Posted on 07/01/2015 7:13:05 AM PDT by RnMomof7
The question catholics better ask for themselves is how can a loving God turn His back on sincere folks who have lent themselves to blasphemies rather than accept The Lord Jesus Christ on Faith and be immediately born from above. What escape is there if catholics ignore so great a salvation as the Gift of Grace and immediate adoption into His family?
Crucifying Christ afresh.
If His sacrifice wasn’t adequate the first time around, when He died on a tree fulfilling prophecy, what on God’s green earth makes them think that “bringing Him down again” yanking Him off His throne, is going to work this time, especially when the CCC states that it’s a bloodless sacrifice, which is totally incapable of remitting one sin?
Let me know if you get an answer.
In the meatime, I’ll be getting the popcorn and gallons of butter ready....
No sir, I don't think He bows His head to anyone. Not now, not ever.
So many sincere people, so sincerely wrong and doomed by attaching themselves to the blasphemous 'other religion', another gospel, and rejecting Salvation immediately and adoption into God's family tot eh Glory of Christ, not catholic sacraments along the RCC salvation trail.
Well of course Christ as one of three in the One God does not bow to any created thing, any created lie, any created man. BUT that lie has the ‘nihil obstat’ given to it. Would that a few catholics could have spiritual eyes to see the blasphemy. Sadly, we have already seen how some will see it then make an excuse for it or fabricate some reason why they will not receive the Truth.
Wide is the road and broad is the way that leads to destruction and many are those who find it.
Might doesn’t make right and appealing to numbers does NOTHING to convince someone who believes in the sufficiency of Christ on the cross that Catholicsm is correct.
On the contrary, it’s a huge warning flag that you’re on the WRONG path.
It can’t guarantee anyone a place in heaven, even after a lifetime of jumping through the right hoops.
I am left wondering how cathollcs can so easily ignore Hebrews 9:28 ... ‘without reference to sin’, yet the RCC priest brings The Christ out of Heaven to sacrifice Him continually for sins, and commands Jesus to bow to the RCC priest? Wonder which priest will release Jesus to return the second time tot he Earth as prophesied in the Bible? When will the catholic church release their captive victim to return for His Bride? When will ... oh never mind. The blasphemies are beginning to make me ill.
Jesus is NO victim...
That’s for sure.
I don’t recall anywhere in scripture where He’s ever referred to as a “victim”.
“Victims” aren’t in control at all times and they don’t lay their lives down willingly.
‘The right hoops’ only play in another gospel, not the Gospel proclaimed in the Bible. Salvation by following the RCC trail hallmarked with essential sacraments administered by the RCC priesthood greater than Jesus The Christ, well that salvation is not trailing into Heaven. It serves to mock the Blood of The Christ though, and that’s pleasing to only one being and his cackling demons.
They teach that the priest is christ ..an alter Christus
In persona Christi is a Latin phrase meaning “in the person of Christ,” an important concept in Roman Catholicism and, in varying degrees, to other Christian traditions. A priest is In persona christi, because he acts as Jesus and as God. An extended term, In persona Christi capitis, “in the person of Christ the head,” was introduced in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
RM please review my posts 848, 854, and 875 and explain to Resettozero that my answer is completely true, since I can't comment on a document without directly reading it myself for veracity. It is entirely possible that he author is being quoted out of context and until it is seen in it's entirely in context any answer would be tentative at best.
Could you also explain to him the precedent established that you are entitled to ask a question 3 times before it become harassment.
So you think Jesus switched topics mid conversation? It’s evident that every one who has died drank water. Therefore we can deduce that drinking water causes death.
Do Catholics not die?
Thank you for posting a comment that has no bearing on anything.
Well! There's part of the problem right there! I do believe Jesus spoke about those highly educated who think they are wise.
The question highlights the demonic methodology of ‘selective literalism’. It is precisely what has been employed by Catholicism to disregard all the rest of the scriptures in order to found a pagan practice and blasphemous rites which hold catholics captive tot he heresies. So, asking if Catholics get thirsty or hungry points immediately at the heretical practice of selective literalism. And yes, that is the word I coined for this demonic methodology.
“See how your argument works? It’s stupid,ignorant and no TRUE conservative BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN will fall for those demonic liberal tactics”.
Your sentence is incoherent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.