherwise to *attempt* to restore that which was lost.


27 posted on 08/18/2016 5:30:35 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson