Here’s How “President Hillary” Will Destroy Your Gun Rights Without Repealing The Second Amendment

bearingarms.com ^ | Aug. 17, 2016 | Bob Owens

[PROCON]

Hillary Clinton is running the first presidential campaign in the history of the United States based explicitly on the gutting of a core Constitutional and human right.

Clinton has made attacking the human right of self-defense a key part of her 2016 campaign, and if she’s elected—and down-ballot Democrats manage to take control of the Senate and/or House—she’s poised to be able to destroy the gun rights of American citizens in three distinct ways.

-Place progressive, anti-gun justices on the Supreme Court

-Pass bans on a wide range of common firearms

-repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)

~SNIP~

I will tell you that if she is elected, Hillary Clinton will seek to destroy not just your right, but your ability to own, trade, and shoot the most common firearms in the United States.

All of them, without exception.

This includes your bolt-action deer rifle, your pump shotgun, your grandfather’s heirloom revolver, the pistol you purchased for self defense, and the little .22 rifle you learned to shoot as a kid.

Consider yourself warned, and vote strategically to protect the Constitution and the right to bear arms against the most dangerous and corrupt candidate to ever be nominated for President.

[PROCON]

I know the author is "preaching to the choir" here but an accurate read about America under President Hillary

**SHUDDER**

[WENDLE]

” president hillary “ is an oxymoron.

[PROCON]

Who keeps the banglist ping list?

[Inyo-Mono]

BTTT!

[Carriage Hill]

I have an old copy of the Gun Talk Ping List; maybe mylife has the Bang List.

[plain talk]

All is takes is for a liberal SC to creatively ‘reinterpret’ the 2nd amendment as currently written. Post-Bill Clinton words can mean whatever liberals want them to mean. My guess is they say you can have a gun if you belong to a militia and then a liberal EO or Congress interprets what a ‘real’ militia is in a way that no ordinary person can belong to one. Once liberals own and control the language they can do what they want and are already doing it.

[PROCON]

Thanks, I rarely get any Pings from the numerous gun articles on FR.

[Disestablishmentarian]

The attacks on the 2nd Amendment are simply to prepare for the day a future Obama (traitor) can invite an invading army of Blue Helmets into our land.

Americans must not be disarmed.

[cp124]

BIOB

[Innovative]

People do need to be aware.

Thanks for posting this.

[Sgt_Schultze]

If that happened, the country would instantly become more violent. We would surely see the invention of a transportable energy weapon. Plans for in-home fabrication would become available as a rebalance of power became necessary.

[Pollster1]

“President” Hillary, God forbid, will do no such thing. My gun rights come directly from God as a natural right, and even a president has no power or authority to restrict those rights.

[Carriage Hill]

You’re on the GT List I have. Last time I posted the Sunday eve thread, subbing for mylife, was 5/17/15.

[wastoute]

And where, pray tell, do they propose to find the humans who will enforce these laws?

[wastoute]

I doubt there is a brain on this planet that would step foot in the US under a blue helmet. Again, where do they think they can find people who they can pay enough to finally give millions of pissed of Americans someone to shoot?

[i_robot73]

*NOTHING* can be read, in the 2nd, let alone the whole of the Constitution, to grant govt authority to trample upon this, or any, Right(s).

But, this *one* word, that they CANNOT change the meaning, is key: INFRINGE.

“Restriction upon....” = infringement
“Wide range of bans...” = infringement
“ability to own, trade, and shoot” = infringement

Course, I too am preaching to the choir. But, when the Party is ALSO your 2nd-worst enemy...Maybe it’s time to do a little watering of old.

[PROCON]

And where, pray tell, do they propose to find the humans who will enforce these laws?

Liberals aren't bright enough to think that far ahead.

Perhaps 0bama's "civilian police force" he spoke about in 2009 AKA black lives matter thugs?

They have NO IDEA what they would wrought.

[elcid1970]

Hillary can send out the flying monkeys. When she does, every police uniform wearer will be seen as a deadly enemy.

The Katrina confiscations and Boston police pointing M-16’s at residents have left a bitter aftertaste that is not forgotten.

Are there enough Govags nationwide to put down the entire populace? Will every shot fired provoke an Apache gunship response? This isn’t the Soviet Union.

[sergeantdave]

Another useless bullsh*t article from Bob Owens. Does Owens really think that Hillary can ignore the law and there won’t be any pushback? Hell. This is stupid clickbait for surrender monkeys.

[PROCON]

Oh, KMA Dave!

Surrender monkeys, indeed.

Yeah, we're all going to roll over for Hillary.