Posted on 05/14/2015 7:09:07 AM PDT by HomerBohn
Is there anything about the POS that isn’t fake? (See “Obama’s entire life is a lie“)
Fake birth certificate. Fake military draft (Selective Service) registration. A fake female as wife.
Add fake family photos to the list.
1. Pic of Obama and his grandparents
You’ve probably all seen that picture of Obama seated between his maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, supposedly taken in Central Park sometime in the early 1980s while the Dunhams were visiting Obama when he was a student at Columbia University.
The photo was among other family photos of Obama which were released by his presidential campaign in February 2008 (see Daily Mail). The photo is also in New Yorker editor David Remnick’s 2010 biography of Barack Obama, The Bridge.
Look at the picture again, carefully.
Do you see what’s weird in the picture?
Here’s a hint (see yellow circles): https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/obamawithgrandparents1.jpg?w=1000&h=694"width=600>
Do you see how grandpa Stanley’s upper left arm is vertical, but his left hand is resting on Obama’s left shoulder?
Why don’t you try doing that to another person who’s about the same height as you — put your left hand on his or her left shoulder. Go ahead, try it!
What happened to your left upper arm? Did it stay vertical as Stanley’s arm did, or was it horizontal, stretched across your companion’s back?
It is anatomically impossible for Stanley Dunham to rest his left hand on Obama’s left shoulder while his (Stanley’s) left upper arm stays vertical. That means the picture had been altered by inserting the image of Obama between Stanley and Madelyn.
Here’s the original picture of only the Dunhams (below). Notice the following:
◾The fingers of Stanley’s left hand grasping his wife’s left elbow, which explains why his left upper arm is vertical.
◾The dark shadow between the Dunhams. That’s the phantom right knee of phantom Obama.
◾The wall behind Stanley’s right shoulder is black, without the two horizontal streaks (– –) in the photochopped pic of Obama and the Dunhams.
Hilariously, Alex Pareene (and the commenters) of the left-wing Salon.com derided “birthers” for asserting that the pic of Obama with the Dunhams had been photochopped. Instead, Pareene says it’s the pic of just Stanley and Madelyn that was photochopped. LOL
Hey, Alex Pareen! Do explain how grandpa Dunham can keep his left upper arm vertical while resting his left hand on Obama’s left shoulder!
In the video below, the narrator explains how the picture had been photochopped:
(Watch video at link)
2. Young Barry with dad Obama Sr. in Honolulu Airport
Here’s another at-once heartwarming and heartbreaking photo of 10-year-old Obama with his biological father Barack Hussein Obama Sr., supposedly taken in Honolulu International Airport when Sr. visited Hawaii during the 1971 Christmas holiday season. (Sr. had abandoned Jr. at birth.)
Notice the tips of Obama Sr.’s left hand, especially the finger nails.
Here’s a picture of Obama Jr.’s biological and briefly-married parents, Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham, in the same airport, presumably taken at the same time as the previous picture of Sr. with Jr.
Notice the tips of Obama Sr.’s left hand on Dunham’s left shoulder, especially the finger nails.
Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the finger nails of Obama Sr.’s left hand. The nails in the first pic (left) look completely different from the nails in the second pic (right) — white (instead of light brown) and misshapen.
Alan Jones of 1776 Channel writes:
An apparent mismatch between fingernail sets on Barack Obama Sr.’s left hand, captured in two ‘photographs’ purportedly snapped inside a Honolulu International Airport terminal, reveals that at least one of the images is likely a digital creation [….]
The image featuring Barack Obama Jr. appears to have been distributed by Reuters while the image featuring Dunham appears to have been distributed by the Associated Press, with the names of those wire services appearing in the bottom left corners of identical images served by Google and Bing search engines.
[…] the airport family gathering portrayed in these images of Barack Obama Sr.’s Honolulu arrival or departure likely never happened. Both airport images appear to have been manufactured, perhaps to propel the official narrative of Barack Obama’s family history as told in his memoir “Dreams from My Father.”
Barack Obama Sr. is wearing the same suit and tie in both images, yet has completely different looking left ‘hands’. […]
Additional anomalies detected within the airport terminal images suggest that both images were likely assembled using a raster graphics editor computer application such as Adobe Photoshop.
The faces of all three individuals seen in the foreground of the images, Obama Sr., Obama Jr., and Stanley Ann Dunham, appear to have been photographed under different lighting conditions, suggesting that the images may be composites.
Artifacts and distortions observed along the edges of Barack Obama Sr. suggest masking problems during the creation of composite images. These include the ‘halo’ effect and distortions in the blending and ‘feathering’ of the human subject with the background.
There are also proportional problems, such as the similarity in size of the heads of Barack Obama Sr. and Jr. and the small, distant appearance of the airline agent(s) behind the counter.
The positions of Barack Obama Sr.’s left ‘arms’ appear unnatural in both images. His arm is wrapped around Obama Jr. in one image and around Dunham in the other image.
Obama Sr.’s right arm appears unnaturally narrow in the photograph with Dunham.
The airline agents behind the counter appear to possibly be the same person, but the different looking watches worn on each agent reveal that they are perhaps two different individuals.
Moreover, the appearance of the airport terminal and especially the overhead “San Francisco” sign behind Obama Sr. in the first pic, suggest to 1776 Channel that the airport in the photos might not even be Honolulu International Airport.
3. Obama’s 1973 airport photo with mom
Joel Gilbert, who made the documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” commissioned a professional graphic artist to examine a 1973 family photo posted on Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign page on Facebook.
The photo shows boy Obama standing in Honolulu airport with his mother Stanley Ann Dunham on his right, and on his left, a young girl (most likely his half-sister Maya Soetoro) and his maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham, wearing dark sunglasses.
Notice anything odd about the pic, specifically Ann Dunham’s right hand?
The professional graphic artist who examined the 1973 photo believes the image of Ann Dunham had been airbrushed into the scene to cover up an African-American man who was standing next to Obama, because Ann Dunham’s right hand appears to be a black man’s hand — as you can see in this screenshot I took from Gilbert’s video.
Gilbert believes the airbrushed man was Frank Marshall Davis, a registered member of the American Communist Party and Obama’s childhood mentor. (Go to “Why does Obama’s mom have a black man’s hand in this photo?” for more.)
4. Michelle Obama’s Prom Photo
In April 2012, TV talk show host Ellen Degeneres released a photo of 18-year-old Michelle Robinson posing with her prom date, David Upchurch. As recounted by David A. Graham for The Atlantic, April 15, 2012: “DeGeneres showed the photo [of young Michelle Robinson dressed for prom] as they taped a segment for Monday’s show.”
But FOTM’s very observant reader MomOfIV points out:
A few things to note from my observation, with photo enlarged 300%:
1. the female in the picture is wearing a ring on her wedding finger
2. the female in the picture has an “innie” outer ear fold (you can tell by the shadow on the inside of the outer ear fold), while mooch has an extended outer earfold
3. the female in the picture has an apparently smaller foot (maybe an 8?), while mooch’s feet are a size 11 fromhttp://www.bodymeasurements.org/michelle-obama/ 4. and last, but not least, if you look around the bottom of mooch’s mouth, and the sides of the eyes, and above the eyebrows you will see cut and paste lines….photochop job
So I went looking for pics of Michelle Obama’s left ear. Below is a pic of the left ear of prom Michelle (first left), placed next to three pictures of First Lady Mooch.
As you can see in the comparison pics above (click to enlarge!), the left ears of prom Michelle and First Lady Mooch look very different:
◾prom Michelle has a dainty ear lobe; Mooch has a long ear lobe.
◾Mooch’s ear has a wide expanse of Crura of antihelix that’s missing from the ear of prom girl.
Ears don’t change. The young woman in the prom photo is not Michelle Robinson. Whoever photochopped Michelle’s face onto the prom pic not only overlooked the wedding ring on the girl’s left hand, the fraudster also didn’t bother to fix the ears. LOL
Look at grandpa left hand and his right hand, the first finger of both hands are of the same person, that's all I am saying. I don't know where they got the photo of the floating hand but it does look like grandpas hand.
.
As to the birther designation, I'm sure sighing non-birthers can happily produce a Columbia College yearbook with Obama's photo (there must be hundreds among the grads) or explain how it is that a self-described mediocre student gained admittance to Harvard Law. How about $500 to your favorite charity for a photo of Stanley Ann Dunham pregnant with the future President?
“Why sigh? If the E.O. is used as cover to totally keep any records from being released by any relevant party, then just the threat of potentially violating an E.O. works. “
Except, the E.O. in question has nothing to do with the types of records you’re talking about.
“The word should be photoshopped.”
Actually I’ve seen “Photochopped” used to describe a bad Photoshop job.
What is this “photochopped” that is continually referenced?
Like a bootleg version of Photoshop or something?
Actually I’ve seen “Photochopped” used to describe a bad Photoshop job.
It seems that the present recumbent of the WH ... Yes! Our POTUS! may be some sort of impostor. However, I have it on super secret inside info that he may be for real, but that his double may be an impostor. I also have it on good authority that the Obama Family Version of Photoshop Lite was recalled a long time ago.
As far as the "family" pictures go, I am just grateful that they have any at all. It's sort of like those instant families in the ready-made picture frames, which as a kid I thought were for people who had no relatives.
Nah, it’s more an indicator of ignorance.
Let’s all expect someone who cannot spell a thing to be an expert on it.
Yeah.
Zoom in onto her elbow. The row of bumps around her elbow aren’t grey like the wall but are pink. Those 4 pink bumps are grandpa’s finger tips.
The snarly look is definitely her.
Anyway...I tried to give the person who took it the benefit of the doubt...that it was a pic of lightning in which the camera was shaking and it made a swirling pattern.
I'll try to find it and will send you the FB link in a PM.
All of their *family* pictures look fake (except for the scowl on her face. THAT’S real.). Every time I see a picture of him he looks like a cardboard cutout of himself.
P.S. Next time I have the hiccups I’m going to look at the pics you posted.
That's the widest shot I could find of the original image. Note the depression in the wall at Stanley Armour's shoulder. Note the course of the mortar in the wall blocks. His hand supposedly on Madelyn's shoulder has his fingers in exactly the same position as his other hand, but the hand appears to have been reversed. Check the fingers.
Now we have a man sitting close to the place where Madelyn was shown sitting. From this you can compare the course of the wall blocks/mortar, which doesn't appear to match the previous image. The bump is still in the wall at the top, and it's the same tree, the tree seems to be a little further to the right, but it's grown in the time between the photographs.
Phil removed zero (and the tree)and that shows how the Dunhams were probably shown sitting side by side, but there's the question of where? The Dunhams might well have been placed in that position and the wall blocks needed 'reconstruction' to accommodate the third party. Have I put that badly? Maybe. There was a wall, there was a tree, there was an image of the Dunhams, they were separated, then zero was placed between them. However, if the Dunhams had never been photographed on that bench, then the wall would not have needed 'reconstruction' - would it?
The location from another angle. How does this need fit into the narrative? Are we being shown a relationship between zero and the Dunhams which no longer existed?
Apologies to those who abhor my penchant for images. There's really to other way.
Same day in Central Park, same clothes. One of several poses on that bridge would have provided an image that fitted nicely between the Dunhams. Note the strong sunlight on his left hand in the three-party image.
Those aren’t good enough to be modern Photoshops. This is KGB stuff from the 80’s. Tantalizingly close to concrete proof that Obama is a mole.
Now I know these people are sloppy, at best. We proved this was not another airport.
Here is an archive photo of the Honolulu Airport in the 1960's, at the Pan Am ticket lobby. Look familiar? Same lighted wall sign? Same bent counter pole? The San Francisco sign this author references is the counter sign for San Francisco bound flights. This photo shows the Los Angeles ticket counter.
This picture is from the Hawaiian aviation historical photos from this site .
-PJ
Yes! Exactly. Wild, isn't it?
He probably gets paid to post that kind of crap.
Yeah, and any Republican candidate they’ll go clear back into the womb to find dirt.
All of them in Washington dc are in on it.Jmo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
