Posted on 02/15/2014 10:52:59 AM PST by NKP_Vet
In his review of the movie Monument Men he chided FDR for not having the courage to bomb the train tracks to Nazi concentration camps. I guess in his world view children who were and are conceived as a result of rape or incest are inconsequential. At least he should be consistent...why should he care of past innocent victims but not care about present day innocent victims?
Being Pro-Life means no exceptions...either all of the innocent lives count or none of them count.
Not trying to be mean but what are you asking here? Why is that important?
There are just some situations where it’s no body’s business but the people directly involved and the Dr’s. Clearly there are difficult decisions needing to be made in these situations, which if we’re aware of need to pray with these folks.
Life is not always black and white...and none of the solutions are favorable to what is hoped for.
It restores my belief that the Truth has power, and will prevail.
Never give up; never stop telling the truth. It is the seed that falls on fertile ground.
Because what a raped woman thinks about bearing the child of her rapist matters.
He’s still a lapsed Catholic.
Wow, very powerful!
When people are planning to murder a baby, it’s “nobody’s business”?
Life IS sometimes “black and white.” Example: Murdering a baby is EVIL. It’s unjust. Nobody should be permitted to do it.
Is that “black and white” enough for you.
When people are planning to murder a baby, it’s “nobody’s business”?
Life IS sometimes “black and white.” Example: Murdering a baby is EVIL. It’s unjust. Nobody should be permitted to do it.
Is that “black and white” enough for you.
Of course it matters. She may need therapy.
But if what you mean by “matters” is that she should be permitted to murder her baby, then what she thinks does not matter. It is a crime. It is evil. It is unjust to the baby.
Of course it matters. She may need therapy.
But if what you mean by “matters” is that she should be permitted to murder her baby, then what she thinks does not matter. It is a crime. It is evil. It is unjust to the baby.
That sounds like you and his religion have a lot in common, he believes that Pope John Paul II is a Mormon.
Harry Reid is pro-abortion. He’s also a crook. Does he still qualify as a “devout Mormon.”
Of course, Cardinal Wuerl believes Nancy Pelosi is a Catholic, so who knows?
Harry Reid is pro-abortion. He’s also a crook. Does he still qualify as a “devout Mormon.”
Of course, Cardinal Wuerl believes Nancy Pelosi is a Catholic, so who knows?
Because what a raped woman thinks about bearing the child of her rapist matters.
And the murder of another innocent child doesn't matter, is that it?
Glenn Beck’s done a great job of exposing the commies like Van Jones, ValJar, 0, Anita Dunn, Soros, etc. He definitely needs to wake up on this and other (homo) issues, though.
I wonder if he’s seen this powerful letter/article. I’d love to hear him read it and hear his response, on air.
He could also read other stories of result of rape, but not aborted survivors. There are so many miraculous, remarkable stories out there. EVERY life is precious.
No, it matters as such.
Her decision as to whether or not to bear the child and either raise it or adopt it or abort it is what is going to determine the outcome.
That’s why it matters. In fact it’s the only thing that matters.
What doesn’t matter is your opinion of her decision.
Now if you wanted to actually have a practical effect on the outcome, you may want to advise her and convince her that bearing the child and either raising it or adopting it is the right thing to do.
But attempting to force her to do what you want is folly for any number of reasons.
Reason 1, you won’t have a lot of support for that, certainly not a majority.
Reason 2, you would first need a vehicle to advance your agenda, and the GOP is incapable of selling or advancing anything. Evidence Todd Akin.
Reason 3, even if you did muster majority support, a federal judge would toss it.
Reason 4, suppose you did get it passed into law, and a judge didn’t toss it, how exactly would you enforce it?
Would you incarcerate the raped mother for the length of the pregnancy to ensure that she didn’t abort it herself?
I really do not think you have thought through the implications of what you are proposing.
So, if you want to save those innocent lives, I suggest you get to selling the mothers on your position as effectively as you can, because their decision is the only thing that matters.
I don’t understand how people arrive at the idea that these exceptions are moral.
The child is still an innocent life, no matter how it was conceived.
Carry the child to term and put the baby up for adoption if you don’t want it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.