[i_robot73]

*NOTHING* can be read, in the 2nd, let alone the whole of the Constitution, to grant govt authority to trample upon this, or any, Right(s).

But, this *one* word, that they CANNOT change the meaning, is key: INFRINGE.

“Restriction upon....” = infringement
“Wide range of bans...” = infringement
“ability to own, trade, and shoot” = infringement

Course, I too am preaching to the choir. But, when the Party is ALSO your 2nd-worst enemy...Maybe it’s time to do a little watering of old.

[plain talk]

*NOTHING* can be read, in the 2nd, let alone the whole of the Constitution, to grant govt authority to trample upon this, or any, Right(s).

Says who? You? You don't count. :-) In this era we live in now ... liberals can screw around with the meaning of words and appear to get away with it. The 2nd amendment wording will not be a problem for them with the right screwballs in the SC. We are 1-2 SC justice away from that happening.