Catholic Expert Details 'Huge Homosexual Underground in the Church'

LifeSite News ^ | 2/26/13 | John-Henry Westen

[SgtHooper]

I am a Christian—an old testament Christian. We’ll both pray, and we’ll both talk, but I will act if need be, while you are still talking and praying. Because of this, my pass to heaven is tenuous, but perhaps worth the forfeit to expedite the “meeting” for those who would do this to our children.

[little jeremiah]

I thought the underground homo cabal problems were better now?

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

It is not a religion problem, a celibacy problem, or a church problem, or a doctrine problem. It is homosexual and sin problem, and a sin problem of those who are and were silent even if not actively abusing others. IMHO making homosexual acts a crime needs to be brought back, as it was for hundreds or actually in some cultures, thousands of years.

Anyone wanting on/off either ping list, freepmail me.

And if anyone thinks I'm harsh - making sodomy illegal keeps it in the closet where it belongs.

[little jeremiah]

A hotbed of homosexuality AND homophobia? Which one do you prefer? Aren’t they sort of either/or?

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

Rose’s book is about 7 years old. But who knows what the state of the network now is?

[GOPJ]

“Standing with the Pope against homoheresy,” was written in late 2012 by Fr. Dariusz Oko, Ph.D....

I think the liberalism of the 60's and 70's created a unique problem in the Catholic Church...

[BO Stinkss]

“Aren’t they sort of either/or?”

I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy. For the church to preach against homosexuality is like Obama bitchin’ about the debt.

[TArcher]

I don’t know how they stay in business.

 

It's no MYSTERY that the historical business of perverted eunuchs having "assumed dominion over the faith of others" in a spiritual slave-trade is very profitable. 

 

Got Indulgences?

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=sale+of+indulgences

"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;

 

...

 

 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "

 

"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"

--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786

http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/sacred/vaact.html

 

[mware]

I suspect there is a huge spiritual battle being fought right now in the Catholic Church. The fact that two cardinal have been excluded from voting in the coming conclave tells me quite a lot.

[michigancatholic]

There is a spiritual battle being fought in the Church, but it’s not for the survival of the Church. Rather, it’s for the immediate direction of its activity and attention. It’s not about “what;” it’s about “how.”

Make no mistake. The Church will go on existing and operating, and it will get to where it’s going. The question is, will it listen to the Holy Spirit and choose wisely and directly....or will it take a detour through more corruption and confusion and have to make yet more practical corrections later in order to get back on the path?

The essential teachings of the Church cannot change because what is the case, is the case. It’s a matter of fidelity to truth. On the other hand, the Church is having to reconcile itself to a new world with respect to circumstances and expression. And it’s fighting huge cultural losses in several parts of the world, while seeing a huge influx of new members in other parts of the world.

And two cardinals have not been “excluded” by man. They have recused themselves for reasons that they have believed sufficient and necessary. If there is “excluding” going on, God is doing it, not canon law.

[michigancatholic]

Yes, homoheresy. This is the attempted reformulation of the truths of the faith so as to allow homosexual activity to be justified. And it can’t be done without huge contradictions occurring. For this reason, it is doomed to failure, but it’s very difficult for some people with this affliction to accept this.

[michigancatholic]

Careful about the self-righteous enlightenment baloney. It’s kid stuff from a historical point of view, and proponents of it have been no strangers to corruption and sexual politics.

This too shall pass.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

>>Fr. Oko notes that his discovery of a “huge homosexual disease-ridden. boy-raping whackjob underground in the Church”<<

[Palio di Siena]

...as the cardinals sit in the Sistine Chapel facing the homosexual
Michaelangelo’s “Last Judgement” on the wall behind the altar.
Many of the male figures in the famous work were inspired by Roman male
prostitutes.
Oi Vey.

[count-your-change]

Is there a bit of irony there?
sitting and facing the Last Judgement?

[Palio di Siena]

More than a bit.

[TArcher]

>>It’s kid stuff from a historical point of view,

"1] Good men can easily judge that it is of the greatest importance that the true doctrine concerning the above‐mentioned parts, namely contrition and faith, be preserved. [For the great fraud of indulgences, etc., and the preposterous doctrines of the sophists have sufficiently taught us what great vexation and danger arise therefrom if a foul stroke is here made."
www.lcms.org/Document.fdoc?src=lcm&id=957

"For the gread FRAUD of indulgences"

What does this mean?

 

NO SALE.

[TArcher]

>>For this reason, it is doomed to failure,

Baloney. Homosexuals have infested the inbred MYSTERYous occult woodwork of every manifestation of theocratic tyranny throughout the history of Western Civilization.

How’s business at the Omaha branch of Pedophiles-R-Us these days?
http://www.franklincase.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11&Itemid=9

[michigancatholic]

Ah, but perhaps you and I are speaking of different sorts of failure.

Homosexuals usually succeed at getting their satisfactions, one way or another; they often succeed at corrupting institutions. But they do not, and cannot become the natural norm, nor can they supplant what is actually the case about reality ontologically. Homosexuality is merely a dead-end proposition with a very pervasive habitual force to it. Like Ebola it burns itself out.

[TArcher]

>>But they do not, and cannot become the natural norm,

They evidently didn't need to be the norm to be useful to the royal slave-breeding wannabe god-men for whom they served as the (XXY/Androgen-Insensitive?) keepers of the keys to the kingdoms of Babylon, Egypt, Rome...

In fact, it's reasonable to observe their abnormality was a desirable feature - one presumed to naturally preclude the eunuchs from using the powers vested in them toward the propagation of their own lineages.

Obviously the devious nature of their abomination and survival instinct was underestimated by their masters.