Bill Donohue: Over the line?

dotCommonweal ^ | David Gibson

[Alex Murphy]

Don't make the thread "about" another Freeper...

LOLOL! That's right kiddos, this one's all mine!

[sitetest]

Dear Religion Moderator,

My apologies. I posted before seeing the offending post removed.

I welcome your removal of my post that quoted the disgusting post.

Thanks,

sitetest

[sitetest]

Boy, you’re quick.

[trisham]

You’re the Smooth Moderator, baby.

[Quix]

I find the assertions in the post to be wholesale balderdash.

My post got zapped on my Dad’s computer but to summarize . . .

The RM, if anything, to keep sane and avoid A SUPER EXCESS

of RC whining; wailing, throwing dust in the air and RC abuse-button-sitting marathons,

probably looks the other way over 80% of the RC posters’ offenses of

1. PERSONAL ASSAULTS
2. Other offenses they wail about Prottys over but liberally get away with themselves.

I don’t per se fault the RM for doing so. I think it’s the only way he can stay sane and functionally do his job given the givens.

The RC’s seem to think nothing of bothering Daddy JimRob over their petty thin-skinned sensibilities at the drop of a hat. Yet, they do the same sort of thing they whine so much about in quadruplicate usually with marked impunity.

Yet they have the unmitigated gall to claim things are biased AGAINST THEM????

What wholesale balderdash.

[Quix]

BTW, I’m 100% confident that a panel of unbiased atheistic communications professors could document such RC favored stuff on any number of religion forum threads quite easily.

[Quix]

We prottys have to endure

hostile, trolling, outrageously titled and stated RC posts and threads virtually 24/7.

You don’t hear us whining anything remotely close to the RC whines.

[narses]

More noise from the UFO crowd. Yawn.

[Petronski]

Predators never whine.

[Quix]

I’m responding to a post about how the Prottys are treated more kindly than the RC’s . . . which I find horrifically the opposite of ‘objective reality.’

I would guesstimate that the RC stuff that goes unslapped compared to the Protty stuff that goes unslapped to be roughly

65%-75% of RC violations go unslapped compared to

15% of Protty violations go unslapped.

I think it would be easy to find 20 threads where that was objectively quantifiable.

[Quix]

And insults against the Church is making it personal to a Catholic

- - - -

Now the RC’s don’t want just a special dictionary for themselves, they want to insist that their special dictionary be the only one for all of FR.

How quaint.

Welllllllllllll, whoop T doo

All the Prottys could decide the same thing.

How sweet would that silliness be!

[Petronski]

Who you callin’ boy?

[Quix]

Seems to me that Prottys ought to have some input into such a process.

And, away from home, I have no ping list.

My guess is that the Prottys feel there is no hope of having lasting influence in such a process so they are just not bothering.

[Quix]

Prottys could say the same thing about several RC’s.

[Quix]

Hogwash.

[Quix]

Hogwash.

[Quix]

with spamming and trolling not accepted.

ALL SUCH ARE IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER. . . .

And RC’s have long demanded and too often gotten wholesale

favoritism on such scores.

Even from the fairest and most evanhanded of RM’s.

Otherwise, the RM (& too often JimRob) would have not a moment’s peace from the compulsively whining RC’s.

[Petronski]

Anti-Catholic Fetishists of the World, UNITE!

[Petronski]

Is this the time on the thread when you tweak Catholics with a 2x4?