Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”
naturalborncitizen ^ | 4/26/2010 | Leo Donofrio

Posted on 04/26/2010 10:21:49 AM PDT by rxsid

"Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”

It looks like Nbc-Gate is hitting top volume. I’ve witnessed some very desperate blogging propaganda trying to stop the bleeding as the nation finally wakes up to the fact that President Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth. Having been born with dual nationality, he was born with a recognized allegiance to a foreign nation. I have explained previously in great detail why this disqualifies him from being President.

The historical dam is breaking as more and more evidence surfaces proving Obama is not eligible. A reader of this blog who has asked to remain anonymous recently provided further historical proof that Obama is not eligible to be president. The New Englander And Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845) states

The expression ‘citizen of the United States occurs in the clauses prescribing qualifications for Representatives, for Senators, and for President. In the latter, the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.
That is serious on point historical research. At the time of his birth, Obama owed allegiance to Great Britain. That is not disputed, it is admitted by the President himself. And this admission is the true problem Obama faces should this issue ever make its way to the Supreme Court. Obama owed allegiance to great Britain when he was born."

Continued:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/educating-the-really-really-confused-about-nbc-gate/

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; citizen; donofrio; dualcitizenship; naturalborncitizen; nbc; nbcgate; obama; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last
How can a USURPER command our armed forces?
How can a USURPER sign any treaties with foreign governments?
How can a USURPER sign anything into law, let alone the health care monstrosity, or make any Supreme Court nominations?

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

Factcheck.org goes on to say this about Obama Sr., Jr. and the British Nationality Act of 1948:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

 

Even the modern day State Department rules discusses the problems associated with dual citizenship:

7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality:

(e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.

...

the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that dual nationality is a "status long recognized in the law" and that "a person may have and exercise rights of nationality in two countries and be subject to the responsibilities of both." See Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86563.pdf

So, back to the question: "HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?"
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born), a fact backed up by Factcheck.org. Assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth.
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!

Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro * NOT Obama / Soetoro
* This assumes HI birth.
A citizen of 2 countries at birth.

http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com

Furthermore:  Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].) This notification would then have automatically generated the newspaper announcements. (This was the practice of the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin at the time).

Bottom line: Even IF (big IF) he was born in HI, he inherited his father's foreign citizenship as well, making him a US citizen by US law and a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England by inheritance and England's law. He could not be considered a Natural Born Citizen as known by and as intended by the framers.

1 posted on 04/26/2010 10:21:50 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Fred Nerks; BP2; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
Ping!

"Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”"

2 posted on 04/26/2010 10:22:34 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Obamah's daddy was Kenyan, not American.

Obamah not eligible!!

Doesn't matter where he was born, Obamah did not have two US citizens as parents.

3 posted on 04/26/2010 10:24:37 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead; Sparko; trlambsr; True Republican Patriot; 3IDVET; STARWISE; Lumper20; ...

Ping!!


4 posted on 04/26/2010 10:24:53 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2312894/posts?page=242)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

AND THE LACK OF PUBLICITY ON THIS IS APPALLING....


5 posted on 04/26/2010 10:26:24 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The British are coming! The British are coming!
oops-too late.


6 posted on 04/26/2010 10:26:41 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Though ratified by the electoral college and all that, the whole thing is void. Void is void no matter how many in authority try to ratify it.

Hope Lakin keeps the argument very simple.


7 posted on 04/26/2010 10:31:16 AM PDT by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Just as another note on the subject - you can not hold a US Gov’t SECURITY CLEARANCE if you are a dual citizen.


8 posted on 04/26/2010 10:32:04 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The people who voted for this man do NOT care that he has / had dual citizenship. The believe “laws are to be broken” or that this requirement is no longer relavent.
I sometimes believe this was a part of the plan of global governance. Once we have had a dual citizen POTUS precedent has occurred for court ruling for future Presidents with dual citizenship and a “global view”.


9 posted on 04/26/2010 10:32:40 AM PDT by texteacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

keep up the fight


10 posted on 04/26/2010 10:38:43 AM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esquirette
Though ratified by the electoral college and all that, the whole thing is void.

Fraud is fraud. It's a crime. Obama sits in the Oval Office as a result of a fraud. He knowingly and fraudulently provided the Daily Kos with a fraudulent document, in order to fraudulently deceive the American People, and fraudulently usurp an office, wheh he knows, himself, he ain't eligible.

Obama is no different than Bernie Madoff, and he's certainly more of a "crook" than Richard Nixon.

11 posted on 04/26/2010 10:42:55 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; Fred Nerks

Ok, so what have you concluded about Ann/Anna and David/Barry? David’s motorcycle accident/Barry’s scalp scar?

If there were twins, who was the mother? Barry looks enough like Stanley that he could be related and there’s no reason the Dunhams would have raised him if he wasn’t blood related.

Ann had twins in Mombasa. She realized in Kenya she was leaving Sr. - too many wives, Kenyan family not receptive of her, Sr.’s drinking or spousal abuse (Ruth’s reason for divorce, etc. Sr. wouldn’t let Ann leave with both boys so one had to remain in Kenya. Ann took the other to the US.

When and where was the picture of David and Mark taken? Mark won’t say how old he is - why the secrecy? Is Mark really Ruth’s biological child? Could Ruth maybe have merely raised two of Sr.’s sons by other women? Supposedly, David left Ruth’s home because he couldn’t abide her American ways (gee, there’s that “typical white woman” thing again) but imo that doesn’t hold water. What really caused David to chuck it all and leave Ruth’s home? The motorcycle accident date is somewhere between ‘83-87. When exactly was it and where was the usurper at the time?

The there’s that scar on the usurper’s head. Could that have been from a motorcycle accident? What about David? Something suspicious there? Which twin died and which twin was the ghost the old Kenyan man met in “Dreams”?

The Hawaiian vault BC would state “twins”, hence the amendment to the fake COLB or Hawaii’s statement about seeing the record”S”. That in itself isn’t enough to cause him to lock down everything on two continents but what if... What if there’s more to this David person? What if baby footprints don’t match the person in the WH? What if passport fingerprints (there’s that break in and no investigation of Harris’ death) or other documentary evidence don’t match? Talk about a real live Manchurian candidate.


12 posted on 04/26/2010 10:44:09 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The irony is he is as big a traitor to Great Britain as he is to the United States. He hates his mother’s ancestory and apparently the religion of her ancestors (she was athiest).


13 posted on 04/26/2010 10:49:47 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, $10 is all it would take, why spend millions to cover it up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

So this OBOZO knowingly LIED about his Citizenship and Knowingly Hid His Birth Certificate and by these Illegal Acts, Holds the ULTIMATE SECURITY CLEARANCE FOR AMERICA’S MOST SECRET SECRETS!! Sonds like the Most Outrageous of Traitorous Crimes!!
and It appears OBOZO gave up his Law License in 2008 when the news broke that he had Lied on His Law License Application regarding the use of other Aliases other then Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.!


14 posted on 04/26/2010 11:00:32 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot

ZERO would not qualify for the most low-level clearance of “confidential”.......


15 posted on 04/26/2010 11:02:23 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: onyx; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

“It’s a rather clear testimony to the fact that simply being “native born” does not mean that one is “natural born” but “accuracy and intelligent discussion” are not the goals of propaganda. A fraudulent blogger who shall remain nameless attempted to justify Obama’s eligibility with the following lie:

“Some people have confused Alexander Morse’s paper on child born (abroad) to two US citizens being natural born citizens as a necessary requirement. Of course, anyone familiar with Alexander Morse realizes that he never held such a position…”

It appears the liar has selectively failed to read the quote above as well as Mr. Morse’s letter to the Albany Law Journal of December 18th, 1884, which states:

It seems to the undersigned, aside from judicial sanction, that the children of aliens born in the United States are, to use the language of Judge Cooley in another connection, ” subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only in a much qualified sense; ” until they take some steps submitting themselves to the jurisdiction…

This letter was written in 1884 – before Wong Kim Ark was decided. His article quoted above, was written in 1904 – after Wong Kim Ark. The historical evidence proves that Morse held the same point of view before and after Wong Kim Ark. The article and the letter both indicate clearly that Morse would not have agreed Obama was eligible.

History, what a concept.”


16 posted on 04/26/2010 11:07:31 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Which is why I personally can’t understand why ALL Presidential candidates are not REQUIRED to undergo a background check and security clearance!!!


17 posted on 04/26/2010 11:08:07 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Pelosi is a party to the fraud then, since she submitted a Second Certification of the Candidate that Deleted the Phrase “IN Accordance with the Constituion!” which was included on the First Certification “She” Signed! FRAUD!!


18 posted on 04/26/2010 11:08:25 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
would...
tr
td width="5%" >< center >< a href="http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com" target="win0" >< /center >
...work? It would center the pic in the table, wouldn't it?
19 posted on 04/26/2010 11:15:40 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Thank me! I had suspected something like this a couple of years ago. I confirmed my hunch when I found The British Nationality Act of 1948 just before the 2008 elections. I was the first to post it and am proud that it will be the final nail in Obama’s political coffin! :)


20 posted on 04/26/2010 11:18:05 AM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson