In Christ Alone (Happy reformation day)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExnTlIM5QgE ^ | Getty, Julian Keith; Townend, Stuart Richard;

[Quix]

Given the record in assessing what Scripture means,

Y’all could have a confidence level of 100% and I’d still be greatly skeptical of the analysis.

[Quix]

Guffaws.

I can only say, her Scriptural posts float my boat.

[1000 silverlings]

only in root beer

[Quix]

I don’t think I’ll touch that post with a DSM IV.

LOL.

[presently no screen name]

her Scriptural posts float my boat.

Well said, Quix! I agree. Thanks, Dr. E. What a blessing you are to The Body of Christ.

[Quix]

Obviously

we are dealing with a new rare species . . .

A new school . . . or is it flock? . . . of

Rabid Clique RC

SUPER SNARKS!
.
.
.

Who leap tall Proddys on a single flight on a White Hanky;

Who leap Mt Everests of Truth with a single bound--welllll actually, they slither around the base of such . . .

Who fly through the wires with the greatest of cheekiness;

Who by day pretend to be Clark UnKempt's . . . of the Temp Agency: Occasionally Mild Mannered Aspiring Jerks Inc.

And who by night try vainly to sleep longer than 4 hours a night while reciting repeatedly . . . "We defended Mother Mary! We defended Mother Mary! We defended Mother Mary! She'd be aghast but we defended her anyway!"

[Natural Law]

"Some people seem to want to make this all about you. Probably to deflect scrutiny of their own behavior.

It's a good thing they are in a forum that permits them to do so.

[1000 silverlings]

*She'd be aghast but we defended her anyway!" *

lol, lol

[1000 silverlings]

sorry to inform you, but whenever one starts his/her posts with the pronoun "I" it's about him or her

[Judith Anne]

sorry to inform you, but whenever one starts his/her posts with the pronoun "I" it's about him or her

So, that one's about you?

[1000 silverlings]

which one, it’s against the law to mind read

[Judith Anne]

969. Who’s “sorry to inform you”?

[OLD REGGIE]

969. Who’s “sorry to inform you”?

Actually, anyone who attempts to inform you of anything.

[1000 silverlings]

well there’s no subject. It could have been *I*, it could have been *we*, it could have been *God*, or the *stars* or anything. then it was a statement, revealing nothing personal, as opposed to *I* went to these big fancy schools, *I* work 60 hours a week, *I* etc etc. When a poster posts personal information, real or imagined, he or she, is making the thread about him or her self. Get it now?

[Natural Law]

"it’s against the law to mind read"

Which "law" would that be? God's law, Man's law? Natural Law? Laws of Physics? Light Anti-tank Weapon? ????

Unless you are implying that it is even possible to actually "read minds" isn't the forum rule against it unnecessary?

[1000 silverlings]

don’t ask me, ask the one who makes the laws.

[Natural Law]

"don’t ask me, ask the one who makes the laws."

And who would that be? Whose laws are being violated by mind reading? Do your rules of evidence require that the accuser must demonstrate successful mind reading or only, circumstantially, that an attempt was made to perform the impossible? Does the accused have to prove their innocence or does an allegation by the right party convict?

What happens in the case we so often see on these threads when only through an exercise in attempted mind reading can an accusation of mind reading be made? Do you simply revert to the four legs good, two legs bad method that concludes Catholics are guilty by reason of Catholicism? No wonder the Pauliwogs are so perpetually confused.

[Judith Anne]

Let’s go talk in the other room.

[Natural Law]

"Of course Rome wants to encourage sectarianism."

Protestantism needs get down on its collective knees and thank God for the Catholic Church. With the examples of Protestant on Protestant sectarian violence given in these threads the unity provided by a collective hatred of the Catholic Church is the only thing keeping ya'll from killing and eating each other.

[annalex]

All,

I will deal with as many posts as I can now, and will resume when I am able. Thank you all for your spirited responses.

NOTHING in this life is "infallible" but Jesus Christ

See,"doctor", this is just your conviction. Christ, however, appointed His Church not to fail (Mt 16:18) and be without blemish (Ephesians 5:27). Disagree all you want, -- it is Jesus Whom you just called liar. Congrats, good going, so typical of Protestant couunterscriptural charlatanism.