Posted on 08/18/2019 7:05:12 PM PDT by Al Hitan
As a matter of fact that was a response to ALL your threads. Choose one. It doesn’t matter.
Simeon was:
[25] And behold there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, and this man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel; and the Holy Ghost was in him.
[26] And he had received an answer from the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Christ of the Lord. [27] And he came by the Spirit into the temple. And when his parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the law, [28] He also took him into his arms, and blessed God, and said: [29] Now thou dost dismiss thy servant, O Lord, according to thy word in peace; [30] Because my eyes have seen thy salvation,
[31] Which thou hast prepared before the face of all peoples: [32] A light to the revelation of the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel. [33] And his father and mother were wondering at those things which were spoken concerning him. [34] And Simeon blessed them, and said to Mary his mother: Behold this child is set for the fall, and for the resurrection of many in Israel, and for a sign which shall be contradicted; [35] And thy own soul a sword shall pierce, that, out of many hearts, thoughts may be revealed.
And so did Anna:
[38] Now she, at the same hour, coming in, confessed to the Lord; and spoke of him to all that looked for the redemption of Israel.
Luke Chapter 2
Simple. It's called the Immaculate Conception.
Ok, I pick this one.
Do you even understand to what I am referring? LOL
Why?
Is that unreasonable to conclude?
Your choice. They’re all the same tripe. Forming a religious system purely out of reading between the lines. Worthless, because IT DOESN’T EXIST, NONE of it.
And yet, the deception continues, catechism teaching by Vatican conventions by extra biblical nonsense, all wrapped in incense scented shiny paper. Looks GREAT. SMELLS ROTTEN.
Okay, ebby, can God act in contradiction to His nature?
Elizabeth did NOT say *the mother of my God*.
The phrase *mother of God* is not found anywhere in Scripture. It’s a Catholic fabrication because they seened to think that they could improve on the work of the Holy Spirit in inspiring Scripture.
THAT is chutzpah!
1 Corinthians 15:46-55 But it is not the spiritual that is first but the natural, and then the spiritual. The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven. As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven.
I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed.
For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: “Death is swallowed up in victory.” “O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?”
Well, then Mary did not need to be sinless because what you all claim God did for Mary being born of sinful parents, He could have just as easily done for Jesus being born of a sinful mother.
And Jesus did not have a sin nature because He did not have a human father through whom the sin nature comes.
And He would not be contaminated with sin through simple human contact. That’s not how one acquires a sin nature.
Not likely........
You Catholic tool, in the Twelve hundreds not one of your religion's leadership knew a single fact about haploid and diploid chromosomes. And I suspect you don't weither!
The embryo age of Jesus may have, could have come from King David directly, without going through all the generations from David to Mary. YOU DO NOT KNOW and neither do I. The fable-filled religion opf Catholicism fabricates all manner of mythos to bring Semiramis back into vogue. How much longer do you think you can help that lie persist?
She said "mother of my Lord". As in Lord God.
THAT is chutzpah!
No, what's chutzpah is not recognizing the Lord as God.
Reduced to insults and misspellings. Oh my.
None of your wild postulations are in your “sola scriptura”.
So how far back does the immaculate go, ebby? For Mary to be sinless her Mother had to be, etc. It is your false Christianity religion of Catholicism which claims Mary was sinless so that Jesus would be born sinless, so how many generations back does your false chrsitiantiy claim the sinless brths?
Follow the thread. Immaculate Conception.
I have large, old fingers. Focus, Catholic tool. Focus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.