Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Secret Files of John Huang
NewsMax ^ | September 5, 2001 | Charles R. Smith

Posted on 09/09/2001 5:22:46 PM PDT by Paul Ross

The Secret Files of John Huang

Reprinted from NewsMax.com
The Secret Files of John Huang
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2001
U.S. and U.K. aircraft recently bombarded a Chinese air defense system inside Iraq. What seems like a weekly series of air strikes is actually part of a two-year campaign against an air defense network installed in the Iraqi desert by the Chinese army. China's sale of an advanced air defense system to Iraq is a violation of U.N. arms sanctions against Baghdad.

The Chinese army has little time for the U.N. Beijing made it clear in 1995 that it expected a reward from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia for not helping Iraq during the Gulf War. According to documents discovered at the U.S. Commerce Department, convicted Chinagate figure John Huang possessed detailed information that the Chinese government expected large weapons purchases from Kuwait.

"China also remains the only member of the UN Security Council that has not been awarded a large military contract from Kuwait. It is understood that the Chinese are pressing this issue with the Kuwait Government," notes the U.S. Commerce Department document.

Huang, a former Lippo banker and Clinton appointee at the U.S. Commerce Department, cited his Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself nearly 2,000 times when asked if he was acting as an agent for the Chinese army. The documents from Huang's files were obtained from the Commerce Department using the Freedom of Information Act.

According to the Huang's files, in 1995 Kuwait allocated $1.3 billion to upgrade its field artillery. The Kuwaiti arms buy forced U.S.-based United Defense to compete with Chinese artillery maker China North Industries - Norinco.

"Heavy pressure from Chinese Government to select Norinco," states the Commerce Department document found in Huang's files. "The Chinese offer is of particular concern in that its howitzer has been recently modernized and configured to NATO standards for ammunition interoperability."

Despite the pressure, Norinco lost the contract to United Defense. It is well worth noting that the same Middle East allies under "heavy pressure" in 1995 from China to buy Norinco artillery are now watching Beijing upgrade Saddam Hussein's missile system.

China Plays the North Korea Card

Iraq is not the only major buyer of Chinese made weaponry. China exported advanced anti-ship cruise missiles to Iran in 1996 and sold supersonic fighters to Sudan in 1999. China was recently caught selling M-11 missiles to Pakistan in violation of several treaties. The export brought immediate sanctions from the Bush administration against a Chinese army company.

While U.S. President Bush is preparing to travel to Beijing to talk about missiles, Chinese President Jiang Zemin elected to visit North Korea and meet with Kim Jong Il. Jiang's visit to North Korea was a clear message to Washington on missile warfare.

Jiang and Kim are worried that the Bush anti-missile defense system will undercut profits and power. North Korea is often cited as a reason for a limited U.S. missile defense. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have expressed interest in a joint missile defense against North Korea and China.

Following the recent meeting between Kim and Jiang, unconfirmed diplomatic reports have filtered out of Beijing, saying that North Korea had agreed to delay missile testing until 2003.

Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi once called North Korea to be as "lips are to teeth" for the Chinese army. Kim's reported delay is as much a threat as it is a promise to shoot another missile over Tokyo and on its way to Los Angeles.

Patriot Missile Defense

At least Bush will go to Beijing with some defense cards. China and North Korea face the U.S. Patriot missile. The U.S. Army deploys the Patriot missile to protect U.S. troops stationed in South Korea against North Korean ballistic missiles.

The anti-missile of Gulf War fame continues to be the front-line defense against missile attack around the world. The Patriot system has also been sold to Japan and Taiwan for missile defense against communist China.

How much does China know about the Patriot missile? Vice President Dick Cheney, while serving as secretary of defense to the previous President George Bush, accused Israel of selling Patriot missile technology to China after the Gulf war, a report hotly denied by Israel.

However, the Clinton administration, placing weapons exports in the hands of Assistant Secretary of Commerce Huang, made Patriot missile data available for the plucking. According to the files in Huang's office, South Korean defense forces were considering a major purchase of Patriot missiles.

Huang's missile documents contain details of a Nov. 3, 1994 meeting requested by Raytheon, the U.S. manufacturer of the Patriot missile. According to the documents, the meeting was held at the Commerce Department.

"Thank you for agreeing to host a meeting with representatives of Raytheon at 2:30 pm next Thursday, November 3," wrote Elliot.

"As we discussed, the purpose of the meeting is to brief you and other Commerce Department officials concerning Raytheon's efforts to sell the Patriot missile system to South Korea. Needless to say, we would like to request Commerce Department support for these efforts - and, in particular, for accelerated South Korean procurement of the Patriot."

Huang obtained detailed Patriot missile data from Raytheon including "Coalition" military tactical information on North Korean offensive missiles and a "U.S. Army analysis" of South Korean defenses. According to a Raytheon attachment, titled "Modernization of South Korean Air Defense", South Korea has no defense against a North Korean missile attack.

"The North Korean threat consists of primarily of high performance aircraft, cruise missiles and an extensive family of tactical ballistic missiles. The SCUD tactical ballistic missiles deployed by North Korea are a serious threat to all populated areas and industrial areas and military forces in South Korea," noted the Raytheon documentation.

"North Korea, as a leading developer and exporter of these weapons, will continue to increase the accuracy of its tactical ballistic missiles which raises the specter of selective destruction of key industrial assets such as nuclear power facilities. A Patriot defense can counter this growing threat and preclude the use of this threat as a future means of coercion," states the Raytheon document.

Weapons of Terror

The tiny North Korean dictatorship is China's closest ally in the Far East for good reason. China and North Korea fought together in the Korean War. Today they depend on ballistic missiles to fight a future war. It is no surprise that they share and export missile technology.

Before traveling to Beijing, President Bush should take the time to consider why John Huang had so many files on U.S. weapons like the Patriot anti-missile.

"The destabilizing influence of North Korea's tactical ballistic missile program must be countered with a defensive capability that can deny the use of these missile as weapons of terror against the people of South Korea," concluded the Raytheon document from Huang's files.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
China/Taiwan
Clinton Scandals
North Korea
A product that might interest you:
Trooper Patterson`s tapes: More Than Sex: Secrets of Bill & Hillary Revealed!


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Tardy, I know, but still, no one appears to have picked this item up...! Must have gone 'under the radar' ...
1 posted on 09/09/2001 5:22:46 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChaseR,Alamo-Girl,
FYI--
2 posted on 09/09/2001 5:30:08 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS,LSJohn,OK,OKCSubmariner,Inspector Harry Callahan,Black Jade,hopalong,Travis McGee,Patriot76
FYI.
3 posted on 09/09/2001 5:34:30 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Because NO ONE is Above the Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backhoe,JohnHuang2,FR_addict,Mudboy Slim,ALOHA RONNIE,crypt2k,Diogenesis,dennisW,Revel,pttt,Clancy J
FYI
4 posted on 09/09/2001 5:36:46 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Where the Governor is Looking For UFOs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Dems will do their best to take missle defense card away from Bush. Wonder why they are so set against it.
5 posted on 09/09/2001 5:41:19 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Can we say DIS-Loyal? Would rather see the U.S. bombed and defeated. Shows where their true loyalties lie... We don't call them RATS for nothing...
6 posted on 09/09/2001 5:51:34 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Where NOTHING is Allowed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
...The Enemy is now Within =

...The National Liberation Front DEMOCRAT Party of America =

...The War has Come Home.

Signed:..Vet/Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.lzxray.com

7 posted on 09/09/2001 6:28:13 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
bttt!
8 posted on 09/09/2001 6:52:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Democrat=liberal=socialist=communist. They are our allies don't you know. Clinton always said so anyway. I believe the words "strategic partner" were the words he preferred.

The sooner everyone comes to understsnd these Democrats are Marxists the better off we will all be!

9 posted on 09/09/2001 7:18:41 PM PDT by america76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Huang took the Fifth 2,000 times about being a Chicom agent. You don't suppose he had something to hide!? A guy who knew Bill back in Little Rock? Who had easy access to the Oval Office? Whose security check was waived by Bill Clinton? Who got special CIA briefings at the Commerce Department? And who was, of all things, a fundraiser for the DNC?

Why would this Clinton intimate need the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination?

10 posted on 09/09/2001 7:31:17 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
Bump for you Ronnie.
11 posted on 09/09/2001 7:33:53 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross, backhoe, flamefront, Old Lady, Ragtime Cowgirl, abigail2
backhoe, have to hit the rack...I'll review this in the morning, thanks for this ping -
Thanks Paul for posting this.
12 posted on 09/09/2001 8:03:14 PM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Thanks for flaging me for this article.
13 posted on 09/09/2001 9:49:26 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks for the heads up!
14 posted on 09/09/2001 9:57:53 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Tying Huang around the Democrats' neck turned out to be a little tricky when Bush chose Elaine Chao for his cabinet. Conservatives started digging around and didn't like what they found. Republicans Mitch McConnell and Al D'Amato seemed to like Huang's money and Chinese connections, too. When Huang's ties to the Chinese Army were pointed out, both the Clinton campaign and D'Amato's returned the money. McConnell did not. Does that make him a commie? Michelle Malkin in Capitalism Magazine "In defense of individual rights", hardly a pinko leftist apologist medium, noted this on Jan. 21, 2001:
Elaine Chao, President-elect Bush's second nominee to head the Department of Labor, is a successful Washington insider. As a former official in the Bush and Reagan administrations and wife of U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), her conservative credentials are almost impeccable. Almost. While she travels in all the right GOP circles, she also happens to be a good friend of strident Democrat labor leaders and a longtime acquaintance of President Clinton's criminal campaign fund-raiser, John Huang.
The infamous Huang contributed millions of dollars to the Democratic Party -- and to a handful of Republicans, including Chao's husband -- from illegal foreign sources during the past decade.
Chao's friend, Sen. D'Amato, returned the contributions Huang gave him. However, Chao's husband, Sen. McConnell, has declined to return his contributions from Huang. (He has also declined to return a contribution from his former employee, Maria Hsia -- another convicted campaign-finance felon who illegally enlisted foreign nuns and monks at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple as straw donors for Vice President Al Gore.)
--Raoul
15 posted on 09/09/2001 10:26:32 PM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
I have no doubt that China is the enemy that the US will come to fear the most. Even more than the USSR.
16 posted on 09/09/2001 11:42:14 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
A Tip O' the Hatlo Hat to you....


17 posted on 09/10/2001 3:22:28 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: johnhuang2
What have you been up to? and when did you start these secret files? :)
18 posted on 09/10/2001 3:50:22 AM PDT by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Monday morning bump! One quibble: The article refers to Assistant Secretary of Commerce Huang. He was actually a Deputy Assistant Secretary during his time on the public payroll (July 18, 1994 - December 1995). The lesser post did not require Senate confirmation. The Assistant Secretary to whom Huang reported was Charles Meissner, who died on April 3, 1996, while accompanying Ron Brown's "I won't go down alone" trip.
19 posted on 09/10/2001 5:16:04 AM PDT by Steve Schulin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
I still question the death of Barbara Wise in the Commerce Department building itself. It was very strange.
20 posted on 09/10/2001 5:34:47 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson