[Tai_Chung]

If we pulled our troops out of the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere I have no doubt the United States would be at much greater risk of attack and the next war front would be on the US boarder. We would have no military allies because Ron Paul doesn’t believe in them. He would not even help England or Australia.

The foreign policy disaster would exceed even that of Jimmy Carter.

[NapkinUser]

Ron Paul foreign policy: U.S. out of UN.

Good enough for me.

[George W. Bush]

If we pulled our troops out of the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere I have no doubt the United States would be at much greater risk of attack and the next war front would be on the US boarder. We would have no military allies because Ron Paul doesn’t believe in them. He would not even help England or Australia.

He does believe in allies. I don't know why Paul-haters have to make this stuff up. It's like a competition to see who can spew the biggest lies about him.

Anyway, the globalists on FR can hate him as much as they want. And if RP is our nominee, you can always vote for Hitlery. The Xlintons love that global empire and world policeman stuff.

[BigTom85]

If we pulled our troops out of the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere I have no doubt the United States would be at much greater risk of attack and the next war front would be on the US boarder. We would have no military allies because Ron Paul doesn’t believe in them. He would not even help England or Australia.

We have already pulled our troops out of parts of Asia after conflicts (Korea and Vietnam). Both of those examples were a far cry from victory for the US.

The best way to get along with a nation is to TRADE with them. Our relationship with Vietnam has improved big time... a lot of the improvement is because of trade.