Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: tcg
And, that, fellow Freepers, is why the First Amendment must be expanded to protect free speech in private employer-employee relationships. Maybe a SCOTUS more enlightened and open-minded than the present one (and that's not hard to imagine) will remedy this error in a future decision.
44 posted on 12/19/2013 7:24:04 AM PST by steelhead_trout (MYOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steelhead_trout

Very slippery slope.

I would prefer the free market take care of this. If there’s demand from the public, in this case Duck Dynasty, someone will put it on the air.

I don’t want to be told by the gov that I can’t fire someone who reps my company or product that voices something I’m opposed to.

I think its a shame that our world now prefers the evil over good but I don’t want the gov involved in more of my business then it already is.


52 posted on 12/19/2013 8:55:14 AM PST by PACAP1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson