Cold Case Posse Lt. Mike Zullo Exposes Author John Woodman As A 'Defunct Entrepreneur' And Obot.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=61c_1365228100 ^

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

John Woodman is a one time author, a self proclaimed computer expert who decided to take it upon himself to get recruited, according to CCP Investigator Mike Zullo, and write a book debunking the claims that Obama has a forged birth certificate and that he is not a natural born Citizen. On Friday, April 5, 2013, Lt. Mike Zullo took calls from listeners for one hour on a radio program. As expected, a caller who has been revealed to be a Obama supporter called in and asked Zullo why he didn't consult with John Woodman on the criminal fraud investigation. Zullo at approximately 48:35 explains why. It is a must listen!

[Triple]

FOGBOW

[sport]

Mark

[Yosemitest]

Here are the "Establishment Republicans" to weed out !
In short, the GOP is full of VILE members who'll sell us out in a heartbeat!

Here are the ones that I know about.
What do we do when our side is full of TRAITORS?
I submit the following for proof.

"The Republican leadership did not allow the amendment to be considered. "
Here's the Republicans Leadership Internet Page.

Republican Leadership


John Boehner
Speaker of the House





Eric Cantor
Majority Leader





Kevin McCarthy
Majority Whip





Cathy McMorris Rodgers
House Republican Conference Chair





Greg Walden
National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman





Lynn Jenkins
House Republican Conference Vice Chair





Virginia Foxx
House Republican Conference Secretary





James Lankford
Republican Policy Committee Chairman




Click on the links to tell them what you think!

Check out this link, "Senate Republicans Willfully and Knowingly Lie to Their Constituents (vote to fund Obamacare)".

The following Senators voted to pass the continuing resolution even though it still funds Obamacare.
• Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
  
  
• Sen. JohnBarrasso (R-WY)
  
  
• Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO)
  
  
• Sen. John N. Boozman (R-AR)
  
  
• Sen. Clarence Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
  
  
• Sen. Daniel R. Coats (R-IN)
  
  
• Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS)
  
  
• Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)
  
  
• Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)
  
  
• Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)
  
  
• Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
  
  
• Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND)
  
  
• Sen. John “Johnny” Isakson (R-GA)
  
  
• Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE)
  
  
• Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
  
  
• Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
  
  
• Sen. Jefferson “Jeff” Sessions (R-AL)
  
  
• Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL)
  
  
• Sen. John Thune (R-SD)
  
  
• Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS)
  
  
If any one of those senators tells you they did not vote to fund Obamacare or, in fact, voted against funding Obamacare,
they are being mendacious.
They may have voted for Ted Cruz’s amendment,
but after it failed,
they still knowingly and willingly voted to fund Obamacare.
And now they are lying to their constituents who call them out on it.

Many of these same Senators are also supporting separate legislation to foist a massive tax increase on the American people.

And let's not forget Sen. John McCain, one of Conservatives worst enemies, saying 'I don't understand' GOP filibuster on guns.

Sen. John McCain

[Exmil_UK]

Excellent points. But I only see congress acting in that investigative role if Boehner is replaced as speaker.

His threats block any action, up to a tipping point.

It would take a civil case like Mcinnish v Chapman to knock Obama off his horse like an old Medieval Knight before the “heroes” in congress could act by sticking investigative swords in a prostrate victim.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/133193816/McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman-Brief-of-Appellant-Oral-Argument-Requested-Alabama-Supreme-Court-3-26-2013

A precise and well written Mandamus from the Alabama supreme court could force SOS Beth Chapman to do her job and in doing so de-horse the usurper king.

[Mr Rogers]

“There are no GOP prosecutors willing to initiate a criminal action yet. There has to be a chink in the armor first from a civil case...”

That is NOT how criminal cases work. You never start with a civil case and work your way to a criminal one.

[Mr Rogers]

Hawaii says Obama was born there. You need EVIDENCE he was not. And no one has produced any evidence that Hawaii is lying.

Accusations are not evidence.

[Exmil_UK]

The particular monstrous crime is the one where the GOP-e and DEMs/CP-USA agreed in 2008 to violate article 2 of the US constitution.

Most of those people are still in power/office, and since under the US system Attorney General and DA are used by party politicians as stepping stones in their political careers, the prosecution system will not punish wrong doing by powerful members of the political class itself.

Perversely enough, the political class will do the opposite, and launch a persecution the whistle-blower/honest Sheriff/citizen who dares to challenge his betters.

[Exmil_UK]

Actually no. Onaka is the final word as he is the State registar at Hawaii DOH and he dammed Obama with faint praise.

[the unforgetable non-verifying verifying e-mail from Alvin Onaka to Arizona SOS.]

[Mr Rogers]

Actually, yes. What Hawaii sent to Arizona was ample. Nor was it an email.

[Lee'sGhost]

I forget. Which one is Obama?

[Triple]

Are you referring to the WHLFCOLB.PDF?

Examination of that document tells me that something is very wrong.

Why would a scan have a clipping mask?

(Hint: The clipping mask was placed there by a human editor using an editing program.)

[Tau Food]

Me at post 69:
I will have very little respect for you if I should learn that you are somehow a beneficiary of this scam . . .

You at post 675:
Oh, good grief. You don’t respect me? That hurts.

Geez, I was sorry to read that response. If it means what it appears to mean, that's truly disappointing.

However, where there is life, there is still hope. The next time I run into you, I want you to be able to tell me that you have figured out a way to make an honest living.

And, if you can, return the money to those folks. Good luck. ;-)

[Mr Rogers]

Golly. I guess I don’t have the original. The original was sent to the AZ Sec of State.

Here is a hint: Anything posted on the web is an electronic image...

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

What is the purpose of those extra initials besides Registrar Alvin Onaka’s stamp name?

[Triple]

If it was a legit scan of a paper document like the WH says - THERE WOULD BE NO CLIPPING MASK.

But you know this, and you are just trying obfuscate.

FOGBOW

[rlmorel]

Heh, I haven’t given any money to them, but in view of your response, I just might.

[rlmorel]

Well, it is true that any image sent via email or posted online is electronic.

But there is a difference between an electronic copy of a document, and an electronically composited document.

And this is not a scan of an original document from 1961. It is not only composited, but poorly composited. There is a big, big difference.

From what I have seen (and I didn’t need to be a Photoshop or Illustrator expert to see the problem, even though I have been using both of those programs extensively since about 1992) the document is fraudulent. Given my experience with electronic documents and compositing, it isn’t even close.

As a matter of fact, I admit to being suspicious that it was done so amateruishly. It is almost as if he knows nothing will come of it, and posted it for a laugh.

[Exmil_UK]

It says:

1/ A Birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barrack Hussein Obama II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii

The problem is a “Birth certificate” is a generic term in Hawaii, the precise legal term is “Certificate of Live Birth”

If the verification had said:

1/ A Certificate of Live Birth is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barrack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii

or

1/ Place of Birth: Honolulu Hawaii

Then that would have been verifying that he was born in Hawaii. But it just doesn’t say that.

Also the final sentence:

Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record on our files.

It says the “information” in a copy of the Certificate of live birth provided by Bennett matches the “original record on our files”

What it should say is “...matches the original Certification of live Birth on our records.”