Sheesh, even you old FReepers don't read the articles :-)
Actually, I did click over and read the source article. There was also a video and a link to additional information, but the page I visited only said that this woman had gotten a job under her fake identity.
Other than the job, I didn't see anything which cited personal and financial gain via fraud.
That's why I wondered about the sentence. Since financial gain would put the crime on a whole different level and have a significant bearing on the sentence, it would have been proper to mention that fact in the summary article, as opposed to requiring me to watch video and/or click over to yet another page to ascertain that fact.
Thus, even after performing a modicum of due diligence by clicking at least once, I still didn't see the evidence relating to financial fraud and personal gain. It was rather buried...