You Know The Drill
Click the Pic
Hey! FReepers!
Help Fill The Tank!
How About It? Huh?
It Ain't Askin' Too Much
Ya Know....
Self serving....
censured, not censored, Whittington.
This just tells me Palin has ANOTHER admirable trait, loyalty.
Another example I compare it to is Radio HOst G.G. Liddy- he would NEVER say anything bad about Jimmy Carter, and he said so, because Carter pardoned him when he was in prison.
One of the very few things I admire Carter for doing.
She was probably taught by her parents to be kind to old people.
You Know The Drill
Click the Pic
Help Fill The Tank!
How About It? Huh?
It Ain't Askin' Too Much
Ya Know....
So, the writer is saying it’s because he “elevated her to prominence” in 2008? I understand repaying that debt, but that ticket got punched during McQueeg’s last election in 2010. Punching it again now just reduces her to his stature.
I’m glad you posted this, because it reminded me I need to go “Unlike” her page on FB.
Bam. Somebody gets it.
Sarah will always be loyal to McCain..no matter what she will always feel like she owes him something..even though McCain has never really defended her throughout all the nasty attacks she has had to endure she feels like she always has to have his back so she is a very gracious person, unfortunately McCain isnt the same way..maybe, just maybe if McCain had half of what Sarah Palin has there would be hope for him
I am done with her. I can understand the loyalty in 2009, 2010. But this man is a traitor who propped up the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt, and tried to arm Al Queda stooges in Syria — even being photographed with a terrorist who kidnapped and tortured Arab Christians in Aleppo. He targeted Ted Cruz and defended Obamacare funding. And he lied about “building the dang fence” and betrayed his constituents by backing the worst amnesty bill in history. In addition, there are MANY reports that his time in Hanoi was not at all as the myth suggests. Check YouTube to see plenty of interviews with fellow POWs who despise him for that and how he betrayed the POW/MIA families in the Senate.
I am done with her. I can understand the loyalty in 2009, 2010. But this man is a traitor who propped up the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt, and tried to arm Al Queda stooges in Syria — even being photographed with a terrorist who kidnapped and tortured Arab Christians in Aleppo. He targeted Ted Cruz and defended Obamacare funding. And he lied about “building the dang fence” and betrayed his constituents by backing the worst amnesty bill in history. In addition, there are MANY reports that his time in Hanoi was not at all as the myth suggests. Check YouTube to see plenty of interviews with fellow POWs who despise him for that and how he betrayed the POW/MIA families in the Senate.
When I read Sarah Palin’s Facebook post yesterday, I knew the uproar it would create here and having read the entire thread, I wasn’t disappointed.
However, I have a different take. It’s called not burning your bridges.
Suppose Palin intends to run for president. How does unnecessarily preempting McCain’s support help her campaign? If any bridge is to be burned, let McCain do it. He will be the one who comes off as small, considering Palin’s generosity towards him.
On the other hand, Palin already has the support of the tea party movement. Having McCain give her any kind of support can only help with the less supportive factions of the Republican party. At any rate, whatever happens, it won’t be Palin that started the fire that burned that bridge. IMO, she is putting McCain into the box of her choosing.
I think the real reason is that she’s not done with politics. Had she denounced McCain, and ran for office, she would have had to run an independent campaign devoid of any party funding.
Horsesh*t. She didn’t rally to his defense. She made a few positive comments and then outlined, specifically, where she disagrees with McCain. This is just another attempt to marginalize what she actually said about McCain.
Doesn’t alter my high admiration and respect for Palin one single iota. It’s reflective of her nature... rallying, charitable, Christian. Personally, I loathe McCain, and don’t think he’s worthy of being given these “once-a-year” props that Palin offers him. But she’s guided by better spirits than I am. And she also made quite clear the (very important) issues she starkly disagrees with him.
I think Sarah has plans to draw on that account of perpetual goodwill between her and John McCain. I think within the next two years, there will come a time when Sarah is going to need John to, if not outright defend her, or her interests, then, she will need John to stand fast, and not sabotage her oncoming personal goals. Sarah has something in mind, and knows Mr. McCain might ‘forget’ how well the two of them do like and respect each other. This may be her way of saying
“Play Ball with me, Johnny, you lighten up on my Wacko Birds via your Mouths-For-Hire like Lindsay Graham and Peter King,& your little daughter too, and I will hold back openly gloating about your humiliating censure of last week, or the moments when you seem appallingly out of touch and destructive to both the Republican party and the Tea Party. Hey! How about you and young Ted Cruz having lunch next week to make up for that ugly photo of you almost bowing in front of The Devil’s Helper, aka George Soros?”
The author is saying she is lying? That’s what it sounds like.
Spell check is of no help here. One needs to actually know his language.
Well, there was Reagan’s “11th Commandment” ...
Any debt Palin owes McCain was paid with her steadfast VP candidacy and her support of his re-election as Senator.
I see her creating some distance with this statement, which she needs to do. Glad she did it.
I love Sarah and she should be defended, I excepted her support of McCain in his election, because loyalty does matter.
I cannot defend her on this, I understand there is more to the context, but overall it appears supportive.