Posted on 07/26/2017 10:35:48 AM PDT by ebb tide
Troll. As always.
Some things change. Some things don’t.
But that’s a terribly complex thought for you, I know.
You flatter yourself.
You never argue. You just post irrelevant straw-man insults.
If the priest who celebrates Mass in a breakaway church was ordained in the Roman Rite, then the Apostolic Succession has not been broken and his power to consecrate the Holy Eucharist remains intact.
Proving yet again, it is the Romam Catholic who is usually the first to get personal and/or resort to profanity when the argument goes against them.
You should go to Ann Barnhardt’s site and spend some time looking around barnhardt.biz
I certainly do not. Glad we agree.
I only care what God revealed about it... and what the Apostles thought.
And you're a priest??
I don't consider considering what the Apostle's taught or did not teach to be boilerplate. If you do, it's on you.
But he's also a Modernist at heart.
http://www.traditio.com/tradlib/masslat.pdf
I’ll leave you with something to think about:
Which churches are truly the “breakaway churches”? The ones that have maintained the pre-Vatican II Catholic Faith? Or the ones that profess and teach the Vatican II faith?
Here’s another website to check out:
And here is a specific page where a former Novus Ordo priest, Fr Michael Oswalt, realizes that he needed to make a change:
http://www.cmri.org/02-oswalt-letter-to-rockford-diocese.shtml
Catholic ping!
Not good.
Thanks for posting.
If sola scriptura is true, then it MUST be taught in scripture.
Sola scriptura is not taught in scripture.
Therefore, sola scriptura is not true.
You are a bitter, hateful, intellectually dishonest anti-Catholic bigot. Only a bigot posts comments that “the Roman Catholic” does this and “the Roman Catholic” does that.
Your posts consist of stock insults, red herrings, and straw men.
And you have a cut-and-paste response, feigning victimhood, when you are called on it.
Among your most laughable claims is that you engage in “argument.”
Proving yet again, it is the Roman Catholic who is usually the first to get personal and/or resort to profanity when the argument goes against them.
Arthur,
That is a (sadly common) false argument you just put forth.
I’m surprised that this wasn’t covered in your seminary courses.
I will Help.
.............snip..............
REPLY: We are offered an argument of the following form:
(1) Sola Scriptura = All true propositions are stated in Holy Scripture.
(2) Sola Scriptura is not stated in Holy Scripture.
(3) Therefore, Sola Scriptura is not a true proposition.
But in fact, the argument should be of the form:
(1) Sola Scriptura = All truths necessary to salvation are stated in Holy Scripture.
(2) Sola Scriptura is not stated in Holy Scripture.
(3) Therefore, Sola Scriptura is not a truth necessary to salvation.
http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/lutherantheology.kiefersolascriptura.html
Best
Do a word search on "write".
You'll get the idea.
If the Bible is not the final authority to appeal to then you have to allow the Mormon the Book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. You'd have to allow the Muslim the Koran.
She’s in Spokane with Post Falls and Coeur dAlene nearby. I wonder what will happen to FSSP in CDA?
To a Latin Mass Catholic those objections are laughable.
If the non-Catholics do not want to get into arguements with the Catholics on Catholic subject threads, there an answer. Kindly stay out of those threads have issues of interest to Catholics and problem is solved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.