Posted on 10/28/2011 6:59:29 AM PDT by markomalley
FWIW, smvoice DID give a source for the information.
It was this.....
-The Catholic World, August 1871, vol. xiii, pp. 580-89. The Catholic World reminding all Roman Catholics in the United States at the time of the First Vatican Council.
and this.......
-Vatican II. The Code of Canon Law. Coriden , et al., op. cit. Canon 212, Section 1.
When cults are studied, The Code of Canon Law and Catholic World Magazine, in addition to other RCC doctrines and deceits are covered. The CCC, the history of the RCC, the false doctrines, the heresy, Rev. Chapters 17 and 18. Yep, they’re all covered.
Yes, and we learned that the 1871 edition of Catholic World is part of his/her Bible Study Class.
Sure, part of your Bible Study Class.
Or course that’s where you found it.
yes, certainly, that’s the ticket.
Really glad you remembered where you got it from.
The whole purpose of linking to sites is to prevent copyright infringement. I don’t see that that is an issue with either of the two documents provided, no matter what the websites they were gleaned from.
It the material posted at those websites was the actual work of that website, yeah, copyright laws would be an issue, but those other websites used it as well from another source so it is not their material that they have a copyright to.
A magazine from the 1800’s is well past copyright laws and does The Code of Canon Law from Vatican II is pretty much public domain.
Hey, I understand that the comments made by both sources are an embarrassment to the Catholic church, but that doesn’t justify this kind of behavior to try to get them pulled.
YOu people are really too much. Of course, studying cults would be of no interest to the RCC. Believe as you will. I really don’t care. God knows. And He will say when you or Judith Anne stand before Him: “You THOUGHT. And you were wrong.”
THIS time people have seen the quote/link connection for themselves. Anyone should be able to live with that. Those too sensitive for the open forum should stick with the caucus threads.
“Either let me set Judith Anne straight once and for all, or ban me.”
I vote for neither.
As far as “taking pleasure in the continuing accusations” I have not accused you of anything, nor would I take pleasure in doing so. That is, in itself, an ugly accusation. I forgive you.
On open threads, thin-skinned people are the disruptors, according to the RM.
I find the whole episode humorous really.
Like watching a contortionist get stuck for a couple of hours.
thanks.
Your vote doesn’t count. You are either going to stop accusing me of visiting bannned, nefarious websites and gleaning information from them, or shut up about your “opinions” of where the information came from, or PROVIDE THE SMOKING GUN. When the acknowledgments are CLEARLY spelled out, you have no excuse for your constant accusations. And the acknowledgments ARE CLEARLY SPELLED OUT. There is nothing “thin-skinned” about being accused of stealing or lying. You need God’s forgivenss, Judith Anne. On more than just this matter.
ROFLOL!!!
The fruit of Catholicism.
And they can’t figure out why people leave the Catholic church or aren’t interested in *swimming the Tiber* and coming back.
Unbelievable...
I pointed out that a google search of the first line of your quote yielded the first two results. I informed everyone. You became upset.
I forgive you.
Leave copyright investigation up to the moderators. To avoid flamewars like this in the future, if you question the source, let me know by Freepmail.
Do not badger another Freeper. That is also "making it personal."
>>>>>There is nothing “thin-skinned” about being accused of stealing or lying.
Sure there is. Catholics are accused all the time of idol worship, necromancy, leading people to hell, vain repetitions, and somehow we cannot answer back directly because that would be against the rules.
Surely you can handle a little google website attribution. It’s not like we said you were a cult or anything like CB says about the Catholic Church.
Amd, God bless you.
Even worse: a cult in Bible Study Class.
:)
:)
I posted before I saw the RM’s comment. No apology will be forthcoming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.