Not at all. However a very small, small portion contrary to what any 'conservative' writer may insinuate. Shall we go through the supporters now of all candidates? Besides it being too easy, it wouldn't be right to go there. Every candidate has a group of crazy followers and except for these 'reports' from Fox et. al., or a few quotes from reporters digging to find the craziest person on the scene, I'm not seeing it. But again so what?
My point is Dr. Paul's stance is he's going to follow the Constitution. If the voters you named want to vote for him, fine let 'em. Many of them will realize they'll have wasted their vote two years from now since if it isn't in the Constitution, he's not going to do it. Republicans have used the Old Right, Classical Liberals and libertarians for years promising something but yet once in office completely ignoring it.
The difference here is Dr. Paul isn't promising them a single thing. Not one iota to forward their agenda. If it's not in the Constitution they're going to be sorely disappointed. And knowing what the man stands for, I know they'll be disappointed
And I don’t watch Fox News or listen to Hannity. But I am curious to why you criticize both? Usually Fox and Hannity are the favorite targets of Democrats and liberals. Are you going to tell me to stop listening to Rush too?
I know this is going to come as a shock to you but many in the Old Right can level just as much fire against the Republican 'mainstream' for their continued ignorance of the Constitution as any liberal or Democrat can.
More than a few military people donating today...