Posted on 07/15/2016 8:22:21 PM PDT by GraceG
The NRA released a new ad this week, warning rapists and abusers that they will be shot dead by their female victims.
The ad features Dana Loesch, a gun advocate, talking to the camera. She says,
Dana: Heres a message to every rapist, domestic abuser, violent criminal, thug and every other monster who preys upon women.
At this point, you think the message would be, Stop preying upon women. But thats not what Loesch says.
Instead, she encourages the attackers to go on preying upon women. She goes on to say,
Dana: Your life expectancy just got shorter, cause theres a very good chance your next target will be armed, trained and ready to exercise her right to choose her life over yours.
This ad directly addresses rapists and abusers. There are a lot of things you can say when you directly address rapists and abusers, such as Dont be a rapist and/or abuser.
But this ad basically challenges rapists and abusers to keep being rapists and abusers, just to see how gun-empowered women can fight back.
(Excerpt) Read more at elitedaily.com ...
Everyone likes a story with a happy ending - why doesn't Alexandra?
This “writer” does not even know the proper way to format dialogue.
I suspect she will not have to die at the hands of stranger, as she will most likely die of stupidity first.
Which do you think is more likely to discourage the rapist/abuser: blowing his head off or telling him to stop being a rapist/abuser?
By the way, in criticizing the NRA for encouraging women to defend themselves, this author is effectively encouraging the rapists/abusers. But then I guess to a liberal, the criminal's rights are always more important than his victims'.
No, it's more a notice to potential rapists. Call it a threat. Call it a warning. It is most certainly NOT encouragement to continue to prey upon women.
There are a lot of things you can say when you directly address rapists and abusers, such as Dont be a rapist and/or abuser.
Well, if you ever get raped or worse, be sure to tell the assailant Dont be a rapist and/or abuser, and find out pretty quickly if your defense of personal safety theory works or not.
You have a right to your opinion. Live with the consequences. And if "not living" is one of the consequences, make sure they carve your opinion onto your gravestone.
I can see your logical leap but there is a double standard type thing going on.
If your lawyer can’t get you off on justified self defense then saying you were influenced by the media is sure to sway even a liberal jury.
I love the sound of the sheeple waking up and giving a lefty loon a good azzwhoopin'!
Do you have a copy of the advertisement such that it may be evaluated on its own merit or lack thereof, if you believe its message is thus actually aimed?
You may be the one sporting the head point after all.
Believe it or not, some people DO want to try to get everyone to live in peace.
10,000 people panning something means nothing if they never actually see the point, and that goes equally for “conservatives” as for “liberals.”
Most tellingly, we’ve lost a sense of the presence of God. If a person is so distanced from the sense of the presence of God that he is scoffing at a fiery fate, then even the prospect of dying in his quest will not end up being much, if any, of a deterrent. It becomes almost an empty taunt. There is a fine line, but to encourage the desperate to become more desperate is something that lefties know about, even if they are also guilty of the same thing too.
We shouldn’t need legalisms holding our hands in order to do the right thing.
Corrupt liberal elites also want to take guns from law biding citizens WHILE opening the prison doors and releasing thousands of killers and rapists ‘early’..
It's almost like THEY'RE criminals too...
Maybe democrats aren't defending criminals because they're ‘kind and compassionate’ but because they're criminals under the skin too...
No, yours was a pretty stupid post. Almost on par with the writer of this dreck.
“At this point, you’d think their message would be ‘don’t prey upon women.’ “
Strong words. Gives me an idea for a winning hashtag to stop rape.
Question: Would it have prevented clinton from raping Juanita Broaddrick?
And then they'll have their friends come and flatten your house!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.