Posted on 11/23/2011 11:11:08 AM PST by marshmallow
The day of Pentecost finds 3000 people saved without Peter saying ONE WORD about an infallible Church putting its approval on what he preached. As a matter of fact, there is no place recorded that said that Christians, who "went everywhere preaching the Word" (Acts 8:4), needed or expected an infallible Church that existed to endorse the gospel, and verify that the gospel was true.
Satan has been loosed and the plague of homosexuality and other immorality spreading like wild fire in the Church is the result.
It's always been there...When your magisterium (whatever that is) proclaimed that all clergy had to be unmarried and uncommitted to women, the stage was set...
Your religion grooms this clergy class from childhood...And what you guys do not seem to realize is that celibacy is not a chosen lifestyle although that's what you guys proclaim...
We men are made to be united with women...Celibacy is very rare and it is a gift from God...You can't just chose to be celibate...
In their philosophical wisdom, this does not compute...Before I was saved, it did not compute for me either...I know where they are at...
Paul still refers to them as *brothers*.
People fall into sin.
That's what 1 John 1:9 is all about.
David was guilty of adultery and murder and God called him a *man after my own heart*.
Lot was referred to as *righteous* Lot, a term that I'd hardly have thought applied to him considering what he did.
Will believers who sin have to answer for it? Most certainly. Paul attributed the untimely death of some believers on sin in their lives.
Will it cost them their salvation? No. Then it would make salvation based on works.
There's a world of difference between sinning and choosing to reject salvation after one is saved. The first one, everybody does. The second one is up for debate, whether someone who is truly saved can later choose to reject it.
OTOH, there's plenty of speculation as to whether someone who accepts Christ and shows no change whatsoever in their lives was ever really saved in the first place.
Genuine salvation WILL result in a changed heart and life.
You are awful loose with that word Christian...And then to imply that it is your religion that is Christian is a mockery of the scriptures...
The scriptures define what the church , the body of Christ is...And sorry, it ain't your (C)hurch...
Iscool In their philosophical wisdom, this does not compute...Before I was saved, it did not compute for me either...I know where they are at...
We've all been there. That's what they don't get. We know where they're coming from because we were there and used to think that way as well.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Is Bishop Niedrauer back yet from his emergency heart surgery? Not that I really expect him to do anything, but I wonder if he is still running things or if he’ll be replaced soon.
And then it ended up in the 'book'... You're even close...The Apostles were not and are not the 'church'...And there was no (C)hurch...And still isn't...Your Catholic clergy and institution are not the church of the bible, nor the Apostles...
Then the homosexual community moved into the neighborhood in the early 1970's. The parish stayed straight until Most Holy Redeemer SCHOOL closed. It closed because the straight parents MOVED AWAY.
After that the Most Holy Redeemer convent closed...no children, therefore nuns not needed...and it became a hospice for AIDS patients and the visiting families of those patients.
Over the years the Catholic homosexuals came to live in the neighborhood as well, the straight OLD Catholics died out and the parish became mostly homosexual.
Thus the visit from the "outreworld" person of the cloth. Sad. But it was sad from the early 1970's.
That parish, Most Holy Redeemer, has never, in the last 45+ years, been "in trouble" with the archdiocese for doing ANYTHING outlawed or forbidden. Well, I never heard of it and it WOULD HAVE BEEN in the local Catholic newspaper. The old version used to be called The Monitor.
Archbishop Niederaur is an excellent bishop and very smart. It's necessary here. He replaced Archbishop William Joseph Levada, who became the new head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome.
Guess who he replaced?
Josef Ratzinger
Vatican City, May 13, 2005 / 12:00 am (CNA).- Pope Benedict XVI announced today that Archbishop William Joseph Levada, until now Archbishop of San Francisco, is succeeding him as the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
My Eastern Orthodox acquaintance who pays attention to Roman Catholic Church politics was aghast when Pope Benedict named Archbishop Levada to succeed him.
Nice to see an RC with some Christianity in his blood.
Please infect the rabid cliques hereon with same.
Welllllll
since the Ashteroth-Mary-Goddess cult purportedly chooses what’s up/down, good/bad;
who God’s Mummy is;
when said Mummy gets to join the ‘hypostatic union of the Godhead’
etc. etc.
they probably figure they can choose when to call bad good; good bad and how to apply their DAFFYNITIONARY.
i was aghast when JP II invited all the world’s religions to Assisi to “pray” together.
i didn’t see him lift up Jesus Christ and preach him to all these pagans, which included hindus, sieks, muslims, animal worshippers, etc. etc.
could have been the most disgraceful act i ever saw, i knew the end was near and the great falling away was well under way.
there is a small remnant though of faithful believers, just not sure any of them are bishops or cardinals.
That is an undeniable fact. And it will be visible.
does “genuine salvation” result in telling continuous and delibrate “untruths” about what the Church teaches and believes?
Give an example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.