Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit against Genetically Engineered Salmon
Cal Sportsman ^ | 4/1/2016 | C Cocoles

Posted on 04/01/2016 6:41:39 AM PDT by w1n1

The Golden Gate Salmon Association is among several litigants in a lawsuit challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s plans to develop genetically engineered salmon.

Here's some info on the lawsuit:

A broad coalition of environmental, consumer, and commercial and recreational fishing organizations today sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approving the first-ever genetically engineered (GE) food animal, an Atlantic salmon engineered to grow quickly. The man-made salmon was created by AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. with DNA from three fish: Atlantic salmon, Pacific king salmon, and Arctic ocean eelpout. This marks the first time any government in the world has approved a GE animal for commercial sale and consumption.

In approving the GE salmon, FDA determined it would not require labeling of the GE fish to let consumers know what they are buying, which led Congress to call for labeling in the 2016 omnibus spending bill. FDA’s approval also ignored comments from nearly 2 million people opposed to the approval because the agency failed to analyze and prevent the risks to wild salmon and the environment, as well as fishing communities, including the risk that GE salmon could escape and threaten endangered wild salmon stocks. Read the rest of the story here.


TOPICS: Education; Miscellaneous; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: fishing; helixmakemineadouble; salmon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2016 6:41:39 AM PDT by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Why would anyone sue genetically engineered salmon?


2 posted on 04/01/2016 6:44:57 AM PDT by Gamecock ( Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul...Matthew 10:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I’m definitely not against genetically engineered anything (non-human), UNLESS it threatens the integrity of crops of other people, and as long as it is clearly indicated as such.


3 posted on 04/01/2016 6:50:20 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Frankenfish !!


4 posted on 04/01/2016 7:00:09 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Slavery will continue to exist and thrive as long a Islam continues to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

No, stopping starvation fish


5 posted on 04/01/2016 7:06:37 AM PDT by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

We’ve been genetically engineering foods for millennia. What do these people think selective breeding is?


6 posted on 04/01/2016 7:18:17 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
What you are describing is not the same thing as this, and to suggest that it is is intellectually dishonest or you are intentionally trying to mislead.
7 posted on 04/01/2016 7:22:17 AM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I want to know where they would escape to? Are they going over the pond wall or through the drainage system? “The ocean is only 30 miles away, let’s rob a bicycle since that is a trait we were taught.”

“My god Hopkins, fish can really ride bikes.”


8 posted on 04/01/2016 7:24:11 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (United we stand, divided we fall. I think the establishment has divided us enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

9 posted on 04/01/2016 7:27:56 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2014/09/genetically_modified_wheat_fou.html


10 posted on 04/01/2016 7:28:00 AM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl

manipulating genes is the same whether you breed for the trait or shortcut the process by inserting it. The point is one process isn’t necessarily more “dangerous” to life than the other.


11 posted on 04/01/2016 7:30:03 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
As if those salmon have a dime to their names.

12 posted on 04/01/2016 7:38:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

As you say, but inserting genes from one animal into another that would never naturally have them is what is happening in this case. If they had a breeding program that achieved the same results I would be okay with that.


13 posted on 04/01/2016 7:40:00 AM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

To my way of thinking, (sans lab evidence), the DNA of the food we eat is extremely important to our diet and well being. There is no way to determine what effect genetically altered food of any sort will have on our internal systems....same with micro-waved foods.


14 posted on 04/01/2016 7:42:33 AM PDT by Banjoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
It isn't a question about whether you can, it's about whether you should.

Selective breeding, humans using God's tech to manipulate God's creations, has produced both good and bad results. We do the best we can.

Otoh, to me, genetic manipulation in the lab, humans using human tech to manipulate God's creations, cuts away the safety net.

We think we know more than we do. We think we can, but we tend to forget our mistakes and often don't remember why we shouldn't.

For example:

“You know what's wrong with scientific power?" Malcolm said.
“It’s a form of inherited wealth. And you know what assholes congenitally rich people are. It never fails."

Hammond said, "What is he talking about?”
Harding made a sign, indicating delirium. Malcolm cocked his eye.

“I will tell you what I am talking about," he said.
"Most kinds of power require a substantial sacrifice by whoever wants the power.
There is an apprenticeship, a discipline lasting many years.
Whatever kind of power you want. President of the company. Black belt in karate. Spiritual guru.
Whatever it is you seek, you have to put in the time, the practice, the effort.
You must give up a lot to get it. It has to be very important to you.
And once you have attained it, it’s your power. It can't be given away: it resides in you.
It is literally the result of your discipline.

Now what is interesting about this process is that,
by the time someone has acquired the ability to kill with his bare hands,
he has also matured to the point where he won't use it unwisely.
So that kind of power has a built-in control.
The discipline of getting the you so that you won't abuse it.

But scientific power is like inherited wealth: attained without discipline.

You read what others have done, and you take the next step.
You can do it very young. You can make progress very fast.
There is no discipline lasting many decades.
There is no mastery: old scientists are ignored.
There is no humility before nature.
There is only a get-rich-quick, make-a-name-for-yourself-fast philosophy.
Cheat, lie, falsify--it doesn't matter. Not to you, or to your colleagues.
No one will criticize you. No one has any standards.
They all trying to do the same thing: to do something big, and do it fast.”

“And because you can stand on the shoulders of giants, you can accomplish something quickly.
You don't even-know exactly what you have done, but already you have reported it; patented it, and sold it.”

“And the buyer will have even less discipline than you. The buyer simply purchases the power, like any commodity.
The buyer doesn’t even conceive that any discipline might be necessary.”

Hammond said, "Do you know what he is talking about?"
Ellie nodded.
“I haven't a clue”; Hammond said.

“I’ll make it simple.” Malcolm said.
"A karate master does not kill people with his bare hands. He does not lose his temper and kill his wife.
The person who kills is the person who has no discipline no restraint,
and who has purchased his power in the form of a Saturday night special.”

“And that is the kind of power that science fosters, and permits.
And that is why you think that to build a place like this is simple."

"It was simple," Hammond insisted.

'Then why did it go wrong?"

--from Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton. New York: Ballantine Books, 1990, pp.305-307.

For our sake and that of a happy future, I hope that safety net is still in place.
15 posted on 04/01/2016 7:47:16 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roos_Girl
Because the actual number of total genetic combinations is a finite number, any combination you create in a lab, is possible in nature. Incredibly unlikely perhaps, but none the less possible. So you can't actually say that it would never occur.

Yeah, I know, I'm quibbling over the mathematics of infinity.

16 posted on 04/01/2016 8:09:02 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

"But I Still Have Many Clones On The Way, To Confuse the Assasins."

Sir Salman Rushdie -- Photo: REUTERS

17 posted on 04/01/2016 8:31:33 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I won’t be happy till they engineer the liberal gene out of humans.


18 posted on 04/01/2016 8:31:40 AM PDT by oldasrocks (They should lock all of you up and only let out us properly medicated people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks
I won’t be happy till they engineer the liberal gene out of humans.

LOL, Now that is a worthy goal!

19 posted on 04/01/2016 8:34:10 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

But why sue the salmon and not the FDA or the company?
(My point here was the sloppy headline)


20 posted on 04/01/2016 8:35:11 AM PDT by Gamecock ( Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul...Matthew 10:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson