Posted on 05/19/2016 8:27:37 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell
Only Islam Can Save Us From Islam If we didnt have Muslim immigration, we wouldnt need Muslims to help us fight Muslim terrorism. May 18, 2016 Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
In the Washington Post, Petraeus complained about the inflammatory political discourse that has become far too common both at home and abroad against Muslims and Islam. The former general warned that restricting Muslim immigration would undermine our ability to defeat Islamist extremists by alienating and undermining the allies whose help we most need to win this fight: namely, Muslims.
At Rutgers, Obama claimed that restricting Muslim immigration would alienate the very communities at home and abroad who are our most important partners in the fight against violent extremism.
If we alienate Muslims, who is going to help us fight Muslim terrorism?
You can see why Obama doesnt mention Islamic terrorism in any way, shape or form. Once you drop the I word, then the argument is that you need Islam to fight Islam. And Muslims to fight Muslims.
This is bad enough in the Muslim world where we are told that we have to ally with the moderate Muslim governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to fight the Muslim terrorists whom they sponsor.
Petraeus has troublingly close ties to the Saudis. He defended their oil dumping program, praised the role of Islamic law in fighting Islamic terrorism and endorsed their Syria plans. While defending the Saudis as allies, he blamed Israel for Americas problems with the Muslim world. The narrative he was using there was the traditional Saudi one in which Israel, not Islam, is the source of the friction.
He defended Pakistan as an ally and claimed to believe the Pakistani excuses that they did not know Osama bin Laden was living right in their military center and that they really wanted to fight the Taliban.
Obamas partners against violent extremism have included Muslim Brotherhood terror supporters at home and abroad. He backed Al Qaedas LIFG in Libya, Irans Shiite terror militias in Iraq, Al Qaeda allies in Syria and those are just a few of the worst examples of his partners against extremism.
Petraeus and Obama view terrorists and state sponsors of terror as important allies. Their policies have led to multiple terrorist attacks against Americans. And they still insist that we need Islamic terrorists as allies to protect us from Islamic terrorists. We need moderate theocrats to protect us from extremist theocrats. We need the Saudis and Pakistanis to save us from the terrorists whom they arm and fund.
But its Muslim immigration where their argument really shines.
The United States faces a terror threat because a certain percentage of the Muslim population will kill Americans. Every increase in the Muslim population also increases the number of potential terrorists. Muslim immigration increases the terrorism risk to Americans every single year.
These are undeniable facts.
When youre in a hole, stop digging. Muslim populations are a hole. Immigration is the shovel. Dig deep enough and youre six feet under.
Even if the mainstream narrative about a moderate majority and extremist minority were true, how could the cost of Islamic terrorism justify the expansion of even moderate Muslim communities?
9/11 cost us $3.3 trillion, over 10,000 dead, a national loss of privacy and traumas inflicted on millions. What could any number of moderate Muslims possibly contribute to outweigh all that? If it were a debt, it would take a thousand years to even begin balancing out those scales. And instead of trying to make amends, Muslim groups like CAIR and ISNA have waged a relentless campaign to undermine national security and defame Americans. They have refused to cooperate with law enforcement, defended terrorists and denounced America. These are our moderate partners.
But the Obama/Petraeus narrative about needing partners in Muslim communities in America implicitly concedes that Muslim communities at home, like the Saudis and Pakistanis abroad, create environments in which Islamic terrorists can safely operate. They admit the existence of Islamic no-go zones where the FBI and local law enforcement are ineffective so that we have to treat parts of Michigan or New Jersey like Pakistan or Iraq, trying to work with untrustworthy allies to gain intelligence on enemy territory.
We have to work with CAIR or ISNA, the way we do with the Saudis or Pakistanis, even though theyre untrustworthy, because theyre all we have in parts of America that have become enemy territory.
This argument is terrible enough in the Middle East. But its horrifying in the Midwest.
Its bad enough that we sign off on partners who finance terrorists and then pretend to fight them in Syria or Afghanistan, do we really want to be doing this in Illinois or California?
The real problem, as Obama and Petraeus indirectly concede, is that Muslim communities create an ideal environment for Muslim terrorists. The last thing that we should be doing is building them up.
Even if Muslim communities were an asset, the Obama/Petraeus narrative is that they benefit us by helping us deal with the problems that they cause. The obvious question would be to wonder why we need them in the first place to help us cope with a problem that wouldnt exist without them.
Obama insists that we need Muslim immigration so that Muslims will help us fight Muslim terror. But if we didnt have Muslim immigration, we wouldnt need Muslims to help us fight Muslim terrorism.
Muslim immigration isnt a solution. Its a problem posing as a solution. And we are told that we need to make the problem bigger in order to solve it. Muslim immigration has yet to reduce terrorism in any country. The increase in Muslim populations has not made Europe any safer. On the contrary, it has increased the risk of terrorism. The same is also true in Africa, Asia and across the Middle East.
The plan to reduce the risk of terrorism by increasing the Muslim population has failed around the world. Nor has it ever worked in the United States. What are the odds that it suddenly will now?
Building a counterterrorism strategy around creating more terrorism is not a strategy, its a suicide mission. Using Muslim immigration to fix a terrorism problem caused by Muslim immigration is like drilling a hole in a boat and then trying to plug it with water. Europe is sinking and if we dont stop importing hundreds of thousands of Muslims, well be facing the same problems that Europe does.
It is precisely because the danger of Islamist extremism is so great that politicians here and abroad who toy with anti-Muslim bigotry must consider the effects of their rhetoric, Petraeus insists. Its a compelling argument, but not in the way that he thinks it is.
If Muslims cant handle the full spectrum of argument, debate and namecalling that is a part of life in a free country without turning homicidal, then something has to go. According to Petraeus, its freedom of speech. According to others, its Muslim migration. Americans will have to decide whether they would rather have freedom of speech or Muslim immigration. Because even the advocates for Muslim migration are increasingly willing to admit that we cant have both. The choice is ours.
Either we can hope that Islam will save us from Islam. And that Muslims will protect us from other Muslims. Or we can try to protect ourselves and save our lives and our freedoms from Islam.
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought. Lou
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
Petrayus has a new job, and it’s a 100% screw America, line his pockets with Muslim money kind of job.
Breaking News: Money can cause blindness.
Bad theory.
We didn’t need tens of thousands of NAZIs living among us to help us win WWII.
Bad theory.
We didnt need tens of thousands of NAZIs living among us to help us win WWII.
Surrender to Islamic extortion is official Obama policy.
We did not alienate them. They have hated us since they began to exist. There is nothing that we can do, or should do, to get them on our side. They will never be on our side. The only solution is for all of them to be in their hellholes, and none of them to be in our country.
Bullets and bombs. They’ll save us from savages.
That's not true. Hasn't he ever heard of a religious war?
It is time to put an end to the charade of moderate Islam. There is no such thing as moderate Muslim. Muslims are either jihadists or dormant jihadists moderate, they are not.
Ali Sini
ex-Muslim
Founder of Faithfreedom
http://www.faithfreedom.org/
Only Christianity can save us from Islam.
There is something to be said for that POV.
There was a time when the KKK essentially was above the law was because so many decent white folk were willing to look the other way. Some did it because they secretly agreed with what the Klan was doing, and some did it because they feared retaliation if they ratted on them.
Islam today is the same way. They’re not all radicals but too many of the ones who aren’t are willing to look the other way, either because they secretly agree with their tactics/objectives, or because they fear being singled out as an apostate.
The reason why they refuse to speak out doesn’t really matter, because enabling is enabling, and it prevents us identifying the bad actors so they can be surgically excised. But by failing to turn the radicals out, the “moderates” turn themselves into justifiable targets because that leaves us no logical recourse but to play Wak-a-Muslim and kill every one that pops up until they stop popping up.
Radical Muslims want to kill all non-Muslims. Moderate Muslims want radical Muslims to kill all non-Muslims.
The fact that Muslim terrorists are not shy about proclaiming their willingness to die makes our mission simple: just kill every mother’s son among them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.