Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: snippy_about_it; SAMWolf
Another terrific post. It's really interesting to combine the modern tour and perspective with the historical facts.

Now, the Confederate line was broken in its center. With one quick push, McClellan could have cut Lee's army in two, then destroyed it. He had fresh troops ready to go. But he never gave the order to attack.

"It would not be prudent," he explained.

McClellan. Grrrrrr!

Why is Antietam overlooked by comparison to Gettysburg? The victory, if you can call it that, was not as clearcut. The Gettysburg story is full of drama, heroics and luck, although there is plenty of all three at Antietam. I think the main reason is that Antietam leaves us with a sense of sadness, the same sadness we feel when we think that Americans were once so divided that fought and killed each other is horrific numbers. Antietam is a story of two armies clawing, hacking and killing each other in what still stands as the bloodiest day in American military history. The tactics were frontal attack, brute force. Little credit goes to either General. Lee was saved by great good luck and McClellan's incompetance. McClellan's dithering prevented a great victory. I think all this is why when people visit Gettysburg they feel exhilerated while at Antietam people feel sadness and become silent.

60 posted on 09/17/2003 10:27:20 AM PDT by colorado tanker (USA - taking out the world's trash since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
I've only ever been to the Bull Run battle field and all the surrounding area that it encompassed.

There besides the sadness, I had the feeling of wonder seeing the terrain and putting up with 90 degree heat and humidity trying to imagine what it was like to wear the heavy clothes they did and battle on that terrain.
63 posted on 09/17/2003 10:46:34 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker
Rebels never had a better chance

TERRY HEADLEE

The Confederacy was on a roll during the summer of 1862. Just a year after the outbreak of the Civil War, rebel troops had managed to make a presence along a 1,000-mile front stretching from Sharpsburg, Md., to Newtonia, Mo.

For the moment, it appeared the Confederates were on the verge of accomplishing their goal of becoming a separate nation, said James M. McPherson, a Pulitzer Prize-winining Civil War author.

From June 26 until Sept. 17, rebel armies won numerous key battles, driving Union troops from the Peninsula in Virginia and taking a smashing victory at the Battle of Second Manassas in August.

"Lee already gave the Union a one-two punch. He invaded the North in early September hoping to make it 'three and out,'" McPherson siad.

Then came Antietam.

Historians would later peg Antietam, and not Gettysburg as is widely believed, as the turning point of the Civil War.

By the time the cannon smoke cleared after nearly 12 hours of hellacious fighting, Confederate forces led by Gen. Robert E. Lee were in full retreat from Sharpsburg.

The battle ended Lee's high hopes for a major victory in his first invasion of the North.

And in the next three weeks, the Confederacy would suffer a chain of losses and retreats.

"Antietam changed the momenum for the Confederacy from being on a roll, to being in retreat," McPherson said.

Suddenly, Lee had failed to win Maryland, a border state, and the Confederacy was no longer seen as invincible.

That gave a much-needed boost to the morale of the Union soldiers.

Even worse for the Confederacy, Lincoln seized the moment to issue the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, freeing all slaves in Confederate states as of Jan. 1, 1863.

That's significant because it elevated the war to a higher level by converting it from a struggle over states' rights to the higher moral cause of slavery.

That practically ended the Confederates' quest for diplomatic recognition from Britain and France.

The two countries weren't anxious to get involved in a moral war.

Recognition could have turned the Civil War into a world war if the Union attempted to stop the two world powers from shipping supplies to the South.

"It almost certainly would have ended the blockade of the South," McPherson said. "That's why what happened at Antietam had world importance."

"Antietam was a crucial turning point. It was important for Maryland, nationally and internationally," said McPherson, a Princeton University professor whose 1988 book, "Battle Cry of Freedom," won the Pulitzer Prize.

No other Civil War battle can make that claim, he said.

Not even Gettysbug.

Historians say Gettysburg is often mistakenly considered the turning point of the Civil War.

It was fought over three days with more total casualties, about 50,000.

It also marked the Confederate's highest penetration of the North.

The battle was a victory for the Union. Lee was forced to retreat to Virginia and never again undertook a major offensive.

McPherson said even if Lee had won at Gettysburg, the Confederacy lost a significant battle at Vicksburg, Miss., the next day.

That Union victory gave federal troops vital control over the Mississippi River and doomed any hope for the Confederacy to win the war.


67 posted on 09/17/2003 12:06:41 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Schizophrenia beats being alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson