Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SomebodyIs Manipulatingthe Numbers:In The Realm Of Economics A Change Of This Magnitude Is A Collaps
SHTF Plan ^ | 12/9/14 | Mac Slavo

Posted on 12/09/2014 8:05:22 PM PST by Kartographer

We’re not seeing many corporations hire here. They are laying off at this point. This is why we are seeing the retail sales completely falling. We have an unemployment rate of 5.8%, but prior years the unemployment rate was higher but we had better sales.

Somebody is manipulating the numbers… and we know who that ‘somebody’ is… it’s the U.S. government and central bankers.

In the real world, where people regularly eat food, we see inflation… and if we really calculate it out we see inflation is around 10%…when we subtract a realistic estimate of inflation, once we get even close to 10%, suddenly a negative 11% on Black Friday becomes negative 20%.

Black Friday shopping in the U.S. this year plummeted by 20% or more.

In the realm of economics a year-over-year change of this magnitude is not a plunge. It is a collapse.

(Excerpt) Read more at shtfplan.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Anyone believing the numbers coming out of Washington I have some gold bars I like to sell you.
1 posted on 12/09/2014 8:05:22 PM PST by Kartographer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Well.....if things are really as bad as most suspect and feel it is, the gold bars would be good to have.


2 posted on 12/09/2014 8:08:37 PM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

You can melt them down and make some great light bulbs.


3 posted on 12/09/2014 8:09:53 PM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

try eating gold


4 posted on 12/09/2014 8:19:04 PM PST by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Tacos here went from $2.50 each (they're big) to $3.00 each recently. That is a 20% increase. Eggs are sky high. Lawnmower batteries are $40 each, a price I have never seen. The inflation rate is FAR higher than what is being reported.

Now that the cost of fuel has plummeted, the cost of moving goods has also plummeted. When are prices of goods going to adjust? Hmmmmmm???

5 posted on 12/09/2014 8:23:27 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin ( Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Most mid to large corps institute hiring and budget freezes just after Halloween. This is to control costs ahead of the end-of-the year fiscal reports that are due in 1Q of the next year.

They also use this time to cull “dead wood” personnel from the payroll in order to maximize profits for the year.


6 posted on 12/09/2014 8:26:14 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Actually, you’ve hit on the problem - Washington under this Administration! Almost everything that come out these days is strictly Political - all forecasts, job numbers, unemployment, inflation, and almost everything else is suspect. You can’t believe a thing they say - a real shame! I really don’t think that it use to be this bad but today, it is horrible. To say that inflation is only 1.7% is such an obvious lie to normal Americans that it should be prosecuted! Seems that my expenses overall have gone up over 10% is not an exaggeration! Rent up 10%, food up 12%, gasoline (even with the recent drop) up 6%. They must be using items that nobody buys to get to their calculations!

Just how are businesses suppose to react to the news when even they believe it is false? They can look at the actual numbers - receivables and sales and know what is happening..


7 posted on 12/09/2014 8:27:08 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

they have always planned for this because the cpi does not take into account food. so really, the current number is not a lie, but the economist who initially defined the cpi should be tarred and feathered (its so deceitful, I wonder if it was defined by jonathan gruber).


8 posted on 12/09/2014 8:33:33 PM PST by willywill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Check out meat prices and milk prices. When were they so high -— never.


9 posted on 12/09/2014 8:40:07 PM PST by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Of Course. Everything is about deception now.


10 posted on 12/09/2014 8:41:56 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Anyone believing the numbers coming out of Washington I have some gold bars I like to sell you.

To make the analogy even more accurate, make them gold plated tungsten. Which is a pretty much what we are being served.

11 posted on 12/09/2014 8:54:45 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

The idiots that kept voting for this regime along with those that keep believing are to blame. They are losing the most here and yet they still hang onto their elected black messiah and his cronies! What a bunch of dummies! They’ve lost the most and can’t see what is happening before their own eyes!


12 posted on 12/09/2014 9:10:40 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
As for the unemployment rate -- if they ain't participating in the labor force they ain't included in the unemployed rate computation. And the participation rate is expect to continue its downward slide except for a very few.

Civilian labor force participation rates by age, sex, race, and ethnicity

See brief discription here

Table 3. Civilian labor force participation rates by age, sex, race, and ethnicity, 1992, 2002, 2012, and projected 2022 (In percent)

Partici pation rate Percent change Annual growth rate
Group 1992 2002 2012 2022 1992-2002 2002-2012 2012-2022 1992-2002 2002-2012 2012-2022
Total, 16 years
and older
66.4 66.6 63.7 61.6 0.2 -2.9 -2.1 0.0 -0.4 -0.3
16 to 24 66.1 63.3 54.9 49.6 -2.9 -8.4 -5.3 -0.4 -1.4 -1.0
16 to 19 51.3 47.4 34.3 27.3 -3.8 -13.1 -7.0 -0.8 -3.2 -2.3
20 to 24 77.1 76.4 70.9 67.3 -0.7 -5.5 -3.6 -0.1 -0.7 -0.5
25 to 54 83.6 83.3 81.4 81.0 -0.3 -1.9 -0.4 0.0 -0.2 -0.1
25 to 34 83.7 83.7 81.7 81.1 0.0 -2.0 -0.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.1
35 to 44 85.1 84.1 82.6 81.8 -0.9 -1.5 -0.8 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1
45 to 54 81.5 82.1 80.2 79.9 0.6 -1.9 -0.3 0.1 -0.2 0.0
55 and older 29.7 34.5 40.5 41.5 4.9 6.0 1.0 1.5 1.6 0.3
55 to 64 56.2 61.9 64.5 67.5 5.7 2.6 3.0 1.0 0.4 0.5
55 to 59 67.4 70.7 72.5 75.5 3.2 1.8 3.0 0.5 0.3 0.4
60 to 64 45.0 50.5 55.2 59.8 5.5 4.7 4.6 1.2 0.9 0.8
60 to 61 56.0 59.7 63.8 68.4 3.7 4.1 4.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
62 to 64 37.7 43.7 49.1 53.8 5.9 5.4 4.7 1.5 1.2 0.9
65 and older 11.5 13.2 18.5 23.0 1.7 5.3 4.5 1.4 3.4 2.2
65 to 74 16.3 20.4 26.8 31.9 4.1 6.5 5.1 2.3 2.8 1.7
65 to 69 20.6 26.1 32.1 38.3 5.4 6.0 6.2 2.4 2.1 1.8
70 to 74 11.1 14.0 19.5 24.0 2.9 5.5 4.5 2.3 3.4 2.1
75 to 79 6.3 7.4 11.4 14.9 1.1 4.0 3.5 1.7 4.4 2.7
75 and older 4.5 5.1 7.6 10.5 0.6 2.5 2.9 1.3 4.1 3.3
Men, 16 years
and older
75.8 74.1 70.2 67.6 -1.7 -3.9 -2.6 -0.2 -0.5 -0.4
16 to 24 70.5 65.5 56.5 51.1 -5.0 -9.0 -5.4 -0.7 -1.5 -1.0
16 to 19 53.4 47.5 34.0 27.8 -5.9 -13.5 -6.2 -1.2 -3.3 -2.0
20 to 24 83.3 80.7 74.5 69.9 -2.6 -6.2 -4.6 -0.3 -0.8 -0.6
25 to 54 93.0 91.0 88.7 88.2 -1.9 -2.3 -0.5 -0.2 -0.3 -0.1
25 to 34 93.8 92.4 89.5 88.8 -1.3 -2.9 -0.7 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1
35 to 44 93.7 92.1 90.7 90.4 -1.6 -1.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 0.0
45 to 54 90.7 88.5 86.1 85.1 -2.3 -2.4 -1.0 -0.3 -0.3 -0.1
55 and older 38.4 42.0 46.8 46.2 3.6 4.8 -0.6 0.9 1.1 -0.1
55 to 64 67.0 69.2 69.9 71.0 2.2 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.2
55 to 59 79.0 78.0 78.0 77.8 -1.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.0
60 to 64 54.7 57.6 60.5 64.3 2.9 2.9 3.8 0.5 0.5 0.6
60 to 61 67.2 67.3 68.8 69.7 0.1 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.1
62 to 64 46.2 50.4 54.6 60.5 4.2 4.2 5.9 0.9 0.8 1.0
65 and older 16.1 17.9 23.6 27.2 1.8 5.7 3.6 1.1 2.8 1.4
65 to 74 21.1 25.5 31.8 35.9 4.4 6.3 4.1 1.9 2.2 1.2
65 to 69 26.0 32.2 37.1 41.6 6.3 4.9 4.5 2.2 1.4 1.2
70 to 74 15.0 17.6 24.2 28.8 2.6 6.6 4.6 1.6 3.2 1.8
75 to 79 9.0 10.2 15.9 19.0 1.2 5.7 3.1 1.2 4.6 1.8
75 and older 7.3 7.6 11.3 13.9 0.4 3.7 2.6 0.5 4.0 2.1
Women, 16 years
and older
57.8 59.6 57.7 56.0 1.8 -1.9 -1.7 0.3 -0.3 -0.3
16 to 24 61.8 61.1 53.2 48.1 -0.7 -7.9 -5.1 -0.1 -1.4 -1.0
16 to 19 49.1 47.3 34.6 26.7 -1.7 -12.7 -7.9 -0.4 -3.1 -2.6
20 to 24 70.9 72.1 67.4 64.7 1.2 -4.7 -2.7 0.2 -0.7 -0.4
25 to 54 74.6 75.9 74.5 73.8 1.3 -1.4 -0.7 0.2 -0.2 -0.1
25 to 34 73.9 75.1 74.1 73.4 1.2 -1.0 -0.7 0.2 -0.1 -0.1
35 to 44 76.7 76.4 74.8 73.3 -0.3 -1.6 -1.5 0.0 -0.2 -0.2
45 to 54 72.6 76.0 74.7 74.9 3.4 -1.3 0.2 0.5 -0.2 0.0
55 and older 22.8 28.5 35.1 37.5 5.7 6.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 0.7
55 to 64 46.5 55.2 59.4 64.3 8.7 4.2 4.9 1.7 0.7 0.8
55 to 59 56.8 63.8 67.3 73.3 7.0 3.5 6.0 1.2 0.5 0.9
60 to 64 36.4 44.1 50.4 55.6 7.7 6.3 5.2 1.9 1.4 1.0
60 to 61 45.7 52.8 59.2 67.2 7.1 6.4 8.0 1.5 1.1 1.3
62 to 64 30.5 37.6 44.1 47.7 7.2 6.5 3.6 2.1 1.6 0.8
65 and older 8.3 9.8 14.4 19.5 1.6 4.6 5.1 1.7 3.9 3.1
65 to 74 12.5 16.1 22.5 28.3 3.7 6.4 5.8 2.6 3.4 2.3
65 to 69 16.2 20.7 27.6 35.4 4.5 6.9 7.8 2.5 2.9 2.5
70 to 74 8.2 11.1 15.4 19.8 3.0 4.3 4.4 3.2 3.3 2.5
75 to 79 4.4 5.4 7.9 11.6 1.0 2.5 3.7 2.1 3.9 3.9
75 and older 2.8 3.5 5.0 8.0 0.7 1.5 3.0 2.3 3.7 4.8

Race:

White 66.8 66.8 64.0 61.7 0.0 -2.8 -2.3 0.0 -0.4 -0.4
Men 76.5 74.8 71.0 68.3 -1.7 -3.8 -2.7 -0.2 -0.5 -0.4
Women 57.7 59.3 57.4 55.3 1.6 -1.9 -2.1 0.3 -0.3 -0.4
Black 63.9 64.8 61.5 59.8 0.9 -3.3 -1.7 0.1 -0.5 -0.3
Men 70.7 68.4 63.6 61.7 -2.3 -4.8 -1.9 -0.3 -0.7 -0.3
Women 58.5 61.8 59.8 58.3 3.3 -2.0 -1.5 0.6 -0.3 -0.3
Asian 66.5 67.2 63.9 63.2 0.7 -3.3 -0.7 0.1 -0.5 -0.1
Men 75.2 75.9 72.2 71.4 0.7 -3.7 -0.8 0.1 -0.5 -0.1
Women 58.2 59.1 56.5 56.1 0.9 -2.6 -0.4 0.2 -0.4 -0.1

All other
groups1

- - 63.9 63.2 - - -0.7 - - -
Men - - 69.4 63.8 - - -5.6 - - -
Women - - 58.8 62.6 - - 3.8 - - -

Ethnicity:

Hispanic origin 66.8 69.1 66.4 65.9 2.3 -2.7 -0.5 0.3 -0.4 -0.1
Men 80.7 80.3 76.1 74.8 -0.4 -4.2 -1.3 0.0 -0.5 -0.2
Women 52.8 57.6 56.6 56.8 4.8 -1.0 0.2 0.9 -0.2 0.0
Other than Hispanic
origin
66.4 66.2 63.2 60.7 -0.2 -3.0 -2.5 0.0 -0.5 -0.4
Men 75.3 73.2 69.1 65.9 -2.1 -4.2 -3.2 -0.3 -0.6 -0.5
Women 58.3 59.9 57.9 55.9 1.6 -2.0 -2.0 0.3 -0.3 -0.4
White non-Hispanic 66.7 66.5 63.5 60.8 -0.2 -3.0 -2.7 0.0 -0.5 -0.4
Men 76.0 73.8 69.9 67.0 -2.2 -3.9 -2.9 -0.3 -0.5 -0.4
Women 58.1 59.6 57.6 54.9 1.5 -2.0 -2.7 0.3 -0.3 -0.5

Footnotes:
1 The “all other groups" category includes (1) those classified as being of multiple racial origin and (2) the race categories of (2a) American Indian and Alaska Native or (2b) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders.

Note: Dash indicates no data collected for category. Details may not sum to totals because of rounding.

Source: Employment Projections program, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

13 posted on 12/09/2014 9:16:24 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

If you look at the average pay per American it’s been dropping faster than population growth. Common sense tells you that the average income times the amount of Americans should give you the total output of the economy, the GNP. That yields a negative number. Try finding a reputable site that shows GNP is negative. I looked and could find nobody with any standing. (Shadow Statistics looks like they are just trying to sell subscriptions)


14 posted on 12/09/2014 9:41:17 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I meant to say the CHANGE in GNP is negative.


15 posted on 12/09/2014 9:44:17 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
Almost everything that come out these days is strictly Political - all forecasts, job numbers, unemployment, inflation, and almost everything else is suspect.

A veritable propaganda machine in the seat of government itself.

16 posted on 12/09/2014 9:44:21 PM PST by Rapscallion (Obama intends to destroy America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

very telling numbers... labor participation rate among late teens has plummeted and continues to do so. Jobs that teens used to do (mowing lawns & yard work, fast food, grocery, etc.) are now reclassified as ‘jobs americans won’t do’ or are held by entrenched older Americans that do not have enough savings left to retire. Participation way down for younger Americans, way up for illegals and seniors, modestly down for everyone else. Projected that by 2022, the labor participation rate among males will be higher among the 70-74 age group than for the 16-19 age group... just 20 years ago, the rate among teens boys was over three times as high as 70-74 yr old men. wow.


17 posted on 12/09/2014 9:46:46 PM PST by leakinInTheBlueSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Ha, and they wonder why the “folks” have lost confidence in government! Geez, if you have the leaders forcing lower agencies to comply with their demands - well, you get farce and boy do we have it here... The worst of it is that all these supposedly non political agencies run by non political folks are now political - how in the world did that happen? Did all of the Democrats come out of their cocoons just for this President? Can it ever be reversed?


18 posted on 12/09/2014 10:02:13 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: willywill

The method for calculating inflation was recently changed.


19 posted on 12/09/2014 10:17:01 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Anybody see this Presidential propaganda yet? That is why I was trying to document negative GNP. The unemployment is an obvious lie.

20 posted on 12/10/2014 12:02:36 AM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson