[gorush]

"Libertarians(and conservatives, IMHO) leery of Paul should ask themselves (while bearing in mind that of course no one, certainly no libertarian, is under any obligation to support or advocate or vote for any politician ever): Have we ever seen a national political figure better in libertarian terms—better on taxes, on drugs, on spending, on federalism, on foreign policy, on civil liberties? And for the pragmatic, cosmopolitan, mainstream libertarian: Why is Ron Paul the place where making the non-existent best the enemy of the good becomes the right thing to do?"

I can't think of a better final response on FR than this! Bye Republicans.

[ontap]

See Ya!

[Soul Seeker]

Yes, I’ve seen better on foreign policy and I strongly disagree with the libertarian stance on drugs.

I’d wager if I looked I could even find better records elsewhere on spending, taxes, federalism and civil liberties but I’ll stick with what I know and say a man who suggests we’d stage an attack to increase support for the war isn’t someone I am ever going to be fond of.

[MNJohnnie]

Don’t let the door hit your butt on the way out. Your sort of Always Whining 100%ers are nothing but a drag on everything you touch.

See NOTHING in life is ever perfect. To be effective in politics you have to accept that basic factual reality. The 100%er club, who wrongly call themselves “Conservatives”, are too arrogantly stupid to realize that fact. So they simply drag everyone down with their perpetual pouting because their political glass is 30% empty.

Better they simply go away and fight among themselves then waste our time with their fundamental political incompetence and rabid whining.