Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/10/2014 8:04:35 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: massmike

What is the gay agenda? How did it happen? How did it take over America in such a short time? What is the force behind it? How is it changing the country, and us?

The must-read book that explains the homosexual movement in America

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/14d/reilly-book-review/index.html


2 posted on 10/10/2014 8:06:31 PM PDT by massmike ("You only live once, but it does help if you get to be young twice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

How different America would have been without Bishop Romney.

No gay marriage.
No ObamaCARE.
No Obama.


3 posted on 10/10/2014 8:07:33 PM PDT by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
Yeah. Well. At one time The Supreme Court decided blacks were property.

God straightened that idiocy out in a big way.

4 posted on 10/10/2014 8:15:07 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Excellent analysis, we should all strive to understand why we are losing and learn rather than just whine and blame others. Even a lousy team wins when there is little or weak defense.


5 posted on 10/10/2014 8:15:12 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

“It’s possible that gay couples could on average be much better parents than opposite-sex couples precisely because they don’t have children as a result of sexual passion.”

Adopting a child to molest is apparently not the result of sexual passion


6 posted on 10/10/2014 8:15:31 PM PDT by Viennacon (Obola is a muslim terrorist & his viral illegals need to be deported NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike; ConservingFreedom; Unam Sanctam; x_plus_one; Patton@Bastogne; Oldeconomybuyer; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

9 posted on 10/10/2014 8:20:04 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

It would not have been possible without a public education system that has jammed it down student’s throats for years, hence it has come back to us who funded that same system.

SURPRISE!


10 posted on 10/10/2014 8:20:48 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

“Oh, let’s be nice to them,” as well as, “I don’t care what two adults do behind their own doors.”

That’s what’s brought us here.


11 posted on 10/10/2014 8:23:42 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Actually it doesn’t matter much...

Marriage is a scriptural thing not a legal issue. You can call yourself married if you want but that doesn’t make it so...


13 posted on 10/10/2014 8:24:40 PM PDT by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Lilly livered pastors and soft living led to this crap. Sorry, you don’t just bend over and say that’s the way they are.


14 posted on 10/10/2014 8:25:48 PM PDT by vpintheak (Keep calm and Fire for Effect!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
It is not altogether final.

Nothing is ever final. Did the left quit going after guns despite numerous court losses? Did they quit trying to clamp down political free speech after losing in the Supreme Court? Of course not. Only idiots on "our side" thinks there is such a thing as "settled law" in these matters.

18 posted on 10/10/2014 8:33:34 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

In the current post-constitutional environment, what the court grants today the court is as likely to take away tomorrow.


19 posted on 10/10/2014 8:35:26 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Completely true. However the pansies who help bring this along (The ones who started every debate with “I just want to say how much I love homosexuals”) are still around to grab defeat from victory every step of the way. There are only a very few individuals out there making a sound and compelling statement. This when we have always had all the facts on our side.

We are so far gone on gender type issues that the left is now trying to tell teachers they should not call boys and girls BOYS AND GIRLS because some little tyke out there might think himself a girl or herself a boy. And FEELINGS trump reality every time.


20 posted on 10/10/2014 8:35:39 PM PDT by Penny 4 Thoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

In case you guys are wondering, Brian is refering to the National Organization for Marriage as the pansiefied group that wanted to “play nice.” I have been a faithful donor to NOM for years now, but will now direct my donations to more worthy groups who know and call out the true nature of the absolutely demonic homosexual movement, especially MassResistance, Scott Lively Ministries, and Public Advocate.

Sorry, NOM. Having dinner and wine with Dan Savage only encourgage the demon within him.


22 posted on 10/10/2014 8:37:34 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
The criminality of the courts is to implement draconian suppression of the individual for speaking, writing, or acting according to one's personal beliefs.

Until the "hate crimes" tool was in the repertoire of the defilers, a righteous resistance could not be pushed under cover and buttoned down, leaving the defilers to spew and act out their doctrines at will, obsessively, oppositionally, and defiantly.

Applying this to the individual speaking/acting in the town hall, the business place, the school, the pulpit, the media, and the public square empowers the Defilers to tyrannize their reprovers.

It is the tool to suffocate the beacon of personal liberty into a smoking wick.

The freedom of the individual to teach and practice discrimination in any area of life he wishes needs to be revived, and damn the individual who wishes to rob his fellowman of it.

26 posted on 10/10/2014 11:03:50 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

bump for later


29 posted on 10/10/2014 11:49:14 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is better to offend a human being than to offend God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Jesus is quoted in Matthew chapter 19 that from the beginning of humanity, it was God’s intent that marriage would only be one man and one woman. In Mark chapter 10, Jesus stated that God, not man, joins the husband and wife and the two are “one flesh”, an act that by its very nature can only be heterosexual.

God defines homosexual relations as against His law, that is immoral. In Revelation 22:15, Jesus tells us that anyone
who practices sexual immorality will not be granted eternal life. In the book of Hebrews, the Apostle Paul states that
God will judge “fornicators and adulterers.” But those decrees are outside of the bounds of secular government. We
cannot make law based on it.

Because too many government officials are now hostile to how God defines marriage, government is being used to force me
to recognize and even enable “marriage” that God tells me is morally repulsive. Just as we have a separation of church
and state, we must now have a separation of marriage and state. When marriage is a private matter, then anyone can
enter into any manner of relationship they please, but they cannot use government to impose their definition on others.


30 posted on 10/11/2014 3:40:17 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

bump for later read (half way through) but so far this article is spot on. The arguments on the pro-family side seemed to all be based in feelings not facts. I often wondered if they intended to lose. Thanks for posting.


32 posted on 10/11/2014 6:25:32 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

“Just a decade ago no one would have dreamed that the federal court system would be forcing such a perverse thing on Americans”

Nonsense. Many of us saw it coming three decades ago and more.


33 posted on 10/12/2014 9:58:09 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

35 posted on 10/13/2014 9:52:56 AM PDT by e-gadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson