Posted on 10/23/2011 6:23:05 PM PDT by hiho hiho
That is simply not true.
There are many women in the Bible who taught the scripture.Priscilla is the first that comes to mind, as was Huldah.(spelling?).
That is simply not true.
There are many women in the Bible who taught the scripture.Priscilla is the first that comes to mind, as was Huldah.(spelling?).
—
The Christian church had for 2,000 years not allowed female clergy. It takes a considerable dance to claim that the devout Christians that preceded us were wrong. I hope that you don’t believe “we” have received “new light” — I can assure you that there is only one true and unchanging light.
Now, I once was a strong supporter of ordained female clergy. This was partially influenced by a spectacular female rector who had a wonderful personality and was a great administrator. But, I have also seen elsewhere what happens when female clergy are appointed. This caused me to rethink my position. The conclusion — St. Paul (through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit) was right. It should be noted that this rector (referenced above) has also had a change of heart regarding this issue.
I have noticed that the denominations that have allowed female clergy are now dealing with the (related) issue of gay clergy. The sole reason for allowing female clergy is one of rights and fairness, this has opened the door for any other minority group to demand their “rights.”
No one suggested that women did not have a considerable part in the establishment of the Christian church. There are many names, first and foremost, the BVM.
That said, there are no examples of ordained female clergy until recent times. To think otherwise is scriptural revisionism.
This is not cultural, St. Paul was speaking to cultures that had pagan priestesses.
Now to the Catholic gay problem. This is a serious problem, but one of deception. The churches that are now ordaining non-celibate gays are condoning a behaviour never ever accepted by the Catholic church.
The list of churches that now ordain both females and non-celibate gays is long. The list of churches that (knowlingly) ordain non-celibate gays but females doesn’t exist.
Final sentence should read —
The list of churches that (knowlingly) ordain non-celibate gays, but NOT females, doesnt exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.