Posted on 05/23/2015 8:15:24 AM PDT by ebb tide
It certainly is not. This has been a necessary consideration from the early centuries of the papacy, and certainly even more so in the past 20 years as digital communication has put practically every word of the Pope before the eyes of every Catholic and, of course, non-Catholics as well.
It is simply not true--- and never has been true --- that every word from the mouth of the Pope (or every sentence from his text program) comprises Catholic Doctrine. The Holy See itself lists a number of categories of Papal documents (FOUND HERE), with different levels of authority:
Motu Propriobut even these categories don't begin to account for distinctions within each kind of document.Apostolic Constitution Encyclical
Apostolic Letter
Apostolic Exhortation
Common Declaration
Homily
Audience
Discourse
Message
Pope Benedict XVI was, I think, the first pope to write and publish books during his pontificate which were non-Magisterial. In the preface of "Jesus of Nazareth: from the Baptism in the Jordan to the Transfiguration" he wrote:
It goes without saying that this book is in no way an exercise of the magisterium, but is solely an expression of my personal search for the face of the Lord (cf. Ps 27:8). Everyone is free, then, to contradict me. I would only ask my readers for that initial goodwill without which there can be no understanding.
You can wish that no pope should ever say or write anything sub-Magisterial ("prudential judgment" or "theological opinion") but that has never been, and I daresay will never be, the case.
It's no use to swing back and forth between two false extremes, papal maximalism ("He's an all-purpose oracle") and papal minimalism ("He's just a guy with an opinion.")
There's a of of gradations in between.
I wish more people were aware of that.
So far, neither of them has. Rather sneaky and confusing to the sheep in my opinion.
But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil. Matthew 5:37
But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth. Revelations 3:16
As far as calumny and rash judgement, look in a mirror. And don't be surprised if you see Jimmy Akin behind your shoulder.
It's more that that. Francis inferred the Blessed Mother may have despaired.
Pope Francis: "Im constantly making statements, giving homilies. Thats magisterium. Thats what I think, not what the media say that I think. Check it out; its very clear. The Joy of the Gospel is very clear."
http://americamagazine.org/issue/we-must-reach-out
mag·is·te·ri·um ˌmajəˈstirēəm/ noun the teaching authority of the Roman Catholic Church, especially as exercised by bishops or the pope. the official and authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.
That sounds like outright heresy: the magisterium is whatever Francis is thinking? He's flying solo now; to heck with his predecessors and Tradition.
I used my search function and could not find that quote in the article. Could you link it to source, please?
Sorry — I hadn’t read yours, which had the America link. I’ll have to go back and look at that.
It’s there. I just checked.
La Nacion: "As a pope you are different because you speak with utmost clarity, you are completely straightforward, you dont use euphemisms and dont beat about the bush; the course of your papacy is extremely clear."
La Nacion: Why do you think some sectors are disoriented, why do they say the ship is without a rudder, especially after the latest Extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the challenges posed by the family?
Pope Francis: Those expressions strike me as odd. I am not aware of anybody using them.
Pope Francis: Look, I wrote an encyclicaltrue enough, it was by four hands [with Benedict XVI]and an apostolic exhortation. Im constantly making statements, giving homilies. Thats magisterium. Thats what I think, not what the media say that I think. Check it out; its very clear. The Joy of the Gospel is very clear.
This section has him accepting the most risible flattery, and not only accepting, but serenely echoing it, making him sound almost thud-headedly un-self-aware.
If my most recent RCIA students conflated homilies, statements, encyclicals and magisterium like that, I'd say they weren't grasping the basic idea of gradations in authority. The Holy Father talks too loosely and too much.
Correct!!! Unfortunately, Pope Francis does not speak English. I think what he probably meant to say was that contrary to what many non-Catholics believe, the Church does not demand that women “breed like rabbits.”
I think we need to carefully scrutinize the translations of what Pope Francis says. As Pope Emeritus once said “every translation is also an interpretation.”
P.S. I meant to say Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. Sorry.
Glad you're beginning to see the light.
I’ve been saying that for 2 years now :o)
And that would be a full-on sin. The Catholic teaching is that the Immaculate Conception does not sin in words, actions, OR THOUGHTS. Francis absolutely inferred Mary sinned in her thoughts.
But, although a very heretical thing to say, it's also a very "ecumenical" thing to say.
And presumably he means what he says. His friends and enemies lists (enumerated on this forum in past discussions) reflect his values quite clearly. It is impossible to deny the significance of his appointments, removals, and eliminations (e.g., Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate) which embody both what he values and what he abhors. No pope (including his immediate predecessors) openly embraced the lies incorporated in Kasperian "serene" theology or published an official document describing aspects of homosexual "unions" in a favorable light. He is unquestionably the most radically modernist pope in history.
Pointing out the radical nature of this pontificate is nothing less than an act of charity toward "our Catholic and non-Catholic brothers and sisters". Those who have been generally misled, and in particular, those mired in the types of sins which have been front and center at the Synod could now not be faulted for falsely assuming that Kasperian theology and "precious support" from homosexual "unions" are in some measure compatible with Christ's Deposit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.