Skip to comments.
Catholic Sex Abuse Hearing Descends Into `Shut Up' Order and Charge of 'Abomination'
Courthouse News Service ^
| March 25, 2011
| Reuben Kramer
Posted on 03/26/2011 12:59:03 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,341-1,356 next last
To: muawiyah; buccaneer81; Dr. Eckleburg
What does Eckleburg translate to?
221
posted on
03/26/2011 7:59:34 PM PDT
by
WPaCon
(Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
To: muawiyah
"Gatsby is a kind of T. J. Eckleburg; he has created a god like image of himself, but the image is doomed- the dream will turn to dust- and like Eckleburg, Gatsby also has occasion to brood over the ashes of the past, over the solemn dumping ground of worn out hopes"Quite fitting for the old girl.
To: WPaCon
I fail to see the rationale behind the thinking that disobeying God is going to protect one from spiritual attack.
Sinning always leaves on open to spiritual attack.
But pray away to idols if it makes you feel better.
223
posted on
03/26/2011 8:03:49 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
“I fail to see the rationale behind the thinking that disobeying God is going to protect one from spiritual attack.”
Same with me.
“Sinning always leaves on open to spiritual attack.”
Yes, it does.
“But pray away to idols if it makes you feel better.”
What idol am I praying to?
224
posted on
03/26/2011 8:05:57 PM PDT
by
WPaCon
(Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
To: fatima
Try following the conversation before replying.
225
posted on
03/26/2011 8:06:30 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Comment #226 Removed by Moderator
To: metmom
227
posted on
03/26/2011 8:07:45 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: metmom
What state are you in? Depending upon your answer, I might guess that everyone you could talk to, Catholic or otherwise, votes dem.
Assuming, of course, that your post is even true.
228
posted on
03/26/2011 8:08:01 PM PDT
by
Celtic Cross
(Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
To: buccaneer81
lol. From an "opinion" by a Roman Catholic at Catholicism.org.
Every reputable outlet cites the correct statistics that 54% or Roman Catholics voted for Obama while 45% of Protestants voted for Obama.
The only thing recalcitrant RC apologists have on their side is their proclivity toward fantasy.
229
posted on
03/26/2011 8:08:33 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
Comment #230 Removed by Moderator
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Every reputable outlet cites the correct statistics that 54% or Roman Catholics voted for Obama Yeah, CNN, MSNBC, DU, HuffPo, Kos...
To: buccaneer81
Comment #233 Removed by Moderator
To: metmom
God,Catholic’s ignore sin.What is sin to you.
234
posted on
03/26/2011 8:12:22 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: MarkBsnr
Your history is missing some important facts. It was not until the 1200’s under Pope Innocent II that the church rules changed to only prohibit married priests.
1) “For the first 1200 years of the Churchs existence, priests, bishops and 39 popes were married.” - Source: Kelly, J. N. D. Oxford Dictionary of Popes. New York, Oxford Press. 1986.
2) “Celibacy is not essential to the Priesthood.” - quote Pope John Paul II - Source: Time Magazine. July 1993.
3) “You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church.” St. Peter, the pope who was closest to Jesus, was married.
To: Religion Moderator
I suggest you give that order to ALL the posters allegedly “making it personal.”
To: stevem; Dr. Scarpetta
I think bishops that did this were either pederasts themselves or earned for themselves reservations in the deepest regions of hell or both. If they are extant, and it can be proved, they need to be put in prison.Ah, yes, the eternal papist caveat -- "if they are extant..."
Will a Cardinal suffice?
CARDINAL PROMOTED ALLEGED SEX ABUSER
237
posted on
03/26/2011 8:15:43 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: buccaneer81; Religion Moderator
Yes. Please try to enforce your rules consistently.
238
posted on
03/26/2011 8:15:51 PM PDT
by
Celtic Cross
(Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
To: buccaneer81
Not necessary, the RF guideline is when one poster in a sidebar has been warned, all posters must consider themselves warned.
She added that the substance of the claim that DiSipio witnessed something is still unclear. "I just don't know if it's true," Hughes said. "I really don't know if it's true."Yet she spouts a charge in open court? This is a judge? Time for her to step aside.
240
posted on
03/26/2011 8:17:04 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,341-1,356 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson