Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Mary Sinless?
The Aristophrenium ^ | 12/05/2010 | " Fisher"

Posted on 12/05/2010 6:14:57 PM PST by RnMomof7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,501-2,5202,521-2,5402,541-2,560 ... 3,401-3,413 next last
To: Cronos

Do you consider Presbyterians members of a “cult?”


2,521 posted on 12/11/2010 2:11:51 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2503 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

You know nothing of the Catholic faith and what it teaches.

I’ll look at just one of your so called Catholic beliefs.

“salvation by good works;”

No dear heart, salvation is by grace alone. Did you mean justification? Yes Catholics believe we are justified both by faith and by works of love (charity.) Both of which are given impetus by God’s grace. It is the way our will responds to the grace of God. We could not have faith or charity if we did not first receive His sanctifying grace. We do not have these because of our merits but because of His merits. But it has never been taught by the Church that good works save us. Justify us, yes. Save us no.

By the way, Alter Christie is not the same thing as “another Christ.”


2,522 posted on 12/11/2010 2:17:20 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2520 | View Replies]

To: the lastbestlady
Yes it does...She is without sin.

And you now that how?

2,523 posted on 12/11/2010 2:17:20 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2518 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Cronos
Thank you for the link, Dr. E. I linked over to the site you posted and read through several posts. To be honest, I could not find any of the stuff Cronos is complaining about. In fact, as a non-denom Bible College graduate, I could not really find anything that I objected to and I am not an OPC member. Perhaps if Cronos could be a little more specific concerning what he objects to, I could research it, but as of now, I think he must be mistaken and is referring to someplace else.
2,524 posted on 12/11/2010 2:17:21 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2392 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw

me too


2,525 posted on 12/11/2010 2:18:50 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2494 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

I disagree with Cronos that OPC is a cult, even if some of its members act in a disgraceful fashion. They are simply an orthodox (as defined in the Reformed faith)Calvinist denomination. I think they came about in response to the heresies arising in the USPC such as increasing acceptance of same sex relationships and other abandonments of Christian moral teachings.


2,526 posted on 12/11/2010 2:21:18 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2524 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; 1000 silverlings; Quix; editor-surveyor; the_conscience; metmom; RnMomof7; smvoice; ...
You do of course, realise that the OPC is not a Church like the Baptists or Lutherans or Anglicans etc. are — the OPC is a non-Christian cult, just like eht Jehovah’s Witnesses or LDS.org.

Do you consider Presbyterians members of a "cult?"

Ronald Reagan was a Presbyterian. Dwight Eisenhower, Andrew Jackson, Condoleezza Rice, John Wayne, Bob Dole, Bill Frist, Jimmy Stewart, Sally Ride, Dan Quayle, Dick Armey, Donald Rumsfeld, Sam Walton, J. Edgar Hoover, Philip Anschutz, George Allen, Henry Luce, Karen Hughes, Robert Louis Stevenson, Stonewall Jackson and Ann Coulter were/are all Presbyterian.

Are/were they all members of a "non-Christian cult?"

2,527 posted on 12/11/2010 2:26:12 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2503 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Thanks for reading for yourself and coming to your own conclusions.

The OPC differs from the larger PCUSA in that the OPC doesn’t ordain women. As I’ve said before, I could just as happily worship in a solid Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, Episcopalian, Congregational, non-denominational church where the word of God is preached in truth and light.

And I have. Many times. It’s not such a difficult thing to discern. Where the word of God is preached in truth, there is light and the congregation benefits. Where the word of God is held in near disdain and the doctrines of men are taught instead, there is darkness.

And those given eyes to see can tell the differnce.

By the grace of God alone.


2,528 posted on 12/11/2010 2:31:56 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2524 | View Replies]

To: boatbums; Dr. Eckleburg

He objects because the darkness can not stand the light


2,529 posted on 12/11/2010 2:33:52 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2524 | View Replies]

To: the lastbestlady; RnMomof7; metmom; Quix; null and void; lastchance; Cronos; Dr. Eckleburg; ...
Yes it does...She is without sin.

You're way behind. We've gone far beyond the original topic and we're now engaged in a holy war concerning what color card board hats we will wear when we reach "Fushal."

After arriving at Fushal, we will partake of all manner of hotdogs, doughnuts and other savory delights and we shall wear hats of great majesty, though they be made of colored cardboard and have humorous arrows through the top.

One faction believes the hats should be red while the other group believes they should be blue.

2,530 posted on 12/11/2010 2:37:13 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2518 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"So you can’t provide us with any “lies of Calvin,” only more meaningless, assaulting verbiage."

Puleeeze, the lies are self evident to anyone who reads Calvin or witnesses the un-Christian escapades of his followers. The lies are too extensive for a single post to contain and a rehash by me would only make me want another shower.

The Gospel is this "Good News." It is as Christ proclaimed by making His own the following passage from Isaiah:

The Spirit of the LORD God is upon me, because the LORD has anointed me to bring good tidings to the afflicted; he has sent me to bind up the broken hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound; to proclaim the year of the LORD'S favor.

2,531 posted on 12/11/2010 2:38:40 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2510 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
A balanced review.

Subsidiarity holds that government should undertake only those initiatives which exceed the capacity of individuals or private groups acting independently

But a certain class today see individual or small private groups as the ignorant masses and those who hold to Biblical morals as dangerous, and that they are the elite who know what is best for us, and whose rule should be imposed, for our own good.

That individuals working together in free association can and do accomplish goals that advance the common good. That can hardly be said about a one world government that compels individuals to contribute their labors and the fruits of those labors for the good of the State.

But who/what defines "good" is the question.

The law regulating such an authority would therefore have to be answerable to National laws in order to meet the criteria for subsdiarity and solidarity. Any international law formed to regulate the authority would have to be subservient to National laws and would only be invoked if individual nations were unable to deal with a current crisis.

Same question as above.

Now do I think it would be possible for any global authority no matter how well intentioned to not usurp authority from sovereign nations? No I don’t. Do I think it is possible for such a global authority to fall into the hands of idealogues who will advance principles contrary to Western democracies? Oh boy do I.

The authority of men of God in the Bible who provided new authoritative doctrine was established by their conformity to what was prior established as from God and by Gods manifest power. Thus false leaders claim to be both but fail when examined by Berean type souls and method, and the man of sin will mislead those who by his working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders. Of whom we are forewarned (without damning those hold to a preterist type eschatology)

2,532 posted on 12/11/2010 2:43:22 PM PST by daniel1212 ( ("Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2513 | View Replies]

To: lastchance; metmom; RnMomof7; boatbums; Grizzled Bear; editor-surveyor; Alex Murphy; ...
You know nothing of the Catholic faith and what it teaches.

Not only is that mind-reading and against the rules of the FR RF, I and anyone on these threads can easily learn for themselves what the RCC teaches from the mouths of Roman Catholic apologists.

And sadly, those words often do not reflect Christ's teaching in the Scriptures.

No dear heart, salvation is by grace alone. Did you mean justification? Yes Catholics believe we are justified both by faith and by works of love

Let's drop the smarmy sarcasm, shall we?

RCs say "salvation is by grace alone" and then in the very same sentence go on to say men are "justified (saved; made right before God) by faith and by (their own) works of love."

Can you not see the contradiction?

Either men are saved by GRACE ALONE or men are saved by grace AND by their own good works of charity.

Rome believes the latter, to its shame.

Alter Christie is not the same thing as “another Christ.”

Tell that to your priestcraft...

THE AMAZING GIFT OF THE PRIESTHOOD
by Father Kenneth Baker

"Simply stated, the Catholic priest is another Christ. Through his ordination he has been granted the amazing gift of being a channel of divine grace for the eternal salvation of those he come into contact with — both in his official ministry and in his personal life..."

"a divine channel for salvation???"

Faith in Christ is the "divine channel" by which men are saved individually according to God's grace through the work of the Holy Spirit within them. One on one. No interlopers required.

Magick and alchemy are not a solid basis on which to peg your salvation. Read the Bible and know for certain that there is "only one God and one mediator between God and men, the man, Christ Jesus."

And He is enough. Thank God.

2,533 posted on 12/11/2010 2:46:28 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2522 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
The Gospel is this "Good News." It is as Christ proclaimed

Yes...yes...and what is that "good news?"

Can you hear it now?

What is the good news Christ preached?

2,534 posted on 12/11/2010 2:48:24 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2531 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
One faction believes the hats should be red while the other group believes they should be blue.

Do you think believing in "another Christ" and a "co-redeemer" comes down to a difference in color?

2,535 posted on 12/11/2010 2:50:01 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2530 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

I think you don’t understand the reference.


2,536 posted on 12/11/2010 2:52:59 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2535 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

I wasn’t “trying.” I posted his idiotic musing.

According to God’s word, preaching the good news of Christ risen is how men may know their salvation has been won by Christ on the cross.

God determined this blessed understanding would come by words and sentences and concepts preached and recorded in the writings of the Apostles.

Frank thought it better to stare at his navel and “preach to the animals” and “without words.”

Good luck with that.


2,537 posted on 12/11/2010 2:54:32 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2516 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"Do you consider Presbyterians members of a "cult?"

You are going to have to be a lot more specific than that. Of the following list there are more than a few cults, most notable is the OPC.

Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church

Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church in Pakistan

Evangelical Presbyterian Church

Free Presbyterian Church (Australia)

Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland

Presbyterian Church of Australia

Presbyterian Church of Eastern Australia

Presbyterian Reformed Church

Reformed Presbyterian Church of Australia

Southern Presbyterian Church

Westminster Presbyterian Church of Australia

Australian Free Church

Bible Presbyterian Church

Church of Scotland

Church of South India

Council of Revival Ministers

Cumberland Presbyterian Center

Cumberland Presbyterian Church

Cumberland Presbyterian Church in America

Evangelical Presbyterian Church (Australia)

Evangelical Presbyterian Church (Ireland)

Evangelical Presbyterian Church in England and Wales

Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Ukraine

Free Church of Scotland (Continuing)

Free Church of Scotland (post-1900)

Free Presbyterian Church (Australia)

Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland

Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster

Free Reformed Churches of Australia

Grace Presbyterian Church of New Zealand

Greek Evangelical Church

Igreja Presbiteriana de Moçambique

Indonesia Christian Church

Presbyterian Church in Malaysia

Non-subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland

Orthodox Presbyterian Church (US)

Orthodox Presbyterian Church of New Zealand

Church of Pakistan

United Presbyterian Church of Pakistan

Presbyterian Church in Ireland

Presbyterian Church of East Africa

Presbyterian Church of Korea

Presbyterian Church in Taiwan

Presbyterian Church in the United States

Presbyterian Church in the United States of America

Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand

Presbyterian Church of Eastern Australia

Presbyterian Church of Nigeria

Presbyterian Church of Pakistan

Presbyterian Church of Wales

Presbyterian Reformed Church (Australia)

Reformed Churches of New Zealand

Reformed Presbyterian Church – Hanover Presbytery

Southern Presbyterian Church (Australia)

Synod of Otago and Southland

United Church of Christ in the Philippines

United Free Church of Scotland

United Presbyterian Church

Uniting Church in Australia

Uniting Presbyterian Church in Southern Africa

2,538 posted on 12/11/2010 2:57:19 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2527 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
"Do you think believing in "another Christ" and a "co-redeemer" comes down to a difference in color?"

GB - The main point of contention on these threads is the portrayal of Catholic belief as something other than what it is and willful repeated misinterpretation of Catholic Catechism after many corrections.

In Catholicism the term "alter Christi" is used to describe the actions of the priest who, during the mass, acts in the place of Christ in the recreation of the Last Supper. It does not mean, as Dr. Eck states over and over again, that the Priest is an another Christ.

Similarly, the Catechism of the Catholic Church is very, very clear that there is only one mediator, Jesus Christ. It does state that Mary participated in our Salvation by agreeing to birth and raise Jesus.

2,539 posted on 12/11/2010 3:09:17 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2535 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Worship is more than sacrifice.

There is nothing anywhere that says that there’s not a sacrifice involved than it is not worship. That is, again, manipulating definitions. It’s just hair splitting to try to make those kind of fine distinctions.

Bowing down, lighting candles, and praying to someone has enough elements of worship for it to be legitimately called that.

All throughout the OT, people were condemned for bowing down to images and praying to others besides God. Do so at your own risk.


2,540 posted on 12/11/2010 3:13:41 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2476 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,501-2,5202,521-2,5402,541-2,560 ... 3,401-3,413 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson