[radical4capitalism]

Although the RLC is officially neutral on the question of abortion, I would venture to say that the vast majority of RLCers are pro-life. I myself am very prolife, and I see no conflict or dichotomy with participating in an organization that is neutral on the issue.
I believe that abortion is not and should not be a litmus test for participation in the RLC. Our end goal here is smaller government, and more individual freedom.
For more info on the principled, libertarian position on abortion, visit Libertarians for Life:
http://www.L4L.org

[billbears]

I can respect that. But would the RLC support the separate states making an enforceable decision at their level on the issues? I'm of the same thought on drug enforcement. I do not believe it is the right of the general government to enforce or enact drug laws. However I do believe the states can and should enforce their own separate drug laws. Several problems I do see arising with that however. One being that certain states would have a disproportionate amount of their budget spent on drug enforcement (i.e. Florida, California, New York)