But the latest report – the one creating such a stir – claims that the tiny manuscript should not be dated to the fourth century. Instead, scholars have now dated it to approximately 741 A.D., meaning, more than 700 years after the time of Jesus. What kind of “evidence” is this?
Has anyone read the article?
This controversy is idiotic.
He is a groom for one bride, the Church.
can you even imagine a circumstance whereby Jesus got married, had a famile, sired children......and it was never mentioned by his Apostles????? Did they attend His wedding, were any of them present at the baptisms or circumcisions....did they just overlook this situation changing part of Christ’s life.....really???