Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fusion power 'within reach'
BBC ^ | Monday, 1 October, 2001, 17:06 GMT 18:06 UK | Dr David Whitehouse

Posted on 10/01/2001 1:14:04 PM PDT by RightWhale

Fusion power 'within reach'

Fusion power is "within reach", according to atomic scientists in the UK.

Fusion is the form of nuclear energy that powers the stars. Although, it has many advantages over conventional nuclear power, it has been technically difficult to develop.

The best approach appears to be to confine a superhot gas, called a plasma, in a magnetic field. Some success has been achieved this way using huge experimental fusion reactors.

But now, according to United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) scientists, making smaller versions of the same equipment may be technically easier, cheaper and swifter to develop. The most recent experiments show promise, they claim.

Leaner and swifter

"I believe that if our experiments are successful, and they are promising, we could be designing the forerunner of the first commercial fusion reactor," said UKAEA's Dr Alan Sykes, as he showed BBC News Online around his laboratory at Culham, near Oxford.

Called Mast (Mega Amp Spherical Tokomak), the new equipment could be the design breakthrough needed to make fusion power a reality - at long last.

It is a leaner version of a prototype fusion reactor that has already solved many technical problems.

"Building Mast is like building a fighter aircraft when you have already built an airliner. It could be faster and more efficient at reaching our goal of significant fusion power," said Dr Rob Akers, of the UKAEA.

Star power

Few would argue that fusion power holds great promise.

It is the energy that allows the Sun to shine. But taming the power that lights up the Universe is not proving easy. For almost 50 years, scientists have been trying to harness star power in the laboratory.

To make nuclear fusion happen atoms must first be broken down into electrons and atomic nuclei. This produces an electrically charged gas called a plasma. The bare nuclei must then be forced together so that they merge. Because like charges repel, this is difficult.

At the heart of our Sun, fusion takes place at a temperature of 15 million degrees and a pressure of 100,000 atmospheres.

Because it is not possible to reproduce these conditions on Earth, terrestrial fusion reactors must operate at lower pressures and higher temperatures - about 100 million degrees.

There is also the major problem of confining the plasma.

'Naughty child'

"A plasma is a form of gas that has a great deal of free energy that is just looking for a way out," explained Dr Akers. "You could say that plasmas are like naughty children."

The best way to control the plasma is to "bottle" it, corralling the electrically charged gas in powerful magnetic fields.

So far, the most successful magnetic bottle is a "tokomak", a doughnut-shaped device invented by the Russians. In a tokomak, two magnetic fields are combined to confine the plasma.

The world's largest tokomak is called Jet, the Joint European Torus. It is also at Culham.

Using the Jet, scientists have heated plasma to 300 million degrees - more than is needed to achieve fusion ignition. But magnetic confinement is easier if the prototype reactor is small.

Smaller is better

"That is where Mast comes in," said UKEA's Dr Chris Warwick. "Mast keeps the plasma in a tighter configuration that is more energy efficient."

Controlling the eddies and whirls of the writhing plasma so that it can burst into life as a miniature Sun has been a formidable, and so far only partially met, engineering challenge.

"If we follow the Mast idea and not the Jet one, we could imagine a string of medium-scale fusion reactors instead of a few very big ones," said Alan Sykes.

"There are still very many difficulties but perhaps in a few decades we could have commercial fusion reactors in cities providing cheap pollution-free power," he added.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Just a few more decades. Just a few more generations of post-grad students. Tough to sell this kind of R&D while oil is still so cheap and plentifu.
1 posted on 10/01/2001 1:14:04 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RealScience
Bump to: list
2 posted on 10/01/2001 1:14:49 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If we sold it as "defunding those freaks who fly airplanes into buildings," we might get it more quickly.
3 posted on 10/01/2001 1:17:27 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Funny thing is, a lot of enviros would probably be heartbroken if fusion can be made to work. Imagine a world where nearly pollution-free electric power really would be too cheap to meter. Their calls to "save the earth" by "simplifying our lives" would lose whatever plausibility they currently possess.
4 posted on 10/01/2001 1:18:01 PM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
We have to stop sending Petro$$$ to the arabs.
5 posted on 10/01/2001 1:18:20 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Fusion power 'within reach'

Same headline about 40 years ago. Probably same headline 40 years hence.

6 posted on 10/01/2001 1:21:40 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Prosperity is just around the corner." Herbert Hoover, 1930.
7 posted on 10/01/2001 1:25:40 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"A plasma is a form of gas that has a great deal of free energy that is just looking for a way out," explained Dr Akers. "You could say that plasmas are like naughty children."

If that's the case, you can be sure that the Enviro-whackos will attack this technology with Ritalin.

8 posted on 10/01/2001 1:32:49 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Tough to sell this kind of R&D while oil is still so cheap and plentifu.

... and under the control of possible hardline, extremist, states, or sponsors of terrorists.

I imagine the incentive for such research has gone up a bunch since 9/11/01

9 posted on 10/01/2001 1:37:12 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
No, they could charge that powerlines cause cancer, disorient migratory birds, encourage people to live in formerally inhospitable places... .

As long as there are people on this planet, the envirowackos will maintain there are too many people.

10 posted on 10/01/2001 1:38:51 PM PDT by Procyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I saw an intersting novel that may have some bearing on this. Check it out if you are so inclined.
11 posted on 10/01/2001 1:47:26 PM PDT by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
I imagine the incentive for such research has gone up a bunch since 9/11/01

One might imagine so, but nothing has changed so far. [knock on wood]

Instead, research dollars are being diverted into hiring of warlords and other applied social science.

12 posted on 10/01/2001 1:55:08 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
Pollution-free? Not quite using a tokamak -- the magnets, instruments and housing are huge and would pick up quite a rad dose. Maybe less pollution with other technologies like the laser/pellets -- or even with -- who knows -- estoteria stuff like cold-fusion effects.
13 posted on 10/01/2001 1:56:16 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Really? I thought fusion was relatively clean...thanks for the info. Yet it'd still be cleaner than dumping coalsmoke into the air.
14 posted on 10/01/2001 1:58:28 PM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The side effects of engineering these tokamaks may have had significant benefits though -- big magnets, high pulse voltages and currents power suply and breaker design.
15 posted on 10/01/2001 1:58:29 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
The side effects of engineering these tokamaks

No doubt about it. Every step forward has required advances in electrical technology, materials science, mathematical modeling, and creative thinking. Every step forward so far has meant overcoming a barrier of some kind only to find a fresh barrier right behind it. 1000s of such small barriers have been overcome, and likely 1000s more will need to be overcome.

16 posted on 10/01/2001 2:08:27 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Fusion power 'within reach'

Same headline about 40 years ago. Probably same headline 40 years hence.

There's a story about a man whose cabin was infested by ants. One day, as an experiment, he placed a piece of cake on a plate in the middle of a washtub full of water. When he came back a few days later, he discovered that the ants had reached the cake -- by forming a bridge of dead ants from the rim of the wash tub to the cake in the center.

That's the way it is with scientific knowledge. Every time we fail, we get closer.

Remember the words: "Man will never fly!" They were true for thousands of years. Then they weren't.

17 posted on 10/01/2001 2:25:47 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
Funny thing is, a lot of enviros would probably be heartbroken if fusion can be made to work.

This has already happened. In the early days after Pons and Fleischmann announced they discovered cold fusion, a reporter asked a prominent head of an environmentalist organization what he thought about the promise of nearly unlimited clean fusion power, and he angrily replied that we had as much fusion power as we needed, in the sun.

18 posted on 10/01/2001 4:58:21 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I always did like Spyrogyra.
19 posted on 10/01/2001 5:00:16 PM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
The side effects of engineering these tokamaks may have had significant benefits though -- big magnets, high pulse voltages and currents power suply and breaker design.

Alas, alas!
Too late, too late
For the Clinton shredders!

20 posted on 10/01/2001 8:45:32 PM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson