Eight More Years of Obama?

Well, today's the day. Hillary has announced her run for the Presidency. What are we going to get?

I attest we are going to get eight more years of Obama. Why is that? My opinion is they are two peas in a pod, not a scintilla of difference. Let's look at their records, political platforms and philosophy and see why.

They both worship at the God of Alinsky and are hard core followers of the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Mao.

They both are atheists. Yeah, they put on the religious trappings when it suits them, and yeah, Obama was raised a Muslim and can 'do Muslim' when it's politically expedient, but I think both are atheists at heart.

They both spearheaded and one passed the keystone in the arch of socialism, socialized medicine, aka Obamacare.

They both loathe the military and continually want to downsize our armed forces.

They both are anti-Semitic and side with the Palestinians in 'the struggle.' Israel is another obstacle to their one-world socialist government plans.

They both see Islam and Muslim extremism as helping their eventual goals of worldwide socialism, thus the current orchestrated Middle East quagmire. "We came, we saw, he died." Witness the limp response to ISIS, Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups. Dead Christians? No problem. .

They both support extreme citizen monitoring through the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security.

They both are anti-business, free enterprise and free markets. To them, the private sector gets in the way of big government. "You didn't build that."

They both ignore the constitution and believe they are above the law. Tons could be written on this. Nuf' said.

They both feel entitled to control the MSM. In fact there's a lot of data showing the MSM gets their talking points from the White House. The MSM compliantly obliges. Will this change in a Clinton WH? In my opinion it will be worse. Remember the media laughing when Hillary mentioned the server issue at the UN?

They both support higher taxes and would tax anything if they could get away with it. Internet taxes on deck.

They both support choking regulations to stifle free enterprise and small business with resultant loss of jobs.

They both support increasing the minimum wage with the resultant loss of jobs. Hmm, are we seeing a pattern here?

They both hate the Tea Party and anything conservative. Remember the "tea bagger" and "vast right wing conspiracy" rhetoric?

They are both firm believers in centralized government curriculum planning, aka Common Core. More "It takes a Village" on deck.

They both could care less about the middle class or the average American. All the talk about the poor, 'caring', helping the inner city, etc, . . you could go on and on. . is just a vote getting machine. Do you honestly think Obama and Hillary care about anyone and anything other than themselves? Do you think they care at all about flyover country?

They both are for expanding the reach of federal law enforcement to control local police jurisdictions. I wonder why?

They both are vehemently against the 2nd Amendment and are doing all they can, directly and through the back door, to extinguish our gun rights. Remember, the green lights to full on tyranny are socialized medicine and gun control. Then you can start loading the buses for the southwest desert.

They both support crony capitalism and straight out bribes with associated "pay for play."

They both have an extensive history of lying. Can you say "end justifies the means" again?

They both support more illegal immigration, no border fence and a huge influx of people from south of the border. . just for votes. To hell with legal immigration. To hell with all the Americans killed, raped, injured, robbed and abused by criminal illegal aliens. . As long as they vote.

They both support massive welfare expansion and overall entitlements. . more votes again.

They both are firm believers in the Cloward-Piven strategy. See above. Remember, Bill Clinton was the architect of the Motor-Voter law. From the article: "All three of these organizations -- ACORN, Project Vote and Human SERVE -- set to work lobbying energetically for the so-called Motor-Voter law, which Bill Clinton ultimately signed in 1993. The Motor-Voter bill is largely responsible for swamping the voter rolls with "dead wood" - invalid registrations signed in the name of deceased, ineligible or non-existent people - thus opening the door to the unprecedented levels of voter fraud and "voter disenfranchisement" claims that followed in subsequent elections."

They both heavily support election gimmicks, tricks and voter fraud. Remember Obama's state senator and US senator shenanigans? Do you think Hillary's presidential election will be any different? There's that "end justifies the means" again. .

They both have no concern about our 18 Trillion dollar debt and 200 Trillion of unfunded liabilities. In fact, for them, it fits well with the Cloward-Piven strategy.

They both have no understanding of what it takes to start and run a business. They have never done payroll, had to fight with government bureaucrats, fight high taxation and choking regulation. In summary, they have no clue how most of America works and what we have to put up with on a daily basis.

They both promote an ever expanding and lawless EPA that is daily producing more laws and regulations to further stymie the private sector. All without congressional approval or input of course.

They both are rabid proponents of the global warming/climate change scam. Big money for big grants for their cronies. Does Solyndra come to mind?

They both are of the mind set that they are above the law, can ignore congress and the courts and make their own laws. Let's see, how many times has Obama changed Obamacare?

They both are ardent supports of the UN, the eventual pathway to the socialist utopia.

They both are strong supporters of an appeasement foreign policy with subsequent weakening of America on the world stage. Their actions prove they want to cut America down to size to prepare us for the worldwide socialist utopia.

They both squelch any investigative reporting into their pasts. The past scandals with both are numerous. Remember Whitewater, Filegate, Vince Foster and the "Bimbo Eruptions" war room in the basement of the White House? Will investigative reporters rush to write about these issues - again? Nary a peep you'll hear. For those who want to review them, go to The Hillary Clinton Scandals, 10 Scandals Involving Hillary Clinton You May Have Forgotten.

Obama did and Hillary will get puff piece interviews, staged appearances and rigged controlled debates. Yawn.

They both are intolerant of any questioning. Witness Hillary making the decree to the press of the anathema words. What? Do we still have a 1st Amendment? We can't use Polarizing, Calculating, Disingenuous, Insincere, Ambitious, Inevitable, Entitled, Overconfident , Secretive, Will do anything to win, Represents the past, Out of touch? Why is that Hillary? Because they're your essence?

They both are self aggrandizing primary narcissists. I'm talking Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Everything is about them. What do narcissists want? More aptly stated, what do they constantly need? Power and money. What is more power and money oriented than big government? Every wonder why these types gravitate to the Beltway?

Okay, if power and money, are there drugs, then it's on to "the end justifies the means." Sound familiar? The end is to be crowned POTUS in January, 2017. The means are what? Votes! So, rally the LIVs, the hard core left and the various ethnic/racial sub groups and get those damned votes! Cackle. Now I'm up to 45% maybe. Cackle. Now push the sexist woman vote and all the glass ceiling feminist shtick plus add the men are rotten stuff and I'll get 60-70% of the women vote! Now lay the guilt on with the big city wimpy metrosexual men and demand they vote for the first woman president and maybe I can get over 50% of the guy vote! Cackle, cackle. And Voila', I'm President!

The people of America soundly rejected the progressive/socialist agenda in Nov 2010 and Nov 2014. The clarion call after the 2014 election was, "Stop Obama." Since Congress has ignored our plea, it is doubly important that the people of America set aside their individual differences and focus on the survival of America rather than their little subgroup.

FYI - Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals

Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.