Skip to comments.
Pre-Vatican II [Non Caucus Open thread]
Posted on 06/11/2017 12:57:49 PM PDT by Trad Bishop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: miss marmelstein
I assume this has the approval of the owner or his mods? And it doesnt address my concern about the lurkers here who are always looking to break down the Caucus designation even for something as minor as mentioning Luther in passing. This thread is disqualified for the caucus label because the thread itself criticizes non-Catholic denominations.
It has nothing to do with anyone searching for a random mention of Luther in passing in a reply.
Do try to get with the program.
21
posted on
06/11/2017 6:42:37 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Trad Bishop
Our intent is to unify in love those who want to imitate Christ. *OUR* intent?
Just who all are you representing?
And how many of you all are posting here under your screen name?
22
posted on
06/11/2017 6:44:32 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Trad Bishop
Our intent is to unify in love those who want to imitate Christ. *OUR* intent?
Just who all are you representing?
And how many of you all are posting here under your screen name?
23
posted on
06/11/2017 6:46:02 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Trad Bishop
Theologically, there is so much difference that the protestants have no problem bashing Mary, calling Her a terrible sinner, saying She had other children, when they confess only to the virgin conception, everthing BUT blessed, which was God's designation for Her. First off, just who called her a *terrible* sinner?
Please provide a link.
So having other children beside Jesus was NOT a blessing?
Do you not think that children are a blessing from God?
24
posted on
06/11/2017 6:47:31 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Trad Bishop
Please go back and read and reread what we said we were going to do and not do in this Caucus. Once again who are "we"?
A few questions:
Are you a bishop?
Are you a Catholic bishop? If yes, who consecrated you a bishop?
If you are not a catholic bishop, who is your "trad bishop" that you answer to?
25
posted on
06/11/2017 6:57:26 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: Trad Bishop; Religion Moderator; Admin Moderator; boatbums; metmom; ebb tide; All
I have no idea what you’re talking about, but you don’t get to change or establish your own rules. And we’re not going to have sub caucus designations. And this thread does not qualify for the Catholic caucus label anyway as you mention other religions/denominations/faiths.
RM will correct me if I’m wrong.
26
posted on
06/11/2017 7:08:07 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Trad Bishop
I see your new proposed caucus has been approved:
[Non Caucus Open thread]
Well done, bishop.
27
posted on
06/11/2017 7:10:09 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: ebb tide
You sir, can rest assured, I do not report to you. You have a pseudonym of ebb tide. Who do you report to? My ultimate reporting responsibility is to the Triune Godhead Whom all Catholics and Christians love and adore whose Feast Day we celebrate today. How about you? Every Bishop is responsible to the children of God to speak to them in His Name. Therefore, it is customary to acknowledge by using the term ‘We’ that he is only Christ's instrument and doesn't speak for himself. It puts the onus on me to watch what I say.
To: Trad Bishop
My ultimate reporting responsibility is to the Triune Godhead Whom all Catholics and Christians love and adore whose Feast Day we celebrate today. What about it? I post the postcommunion prayer of Trinity Sunday and you jump on me like a flea on a hound dog.
Go back to Pope Michael and his mother.
29
posted on
06/11/2017 7:37:23 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: Trad Bishop
Every Bishop is responsible to the children of God to speak to them in His Name. Therefore, it is customary to acknowledge by using the term We that he is only Christ's instrument and doesn't speak for himself.
It puts the onus on me to watch what I say.So are you a bishop or not? Please be truthful with your answer.
30
posted on
06/11/2017 7:45:29 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: Trad Bishop
As you mention Protestants you’ve negated the caucus thread protection. You may want to reference the caucus thread rules.
31
posted on
06/11/2017 7:49:43 PM PDT
by
ealgeone
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: Trad Bishop
Oh great the Catholic Cult thread has graduated to a Cult Bishop.Swim on.
33
posted on
06/11/2017 8:16:47 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: Jim Robinson; Trad Bishop
Thank you Jim, your response is correct.
I changed the caucus designation to what can now be seen after the title.
Trad Bishop: This thread in no way fits a caucus designation.
You have been here at FR for 13 days and have not made yourself aware of the guidelines established for the Religion Forum, yet you want to rewrite them.
That will not happen.
Read and watch for a while.
To: Trad Bishop
OK . I think I have narrowed it down.
Are you either Jean-Michel Faure or Miguel Ferreira da Costa?
Do you report to Bishop Richard Williamson?
35
posted on
06/11/2017 8:21:33 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: fatima
Do you have a problem with what you describe as a “Catholic Cult”?
Aren’t you a Catholic?
36
posted on
06/11/2017 8:35:14 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome)
To: ebb tide
37
posted on
06/11/2017 8:45:52 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Jim Robinson
I appreciate the clarification. Thank you.
38
posted on
06/11/2017 9:30:10 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: Trad Bishop
So you didn’t have permission to do this, you took it upon yourself and brought out the usual miscreants plus the owner of the site. Good going!
Phew.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson