Hahahahahahahahaaaaa
Posted on 09/11/2013 4:52:10 PM PDT by NYer
May you come to know the truth within the Church founded by Christ.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
May you learn to abide by the rules and post translations of any foreign language you post. I don't think that rule applies only to those who post Latin.
It ended the WAY of Yah'shua. The Roman church of which you speak was started by
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
the Pagan Emperor Constantine in 325 CE at Nicea.
I wasn't speaking of a Roman Church started by Constantine. If you read my post, you'll see I was speaking of the pillar and ground of the truth.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
Make believe Hebrew is just silly and is not real Hebrew.
May you seek YHvH in His WORD ! AHH; you must be speaking of the religion of "peace"
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
Good by WHOSE standards?
God's standard is perfection. Without it, NO ONE can see His face.
Jesus said “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
Salvation is by grace through faith in Christ. There is no other name under heaven by which we MUST be saved.
Works don't save anyone, therefore no matter how good people think someone in the world is, they aren't saved unless they have repented and confessed and accepted Christ for the forgiveness of their sins.
Forgiveness is the ONLY way to be made righteous before God.
He started out as a non-believer. By the time he asked Jesus to remember him when Christ came into His kingdom, he had crossed the line, BY FAITH, and Jesus' response was that today, he would be with Him in paradise.
Saved by faith in a deathbed conversion.
Great is our God.
Post of the day......
AMEN!
Preach it, brother.
Looking at the photo you posted...
Is Pope Francis a descendant of Stan Laurel? Who has the Pope’s family tree?
SPV: It is not “obvious.” The fact that the word is not in the Bible is not sufficient proof. Is the word “Trinity” in the Bible? By the way, do you know what the word, “catholic,” means?
Well, the terms *sola scirptura* and *sola fide* are not explicitly found in the Bible and for that reason alone are wholeheartedly and thoroughly condemned by every Catholic I have ever seen post on the RF.
Can Catholics agree to stick to a standard of being consistent in what they do? Double standards are hypocrisy. Either it is rejected off the cuff if it's not found specifically by word or phrase in Scripture, or it is not.
This nonsense about accepting Catholic doctrine without it having to be mentioned specifically by word and rejecting *Protestant* doctrine because it is not mentioned specifically by word of which Catholic approve, is hypocritical beyond almost anything else I've seen.
If *trinity* and *Catholic* are expected to be accepted based on proof texts, be consistent in applying critical analysis and do not disqualify *sola scriptura* because it's based on proof texts.
Catholics need to show some integrity in this area.
He did. First in English and then in Hebrew.
Clue: Shalom = peace
Yah'shua HaMashiach = Jesus Messiah
Catholic education certainly is lacking if it's not Latin, eh?
That Catholic faith would be stripped bare if it weren’t for duplicity.
Amen.
I heard Dr. Ravi Zacharias speak last autumn. He was debating an atheist - and this atheist was no dummy. His arguments were very well thought out, and his attacks were rehearsed. He hid an ounce of truth in a pound of lies, and sold it to the weak minded.
Ravi related a story: he had just boarded an aircraft from a country he said he did not want to mention. Next to him was a woman who was originally from the Netherlands. She was a Christian who had a mission to rescue children from sexual slavery. She related to Ravi that the night before, she was holding a 9 month old infant girl that she had rescued just before the man was about to rape the baby. He recalled that another atheist, Richard Dawkins, had said all humans behave as they will - they are simply "Dancing to their own DNA." Zacharias' gentle voice suddenly turned to outrage and power, and confronted the atheist on stage and asked in a forceful tone: "Is THAT what this man was doing!"
The pope's blather about people following their "conscious" is not only embarrassing, is an outrage.
So let me get this straight. Catholics believe that anyone who has never heard of Christ and know nothing of God but live what Catholics would call “good lives” are going to heaven. Right?
Then Christ teaches, and Catholics believe, that they should go out to teach the world about Jesus. Right>
So now you have people who would have gone to heaven who refuse to believe in this Jesus guy because they have been good anyway and are now going to hell because they didn’t believe and become a Catholic. Am I getting this right so far?
Amen
Then why did the pope say: you don’t have to be a believer to go to heaven or sin is whatever you think it is?
Not getting what the Catholic church teaches to what their leader says.
Hahahahahahahahaaaaa
Good one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.