To: heartwood
Look a small child is not able to work...they are supported by the parents. .and if no parents larger society or government steps in...and as a child grows in abilities they shoulder more responsibility till they are independent. ..in the degree a person is physically or mentality handicapped and not able to achieve independent. .the parents family or state continues the level of support needed........it is able body persons that are able to support themselves...that choose to stay a child and want a nanny government to take care of them and the government that want to control it people as parent to that child...that are the problem ..the state in effect cripples it people for control..the self crippled types then burden the tax payers and in effect rob from the truly needed and handicapped. .....
16 posted on
12/31/2012 2:49:25 PM PST by
tophat9000
(American is Barack Oaken)
To: tophat9000
Look a small child is not able to work that's nonsense, before child labour laws children worked very effectively. Child Labour laws were the first great progressive triumph. When children worked the native population expanded, children had a function, so Americans produced them. You need to seriously get beyond your Rooseveltian progressivist assumptions. YES CHILD LABOUR IS A GOOD THING. BURN ME AT THE STAKE
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson