Replies

I disagree with Tancredo on important matters and would not vote for him in all likelihood (not that he is likely to be nominated in any event) but, whatever Tancredo's drawbacks, he is a patriot and a conservative. Antiwar AntiAmerican Al Qaeda propagandist has been worst in show and has proven to be neither. He is an Al Qaeda propagandist because he spent the first debate whining about how we should see the Iraq War from the Islamofascist point of view and inexcusably suggest some sort of moral equivalency between Islamofascists and American patriots. Those are Al Qaeda's talking points and he is spewing them in the debates and generally.

A baseball pitcher is a baseball pitcher because he pitches baseballs. A baseball slugger is a baseball slugger because he slugs baseballs. Someone who pitches propaganda for our nation's Al Qaeda enemies is an Al Qaeda propagandist. This requires more brain cells to figure out than are possessed by "paleowhatevers" who generally seem easily confused as to what side they, as Americans, are supposed to be on in this war. Normal folks see that paleoPaulie and the Paulistinians are clearly on the wrong side and unfit to lead our nation.

This is a free country (at least until the paleowhatevers manage to get their towel-wrapped Islamofascistbuds to impose Sharia Law here) and you are entitled to adopt the heresies of your choice. You are not free to expect much less demand that patriots and conservatives respect your choices when you side with a candidate who sides with the enemies of our nation during war.

If that makes me "narrow-minded" so be it. Guilty! Guilty! Guilty! Ignorance would be the characteristic of the paleowhatevers who reflexively side with the radical left in opposing our nation and its interests. The paleos whine, witch (sp.?), moan and complain every time our nation does something truly American like retaliate against those who think 9/11 was a good idea. That is what is really sad. Betraying your country in time of war is NOT acceptable. Pat Buchanan understands that and paleoPaulie does not. While Pat opposed the war before it began, he has judiciously zipped his lip after it began. Unlike paleoPaulie and the Paulistinian political harem, Pat knows the wages of nakedly undermining one's nation at war and paleoPaulie and company are just beginning to learn that hard lesson.

Your blase attitude as to enemies who struck the World Trade Center and much more importantly our Pentagon is what is really sad. And puhleeeeze spare us the Al Qaeda and Demonrat and paleo propaganda about the hijackers being mostly Saudis which is about as relevant as their eye color. This enemy transcends national boundaries and allegiances and must be crushed wherever found. The now executed Sodamn Insane (and his thankfully ventilated spawn Uday and Kucay) harbored Abbu "Achille Lauro" Abbas (suddenly dead of a heart attack at the beginning of the war) and Abu Nidal (died "a suicide" of five or six gunshots to the back of his head on his Baghdad apartment/hiding place at the very beginning of the war).

Who knows? Maybe it was Dubya's fault. Everything else seems to be, at least to those who agree with International A.N.S.W.E.R., Ramsay Clark and paleoPaulie.

Why don’t you man up. Your fear is unbecoming and reads like a frail old menopausal women who sees terrorists behind every bush. Adults did not exhibit as much fear looking down the barrel of 10,000 nukes armed and pointed at us in 1962 from Russia as you do here with your obsessive fear of a bunch of cave dwelling flakes with no military, air force or navy to attack us with, and using homemade ordinance(IEDs) made out of artillery shells as their major weapons system.

You're just another fruitloop expecting to see hordes of long knifed muslims storming the beaches at Malibu. Keep your big government kneepads on...Just don't expect divine protection from it for your servicing it.

Your blase attitude as to enemies who struck the World Trade Center and much more importantly our Pentagon is what is really sad.

When Bush makes statements that finishing off Bin Laden is just unimportant, it's not the rest of us who are being "blase".

Who knows? Maybe it was Dubya's fault. Everything else seems to be, at least to those who agree with International A.N.S.W.E.R., Ramsay Clark and paleoPaulie.

If he won't direct the troops to find and kill Osama and the rest of the gang who killed 3000 Americans on 9/11, just how do you manage to blame Ron Paul?

You seem to object that anyone reminds you that Osama is still at large. Thank goodness that Ron Paul keeps raising the issue. The Bush administration has finally snapped out of its coma and is preparing for action inside Waziristan to kill Osama's gang and keep them from attacking America and the West again.

It seems BushCo almost has to be forced to do the most fundamental things. Like show any interest in avenging the murders of our citizens on 9/11.