Posted on 04/12/2015 2:53:19 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
Well, today's the day. Hillary has announced her run for the Presidency. What are we going to get?
I attest we are going to get eight more years of Obama. Why is that? My opinion is they are two peas in a pod, not a scintilla of difference. Let's look at their records, political platforms and philosophy and see why.
They both worship at the God of Alinsky and are hard core followers of the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Mao.
They both are atheists. Yeah, they put on the religious trappings when it suits them, and yeah, Obama was raised a Muslim and can 'do Muslim' when it's politically expedient, but I think both are atheists at heart.
They both spearheaded and one passed the keystone in the arch of socialism, socialized medicine, aka Obamacare.
They both believe in big centralized bloated bureaucratic government.
They both loathe the military and continually want to downsize our armed forces.
They both are anti-Semitic and side with the Palestinians in 'the struggle.' Israel is another obstacle to their one-world socialist government plans.
They both are for same sex marriage and back every LGBTQ cause and issue.
They both are for abortion, even late term and post birth abortion.
They both play the race card.
They both play the sexism card. With Hillary it will be full bore non-stop.
They both see Islam and Muslim extremism as helping their eventual goals of worldwide socialism, thus the current orchestrated Middle East quagmire. "We came, we saw, he died." Witness the limp response to ISIS, Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups. Dead Christians? No problem. .
They both support extreme citizen monitoring through the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security.
They both are anti-business, free enterprise and free markets. To them, the private sector gets in the way of big government. "You didn't build that."
They both ignore the constitution and believe they are above the law. Tons could be written on this. Nuf' said.
They both feel entitled to control the MSM. In fact there's a lot of data showing the MSM gets their talking points from the White House. The MSM compliantly obliges. Will this change in a Clinton WH? In my opinion it will be worse. Remember the media laughing when Hillary mentioned the server issue at the UN?
They both are in bed with Wall Street.
They both are in bed with the unions, both private sector and public sector.
They both support higher taxes and would tax anything if they could get away with it. Internet taxes on deck.
They both support choking regulations to stifle free enterprise and small business with resultant loss of jobs.
They both support increasing the minimum wage with the resultant loss of jobs. Hmm, are we seeing a pattern here?
They both loathe the constitution which they see as only hampering their goals.
They both hate the Tea Party and anything conservative. Remember the "tea bagger" and "vast right wing conspiracy" rhetoric?
They are both firm believers in centralized government curriculum planning, aka Common Core. More "It takes a Village" on deck.
They both could care less about the middle class or the average American. All the talk about the poor, 'caring', helping the inner city, etc, . . you could go on and on. . is just a vote getting machine. Do you honestly think Obama and Hillary care about anyone and anything other than themselves? Do you think they care at all about flyover country?
They both are for expanding the reach of federal law enforcement to control local police jurisdictions. I wonder why?
They both are vehemently against the 2nd Amendment and are doing all they can, directly and through the back door, to extinguish our gun rights. Remember, the green lights to full on tyranny are socialized medicine and gun control. Then you can start loading the buses for the southwest desert.
They both support crony capitalism and straight out bribes with associated "pay for play."
They both have an extensive history of lying. Can you say "end justifies the means" again?
They both support more illegal immigration, no border fence and a huge influx of people from south of the border. . just for votes. To hell with legal immigration. To hell with all the Americans killed, raped, injured, robbed and abused by criminal illegal aliens. . As long as they vote.
They both support massive welfare expansion and overall entitlements. . more votes again.
They both are firm believers in the Cloward-Piven strategy. See above. Remember, Bill Clinton was the architect of the Motor-Voter law. From the article: "All three of these organizations -- ACORN, Project Vote and Human SERVE -- set to work lobbying energetically for the so-called Motor-Voter law, which Bill Clinton ultimately signed in 1993. The Motor-Voter bill is largely responsible for swamping the voter rolls with "dead wood" - invalid registrations signed in the name of deceased, ineligible or non-existent people - thus opening the door to the unprecedented levels of voter fraud and "voter disenfranchisement" claims that followed in subsequent elections."
They both heavily support election gimmicks, tricks and voter fraud. Remember Obama's state senator and US senator shenanigans? Do you think Hillary's presidential election will be any different? There's that "end justifies the means" again. .
They both have no concern about our 18 Trillion dollar debt and 200 Trillion of unfunded liabilities. In fact, for them, it fits well with the Cloward-Piven strategy.
They both have a history of drug use and are in favor of legalization of drugs.
They both have no understanding of what it takes to start and run a business. They have never done payroll, had to fight with government bureaucrats, fight high taxation and choking regulation. In summary, they have no clue how most of America works and what we have to put up with on a daily basis.
They both promote an ever expanding and lawless EPA that is daily producing more laws and regulations to further stymie the private sector. All without congressional approval or input of course.
They both are rabid proponents of the global warming/climate change scam. Big money for big grants for their cronies. Does Solyndra come to mind?
They both are of the mind set that they are above the law, can ignore congress and the courts and make their own laws. Let's see, how many times has Obama changed Obamacare?
They both are ardent supports of the UN, the eventual pathway to the socialist utopia.
They both are strong supporters of an appeasement foreign policy with subsequent weakening of America on the world stage. Their actions prove they want to cut America down to size to prepare us for the worldwide socialist utopia.
They both squelch any investigative reporting into their pasts. The past scandals with both are numerous. Remember Whitewater, Filegate, Vince Foster and the "Bimbo Eruptions" war room in the basement of the White House? Will investigative reporters rush to write about these issues - again? Nary a peep you'll hear. For those who want to review them, go to The Hillary Clinton Scandals, 10 Scandals Involving Hillary Clinton You May Have Forgotten.
Obama did and Hillary will get puff piece interviews, staged appearances and rigged controlled debates. Yawn.
They both are intolerant of any questioning. Witness Hillary making the decree to the press of the anathema words. What? Do we still have a 1st Amendment? We can't use Polarizing, Calculating, Disingenuous, Insincere, Ambitious, Inevitable, Entitled, Overconfident , Secretive, Will do anything to win, Represents the past, Out of touch? Why is that Hillary? Because they're your essence?
They both are self aggrandizing primary narcissists. I'm talking Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Everything is about them. What do narcissists want? More aptly stated, what do they constantly need? Power and money. What is more power and money oriented than big government? Every wonder why these types gravitate to the Beltway?
Okay, if power and money, are there drugs, then it's on to "the end justifies the means." Sound familiar? The end is to be crowned POTUS in January, 2017. The means are what? Votes! So, rally the LIVs, the hard core left and the various ethnic/racial sub groups and get those damned votes! Cackle. Now I'm up to 45% maybe. Cackle. Now push the sexist woman vote and all the glass ceiling feminist shtick plus add the men are rotten stuff and I'll get 60-70% of the women vote! Now lay the guilt on with the big city wimpy metrosexual men and demand they vote for the first woman president and maybe I can get over 50% of the guy vote! Cackle, cackle. And Voila', I'm President!
It may not be that easy Hillary. Remember Benghazi? Benghazi Panel's Republicans Unfazed by Hillary's 2016 Plans Remember the server? Hillary Just Recused Herself and Hillary's Server Conundrum: Is it going away? Also, fresh today from the New York Post: Here’s a breakdown of every scandal swirling around Hillary
The people of America soundly rejected the progressive/socialist agenda in Nov 2010 and Nov 2014. The clarion call after the 2014 election was, "Stop Obama." Since Congress has ignored our plea, it is doubly important that the people of America set aside their individual differences and focus on the survival of America rather than their little subgroup.
Will the electorate Stop Obama by not voting for Hillary on November 8, 2016?
America - To be, or not to be, that is the question. .
Nope. She will do that bitchy populist, condescending crap in the debate. Low info voters love that crap.
She has to be wounded before that point. Now that she’s announced, her testimony before the house will be a circus.
The LIVs aren't going to change. The bitchy populist routine will turn off the independents and fence sitters. We'll see. .
Both are responsible for the chaos in the middle east — Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, etc.
Both are closely aligned with the muslim brotherhood.
Could be part of the reason she announced this early. She'll gun for the 'poor Hillary' crowd and 'ain't it awful. Bless her heart. .
Good points. Forgot to include the muslim brotherhood ties. Huma et al.
No doubt, but the media will be even worse...
No doubt, but the media will be even worse...
Almost makes you sick thinking how bad it's going to be. Thrill up the leg will be nothing. . . If they overdo it though, could turn into a net negative. We'll see. .
Here’s a longer thread with comments on Rules for Radicals
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308852/posts
Thanks for posting hoosiermama.
I wish FOX or other programs would do an in-depth 2 hour program of R4R
Calling out those using the techniques - naming names and incidents
If you know anyone with contacts pass on or send the contact info to me to pass on.
Attacking people is not nearly as successful as exposing their actions for what they are trying to succeed
Many thanks!
I’ve a copy of the book..... got it at a yard sale for $1 (didn’t wanna pay the full price )
Know your enemy....
> * RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
I think this is exactly why Obama constantly has Jarrett and her crew continuously antagonize the The America People or “the right”. He is trying to force a reaction and wants violence so he can spring his brownshirt surprise army on The People. Just let him get out of office then begin the fun.
I think that would be a great idea. I found several links at you tube, including two by Mark Levin:
Youtube on Rules for Radicals Mark Levin link Part I and Part II
I also remember seeing Beck years ago talking about R4R. Found it here: Glenn Beck on Rules for Radicals
We need to reverse-Alinksy them! Heard via Slyfox: "When Ted Cruz began his campaign (senate campaign or the one he is in right now?) he got copies of the book written by Obama’s guy who master-minded the 2008 election campaign and he had his entire staff read it. Something about all the technicalities that really worked - but not the ideology. Ted is one smart dude. He has figured out the obama-ites the way Ronald Reagan had the commies figured out."
I think you’re right about “hell to pay” Jarrett. Her moves are very calculated for effect.
That doesn’t sound like Alinsky... do you have a link?
She had to announce sometime this week. She rented some space in NYC. When you spend more than $5,000 its starts a clock ticking somewhere in the Federal Election Commission where you have to announce within something like ten days.
Makes me want to throw things at the TV.
To really “come at her” it will cause the media to go nuts. Might be fun to see, but I doubt if anyone will take the gloves off.
I just found the graphic. It is more like of a summation of his ideas.
Good one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.