Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intended Catholic Dictatorship
Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,481-10,50010,501-10,52010,521-10,540 ... 15,821-15,828 next last
To: caww

Then it’s not in vain. 8~)


10,501 posted on 10/11/2010 11:24:08 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10496 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Well, I actually DO know what WAS being discussed

What do you think was being discussed?

10,502 posted on 10/11/2010 11:25:16 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10494 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

The winner and new champ...15,000!


10,503 posted on 10/11/2010 11:26:54 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10500 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr

I do indeed know what Mark was talking about— why it’s difficult to believe that some are Christian. Have you forgotten? Do you need a refresher? I cannot imagine why you are trying to get me to state what has already been stated. Can you explain?


10,504 posted on 10/11/2010 11:27:18 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10499 | View Replies]

To: caww; Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr; D-fendr

15,000? Oh, riiiiiiight.


10,505 posted on 10/11/2010 11:28:37 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10503 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr

It’s not hypothetical, nor as you accused, “my own concoction yet you attributed it to others.” I was trying to avoid the insults and discuss the content of the statement - unsuccessfully, here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2578704/posts?page=9171#9171

So, again, does this “gibberish” statement illustrate “an incorrect understanding of the Trinity.”


10,506 posted on 10/11/2010 11:29:28 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10498 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

lol.


10,507 posted on 10/11/2010 11:30:23 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10505 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg

ROFL! Well done.

Perhaps Dr. E. can explain that.


10,508 posted on 10/11/2010 11:31:31 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10506 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

I predict its gibberosity will suddenly disappear.


10,509 posted on 10/11/2010 11:33:48 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10508 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; judithann; metmom

That statement doesn’t say anything about the Trinity which was the topic at hand. The reformed were accused of misunderstanding the Trinity.

You lose. Try again.


10,510 posted on 10/11/2010 11:36:00 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10506 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Why is it “well done?” How does that statement have anything to do with the Trinity? (Which is what was being discussed, just in case you didn’t have a clue.)


10,511 posted on 10/11/2010 11:37:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10508 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

What was being discussed?


10,512 posted on 10/11/2010 11:38:25 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10504 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
That statement doesn’t say anything about the Trinity which was the topic at hand. The reformed were accused of misunderstanding the Trinity.

Well, that will happen anytime you get a post like 9171. And frankly it IS about the Trinity.

10,513 posted on 10/11/2010 11:38:33 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10510 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
What was being discussed?

ROFL! I'm not doing your work for you. If you can't remember, just say so.

10,514 posted on 10/11/2010 11:40:00 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10512 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

How is it about the Trinity?


10,515 posted on 10/11/2010 11:40:08 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10513 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr

You see nothing regarding an incorrect understanding of the Trinity in the statement:

““Jesus’ body carried God.”

Ok. Seems quite obvious to me there’s a major misunderstanding of the Triune God there. Perhaps we can revisit that.

Is it still gibberish?


10,516 posted on 10/11/2010 11:41:21 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10510 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Judith. I was discussing it. I know what was being discussed. You chimed in with nonsense and have yet to tell us what your nonsense means.

What was being discussed that you agree with Mark?


10,517 posted on 10/11/2010 11:41:38 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10514 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Metmom was discussing Mary and the RCC’s incorrect understanding of the Ark.

You somehow have extrapolated four words from those exchanges into a discussion of the Trinity.

Your error.


10,518 posted on 10/11/2010 11:43:26 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10516 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr

I agree with Mark’s post 10434. That’s nonsense? I am not the person slinging around the word “gibberish.”


10,519 posted on 10/11/2010 11:46:22 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10517 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

“Jesus body carried God” is an obvious statement about the Son and therefore the Triune God.

As for discussing the Ark, if it is incorrect - or gibberish - it also fails on this point.

I should ask: Do you also believe “jesus body carried God” is a true statement about the Son and the Incarnation and the Holy Trinity?


10,520 posted on 10/11/2010 11:46:54 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10518 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,481-10,50010,501-10,52010,521-10,540 ... 15,821-15,828 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson